You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

apokrisis

Comments

I see you are pretending to take seriously the ironic answer so as to run away from the actual answer which followed. Not so subtle. Quite transparent...
August 16, 2020 at 05:12
Do you have the page number where he said this? Not ringing any bells yet. Don’t be so hard on yourself. I don’t take your anti-totalising rants to he...
August 16, 2020 at 05:08
Instantly? Gee, I’m impressed by your memory for books you might have read 30 years ago that failed to capture your imagination. Well, clearly you are...
August 16, 2020 at 03:06
Oh I see. I didn’t think much of his first book and so I should have read his latest? Here is a previous discussion anyway.... https://thephilosophyfo...
August 16, 2020 at 02:39
The job application just went in. Thanks. That was the article I was looking at too. This does feel the key - the search for invariance, the search fo...
August 16, 2020 at 02:23
References?
August 16, 2020 at 02:09
How is it the bone in the throat? Do you mean that if everyone self-actualises as the highest personal good, then no one is left to give them respect....
August 16, 2020 at 02:07
Maybe you missed the point at which I entered this conversation. My geopolitically informed view is that even a buffoon can’t damage the US in an end ...
August 16, 2020 at 01:42
I’m indifferent to the degree it doesn’t impact on my freedoms. That is the “personal” answer anyone would give who is unable to talk about a wider vi...
August 16, 2020 at 01:36
Because I really have no idea who you want to be answering. I had assumed you wanted the answer from "entropy's point of view", so that is what I gave...
August 16, 2020 at 01:13
And who are you asking that question of now? God? Some Platonic abstraction? Some random dude on the internet?
August 16, 2020 at 01:07
In history circles, it is well understood as a term. And the idea that history could have a direction, a trajectory, is also highly disputed. Hegel's ...
August 16, 2020 at 01:05
I replied that the US likes to say the government should keep its nose out of people's business. That is the social context that in fact constrains US...
August 16, 2020 at 00:38
That reply is as lame as it gets. You say it is an interesting question until the moment it gets asked. Then run away. It's an incredibly easy questio...
August 16, 2020 at 00:32
Well what should be done with dissenters then?
August 15, 2020 at 23:54
Sure. There can be a definite act of dissent because there is that one law. You have confirmed what I just said. What would dissent even look like if ...
August 15, 2020 at 23:23
The US population could just refuse to go to work, to socially distance, to wear masks and wash their hands. The US "ethic" surely says that in a soci...
August 15, 2020 at 23:15
Yeah. That sounds like a “good reason” to resist something. So out of spite, you will spread your arms, step off the cliff, and thus demonstrate your ...
August 15, 2020 at 21:13
Stop being an idiot. Why is carbon dioxide stable? Because one carbon atom and two oxygen atoms collectively form a lower energy state than the same t...
August 15, 2020 at 21:06
And that is what I have said. It is foundational. It is the ground of the natural world. So whatever else follows, there is already an “ethics” - as i...
August 15, 2020 at 09:47
I never got the impression you found science easy. And yet it does a pretty good job at moving towards an ever more unified model of nature.
August 15, 2020 at 08:10
So there is nothing you would name as a fundamental good or basic precept? That’s convenient.
August 15, 2020 at 08:07
Tough question because maybe there just aren’t no right answers and any view would be context-dependent. To pick up on the points I raised, if we aske...
August 15, 2020 at 07:18
So pragmatics or what? Give your best example of an ethical precept you feel is fundamental. We can then see how it stacks up against the logic of the...
August 15, 2020 at 05:26
You are the one waddling off in a huff, dignity wounded but nose still in the air.
August 15, 2020 at 05:10
Your usual cop out. :cheer:
August 15, 2020 at 04:39
You continue to misrepresent. Thermodynamics constrains what we can do. The ethical question then becomes, is there some good reason to resist the gen...
August 15, 2020 at 04:11
And so how do you define “ethics”? How does Banno define “ethics”? If one is troubled by the old is-ought chestnut, this must be because one is alread...
August 15, 2020 at 03:38
Rather than complaining, make your case. What are you waiting for? Your requests for clarification are a familiar tactic. I gave you an answer. Why sh...
August 15, 2020 at 03:24
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_stability
August 15, 2020 at 03:21
Big sook. :joke:
August 14, 2020 at 23:49
No. You have no interest in venturing out of your lair to explore another point of view. You accuse me of ambiguity. I have told you your Procrustean ...
August 14, 2020 at 23:44
That is why I said they were the origin. The breaking is still an ongoing progress. Yep. And it was a useful division. Atomism and reductionism produc...
August 14, 2020 at 23:40
I don’t see a problem at all. But maybe that’s just because I don’t take a rigid approach to classificatory systems. My constraints based thinking is ...
August 14, 2020 at 23:32
Just read and digest what I wrote. Stop trying to dumb it back down to fit your tired rhetorical template. If you can point out a flaw in my constrain...
August 14, 2020 at 23:08
:up: You’re right about the grandmother hypothesis. My use of “senescent” is more technical here as it is a term that can be applied to biological sys...
August 14, 2020 at 22:55
I don’t see how science is even possible without metaphysics. Metaphysics is simply that attitude of mind that is willing to seek for an overarching r...
August 14, 2020 at 20:22
That’s fine. The natural philosophy view does seek to include all four Aristotlean causes including finality. But it also isn’t claiming anything myst...
August 14, 2020 at 19:56
Yeah, nah. The whole is-ought issue is what I seek to bypass. Thermodynamics enshrines a probabilistic approach to ontology. So all one can say about ...
August 14, 2020 at 07:30
:up:
August 14, 2020 at 05:47
Again, if I don’t accept that criterion, the problem as stated doesn’t exist for me. Just because a paradox can be proposed and accepted as such doesn...
August 14, 2020 at 05:20
Such questions provide their own answers. The one can only be in contrast to the many. And vice versa. At the very first step you are caught in the ne...
August 14, 2020 at 05:05
I don’t see this is an issue if ontology is allowed to come to the Aristotelean conclusion that substantial being is complex. The answer to the questi...
August 14, 2020 at 04:34
The psychological machinery at work here is the difference between habitual and attentional processing. If you operate at the level of habit, you have...
August 14, 2020 at 03:50
I would say the distinction is simple. The actual opposition here is between ontology and epistemology. Metaphysics is the overarching discipline brok...
August 14, 2020 at 03:17
Erm. That's why I put poison in quotes. What was poison - a toxic byproduct - for primitive anaerobic life then became the basis of a photosynthetic w...
August 14, 2020 at 02:50
Couple of points to expand upon. Isn't it interesting how religion is a racket? In European history, it was a state-owned racket and even a state-owin...
August 14, 2020 at 02:35
My question is still whether there is anything real being debated as opposed to a lot of suddenly frightened and anxious people dividing into interest...
August 14, 2020 at 00:03
Sure. But probabilty itself is a measure of the predictable. Chaos has an equilibrium structure and isn’t actually “chaotic”. It is only our descripti...
August 13, 2020 at 23:14
I agree that what is truly at stake has become hard to discern. What we are presented with in the media are two caricature extremes - woke cancel cult...
August 13, 2020 at 22:34