You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

creativesoul

Comments

Begging the question(regarding whether or not Trump has abused his power over people) and a bit ironic(as a result of the characterization of "the wor...
September 02, 2019 at 18:39
The notion of "political correctness" began falling out of fashion for good reason, but one of them was not as a means to exonerate unacceptable thoug...
September 02, 2019 at 03:50
This rings true...
September 02, 2019 at 03:38
Sure. For some the fear and/or worry of andor about Trump is magnified - in part at least - by confirmation bias. The consternation of Trump is also m...
September 02, 2019 at 03:26
All good. I was just curious if s/he/they would give their word.
September 01, 2019 at 17:02
I'm going to leave this here. Clearly you are not willing to engage honestly, sincerely, and respectfully. May our paths never again cross.
August 31, 2019 at 18:26
Well no. You do not believe that. You know that there are rules for debate and that they are not of my own making.
August 31, 2019 at 18:24
That's true.
August 31, 2019 at 18:22
I'm waiting for you to give your word to follow the rules of acceptable debate. You - evidently - know them already.
August 31, 2019 at 18:22
Never said it did. You're arguing against an imaginary opponent.
August 31, 2019 at 18:21
If you know them, what's the hesitation? That list wasn't meant to be complete.
August 31, 2019 at 18:17
What's not true at all?
August 31, 2019 at 18:15
What does the political nature of the discussion have to do with following the rules of debate?
August 31, 2019 at 18:04
I do not know your intentions. I didn't dismiss your good intentions. I'm skeptical - rightly so given your hesitance to give your word. Hence, upfron...
August 31, 2019 at 17:50
Bear with me...
August 31, 2019 at 07:24
That's good. I'm not sold on the sincerity. Forgive my skepticism. The notion of "good faith" is much too vague. Will you recognize and honor the rule...
August 31, 2019 at 07:22
I'm awaiting your word... your agreement... that we will both work from the standards of acceptable debate. Do I have your word?
August 31, 2019 at 02:52
Indeed. No argument here. It still needs to be done.
August 31, 2019 at 02:49
I'm not conflating this conversation with current political events. I can expect someone to follow the rules of acceptable debate and it can be the ca...
August 30, 2019 at 07:37
Do you care about meeting standards?
August 30, 2019 at 07:35
The standards of acceptable debate apply to us both equally.
August 30, 2019 at 03:59
Gratuitous assertions are unacceptable. Red Herrings are unacceptable. Poisoning the well is unacceptable. Ad homs are unacceptable. Non sequiturs are...
August 30, 2019 at 03:57
Zat it then?
August 30, 2019 at 03:54
Whoa, that's quite a few logically possible sets of reasons that you've attributed to my words. Lying is a part of the world. I'm not here to call out...
August 30, 2019 at 03:07
Good. We understand each other. When one enters into a public philosophy forum and begins arguing, s/he/they enter into a voluntary obligation to defe...
August 30, 2019 at 03:03
Resorting to the same ungrounded school-yard-style name calling will surely get both dirty...
August 29, 2019 at 16:05
It's not silly to ask someone if they actually believe that what they are saying is acceptable. Normally, I grant the sincerity of a speaker. Here, I'...
August 29, 2019 at 16:02
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question.
August 29, 2019 at 15:44
I wouldn't get too hopeful. There are far too many unknown influencing variables for that particular Trumpian rant. Like a child without metacognitive...
August 29, 2019 at 03:34
There seems to have been a slight misunderstanding. I did not ask if you care if I accept the counterpoints you've provided here. I asked if you thoug...
August 29, 2019 at 03:29
Do you seriously believe that your 'arguments' here("counterpoints" is a better description) are acceptable?
August 27, 2019 at 05:50
Morality is one of these things.
August 25, 2019 at 04:15
The difference between being 'X' and being called 'X' is determined by whether or not we are the deciding factor in what counts as 'X'. Elemental cons...
August 25, 2019 at 04:13
That doesn't follow from what I wrote. That is morality. That follows. You're conflating moral judgment that is based upon one's morality with moralit...
August 24, 2019 at 19:12
One's obligation to the rest of society. Have a problem with that ?
August 24, 2019 at 07:17
So... A morality based upon the God of Abraham. Treating others how God instructs. A collection of stories passed down through the generations through...
August 24, 2019 at 05:55
Why not?
August 23, 2019 at 16:19
No one is talking about unlimited liability except you. So, then... You're ok with accepting some financial obligation - to maintain the society you b...
August 23, 2019 at 07:36
So, it seems that you do not think/believe that you are in any way at all - outside of scripture - financially obligated to the society you belong to?
August 23, 2019 at 07:22
Interesting. Didn't know that there were thoughts about unilateral sharing rights and assets in the Quran. Certainly none in the Pentateuch.
August 23, 2019 at 07:10
Are you suggesting to let the less fortunate and elderly people suffer needlessly? Are you suggesting that a nation can survive/thrive without some fo...
August 23, 2019 at 07:07
I depicted no such thing as unlimited liability.
August 23, 2019 at 06:26
Yeah those ancient authors and their economic jargon...
August 23, 2019 at 06:24
Those who benefit the most from society have the greatest burden of repayment(debt). Without a society, the accumulation of monetary financial wealth ...
August 23, 2019 at 06:09
Morality is a set of codified rules of behaviour. All such rules are subject to the individual(cultural, societal, social, familial, and/or historical...
August 23, 2019 at 06:05
Communist-like morality.
August 23, 2019 at 06:00
I meant the depth of our agreement.
August 23, 2019 at 05:51
Bad things happen to good people. Good things happen to bad people. We can watch it take place. There are innumerable historical examples thereof. So,...
August 23, 2019 at 05:51
Sorry for the delayed reply. I'm not sure that I follow your reasoning here Jeep. The agreement is more superficial than it may seem. It begins and en...
August 23, 2019 at 04:29
Of the buddhists I've spoken with, there seems to be something peculiar - fishy - about the way they talk about causality. Karma.
August 20, 2019 at 04:57