You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

creativesoul

Comments

Some. Not all.
November 18, 2019 at 00:32
Keep in mind his aim. He is proposing a method of approach to the very idea of conceptual schemes. He grants them all coherence and meaningfulness and...
November 18, 2019 at 00:24
See my exchange with Marchesky...
November 18, 2019 at 00:00
"Being true" is Davidson's focus. Davidson kicks out correspondence. His doing so leveled the playing field by requiring only coherence. In this way t...
November 17, 2019 at 23:58
And yet, we all know that correspondence must be adequately accounted for... it is after-all the default position of unquestioned naive realism that w...
November 17, 2019 at 23:54
Davidson also rejects talk of the facts, if for no other reason than such talk is somehow inadequate for translatability.
November 17, 2019 at 23:49
Being true is Davidson's focus.
November 17, 2019 at 23:48
Relevance?
November 17, 2019 at 23:46
See Banno's verbatim report of Davidson's own words... the paper we're discussing... in the beginning if memory serves me.
November 17, 2019 at 23:45
Davidson rejects truth makers...
November 17, 2019 at 23:42
Don't bite Banno. It's too easy, and the interesting stuff we're heading towards has yet to have come...
November 17, 2019 at 23:41
That's not the distinction I've raised though. I reject both rationalism and empiricism on the same ground. So, given that Banno was drawing an equiva...
November 17, 2019 at 23:36
That's an interesting take. The words aren't the same. Are the referents?
November 17, 2019 at 23:28
I cannot speak to that. I am of the view that there is one world, and it includes us. I am further of the view that there are two major categories of ...
November 17, 2019 at 22:55
I'm not in disagreement. Uncharacteristic of me... sure. Nonetheless, sometimes convention agrees and/or supports my own position. Davidson has influe...
November 17, 2019 at 22:50
That's why Davidson moved on from such an approach, right?
November 17, 2019 at 22:36
I think the point about the ministry was that a change in terminological use alone does not always guarantee talking about the same things(referents)....
November 17, 2019 at 22:32
Was it Davidson who claimed that if we know what it takes for a statement to be true, then we know what the statement means? Is convention T showing t...
November 17, 2019 at 22:29
Yep. That's a sticking point for me... as a general criterion. However, in this context, I can happily accept it, for it is imperative - I think - to ...
November 17, 2019 at 22:22
You've offered different descriptions regarding kinds of thought and belief. You've not offerd a universal criterion for what counts as thought and be...
November 17, 2019 at 22:06
This is the part that I completely agreed with earlier... The only sticking point to me is the criterion of being both true and meaningful. I'm not su...
November 17, 2019 at 21:48
Sometimes... I'm either not clear enough, or you misunderstand. As you well know, my own position regarding thought, belief, and meaning is unique. Wh...
November 17, 2019 at 21:30
...And what do all those examples of thought and belief have in common such that having it is what makes them thoughts and beliefs instead of somethin...
November 17, 2019 at 21:18
Ok. Good. Would you now answer my question? What does all human thought and belief consist of, on your view?
November 17, 2019 at 19:13
Believing in human races makes one a racist. Saying what's on your mind makes one a good president. There seems to be a pattern here of utterly inadeq...
November 17, 2019 at 19:05
This dovetails nicely with thought, belief, and meaning as correlations. In this case, shiny new phrases play the role of the messy old mental concept...
November 16, 2019 at 21:38
What do statements about the world and/or ourselves mean??? That's a strange question. I mean, strange that one would not know this already, at a very...
November 16, 2019 at 21:25
Plutocracy in the guise of a republic with democratic traditions...
November 16, 2019 at 21:20
I wanted to redress this. My last comment came off as a bit too snarky for my own tastes. My apologies. The latter... Which domain sets out what all t...
November 16, 2019 at 20:17
Interesting thread Banno. Just to set aside any misunderstanding, I do not think that conceptual schemes inhere in the mind without or prior to langua...
November 16, 2019 at 19:47
Everything. What is the minimum criterion that need be met prior to our assent that the candidate under consideration qualifies as a case of reason, o...
November 16, 2019 at 05:30
Sometimes. What do statements about the world and/or ourselves mean? Does that work for you? Is that close enough to your questions?
November 16, 2019 at 05:26
Do you know what all attribution of meaning consists of? Not one type. Does that help?
November 16, 2019 at 05:06
Did you understand the first claim?
November 16, 2019 at 03:43
Why? Do they say stuff like that too?
November 15, 2019 at 07:52
As I said... groundless pretension.
November 15, 2019 at 06:37
All attribution of meaning consists of correlations drawn between different things. I would not pursue a question about the meaning of descriptive sta...
November 15, 2019 at 06:35
No thanks. Your questioning is chock full of groundless pretention. I'm not in the mood to indulge your rhetorical drivel.
November 15, 2019 at 06:18
Let me know when you can keep up. Until then, I suggest a careful re-reading...
November 15, 2019 at 06:15
So... the mental is the domain which clearly sets out what all human thought and belief consist of?
November 15, 2019 at 05:24
Aww. That's too bad. There is so much more to enjoy. They are identical at their core. All correlation. The separation only applies in situations wher...
November 15, 2019 at 05:12
As in... in the head?
November 15, 2019 at 04:55
Which domain clearly sets out what all human thought and belief consists of?
November 15, 2019 at 04:51
:brow: Happy?
November 15, 2019 at 04:44
All thought and belief statements consist of predication. All prediction is correlation. Not all correlation is predication. All thought and belief co...
November 15, 2019 at 04:43
Step numero uno. Get human thought and belief right. That's the first thing I mentioned.
November 15, 2019 at 04:40
What if I'm having issues accepting the framework you're using?
November 15, 2019 at 04:15
I understand the transcendental to be... not transcendent. :brow: That's incoherence rearing it's ugly head.
November 15, 2019 at 03:59
I would laugh, elbow bump, and buy you a drink!
November 15, 2019 at 03:54
Sure... Where is the category regarding human thought and belief?
November 15, 2019 at 03:52