You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

apokrisis

Comments

Does it help to say that even in deepest sleep we have a dim ruminating sort of consciousness? The brain can't actually shut down. Every neuron has to...
August 26, 2020 at 23:08
Did you have an example of one?
August 21, 2020 at 06:32
Of which there are none. Except in every sci-fi work of fiction I guess.
August 21, 2020 at 06:09
Did you misunderstand? I was saying that humans with conscious intent write the programs. The computer runs the program without consciousness or inten...
August 21, 2020 at 05:53
Hah. Wasn’t expecting that comeback! :rofl: Have you ever checked out Howard Pattee on the “epistemic cut”? He makes the best hard-nosed physicist’s c...
August 21, 2020 at 04:53
@"Wayfarer" Yep. And this context can’t be just “represented”. It has to be lived all the way down in that physically embedded sense. What biological ...
August 21, 2020 at 03:24
You can say you believe it because you have already presumed that life is made of “meat”. You have skipped straight over the issue of how that meat ev...
August 21, 2020 at 02:07
I think the hole in your argument is that creative thinking involves both this deductive reasoning (from the general to the particular), but more impo...
August 21, 2020 at 01:54
A set of instructions written by someone with conscious intent for a machine lacking such a capability.
August 21, 2020 at 01:39
My summary is that I don’t say it is impossible that machinery could be “conscious”, but we have to recognise why standard notions of computation aren...
August 21, 2020 at 00:26
But beliefs without a rational basis apparently. Well that was already clear. :up:
August 19, 2020 at 20:07
I’m trying to keep things simple. Sure the photoreceptors respond to a range of energies. But still, that energy is being sampled by three pigments wi...
August 19, 2020 at 11:59
I note you carefully steered clear of my last question. How are you defining "just"? So unless you are simply happy to keep chanting propaganda slogan...
August 19, 2020 at 01:23
Yep. That is the social side of the equation. We must always be able to offer the world some good reason for our actions. So there is the dilemma. Our...
August 18, 2020 at 23:50
Wrong. Absolutely wrong. Sadly also absolutely wrong. Screamingly, laughably wrong. Like being wrong every time you make a claim? That would be a bett...
August 18, 2020 at 22:08
Disruption of that mid-brain habit vs frontal brain attention axis I was talking about? Compulsions are the urge to emit stereotyped actions patterns....
August 18, 2020 at 22:01
Think it through. How could one even define "social" except to the degree that individuals are in some kind of conformity? Collections don't have to b...
August 18, 2020 at 21:49
More correct is that it reveals that habit can be overridden by attention. The decision to push a button at some particular moment is a habitual act -...
August 18, 2020 at 21:21
I would argue that nothing needs replacing, but an extension is required. A missing element of meaningful assertion has to be recognised. The liar par...
August 18, 2020 at 20:53
But it is easy to evolve extra photo pigments yet even as many as three Is unusual in large brain mammals. However dragonflies can have 30. So evoluti...
August 18, 2020 at 20:08
What’s your definition of “just” then? For example, is it just for the law to impose a duty of care on you as a driver so that you could be charged wi...
August 18, 2020 at 09:39
Only the bit you posted. I generally agreed with that. My position is that the primary/secondary distinction is a matter of degree as all perceptual q...
August 18, 2020 at 06:35
Vagueness is better as it speaks to what we don't know. And even that to which may be unknowable or undifferentiated. Uncanny just means strange and u...
August 18, 2020 at 05:03
So you accept the rule of law then? On what basis? And when it comes to rights, doesn't jurisprudence usually say rights come with duties? For instanc...
August 18, 2020 at 03:43
The technical term you were searching for is "vague".
August 18, 2020 at 03:31
He did the genetics and was searching for test candidates who had expressed two variants of the "red" photopigment gene. The way that the developing r...
August 18, 2020 at 03:28
There’s definitely a bridge in my book. But it is neurosemiotic. Ain’t no one wants to talk about that. :wink:
August 18, 2020 at 02:05
I agree that this is a critical point, but it may not touch the fundamental point - at least so far as the Hard Problem is framed. It is really import...
August 18, 2020 at 00:15
You have an expert understanding of the issues. What are your own thoughts on the prime puzzle of qualia? Why is red experienced as red? That is, we c...
August 17, 2020 at 21:03
Even judgements of weight are deeply psychological - secondary qualities - as shown by Weber-Fechner’s Law. We experience the proportionate difference...
August 17, 2020 at 11:37
Colour reveals the surface and so helps you see the shape. Imagine you had a bag of toy animals all in the same green plastic. You have to sort them f...
August 17, 2020 at 11:09
Might want to check on colour constancy before going too far down that dead end. https://youtu.be/XYnqH_HHZDo
August 17, 2020 at 05:22
You may be right. I'm just going on the literature of the time and my conversations with those doing the research, such as Dr Gabi Jordan and Dr Jay N...
August 17, 2020 at 04:33
This is in fact an issue of basic philosophical import as it forces us to change our whole thinking about what "minds" are for. We think of them as be...
August 17, 2020 at 03:40
Is turquoise blue or green? If you try the same shade of that on a number of people, you can get different answers, suggesting small differences in ne...
August 17, 2020 at 03:25
I spent a lot of time studying it as science, thanks.
August 17, 2020 at 02:24
But our eyes and brains interpret a world of objects. If representing actual frequency were so important, why would the eye sample the world at just t...
August 17, 2020 at 02:12
It is a particular branch of maths these days. Symmetry theory. Although of course it used to be mostly geometry as you might expect. The maths of spa...
August 17, 2020 at 01:56
Here is someone who knows what he is talking about! :strong: This is bang on. It is not about seeing "colour" as it is in the world. Reflectance is si...
August 17, 2020 at 01:30
You’re doing a lot of shoulder shrugging here. Sure I characterise the divide in caricature terms - woke vs redneck. But then people are caricaturing ...
August 17, 2020 at 01:06
But you keep avoiding direct questions. As well as those of others.
August 17, 2020 at 00:34
What kind of answer did you think the OP wanted? Were not its language and concerns explicitly neurobiological? But I guess you have your Procrustean ...
August 16, 2020 at 23:30
Armed militia would worry me. Cancel culture is being matched by online extremism. If there is unravelling, it is happening in both its directions. ht...
August 16, 2020 at 23:27
Sure. There is a distinction to be made. But is it due to a "language game" or is it due to neurobiology? One starts to sound awfully Whorfian about c...
August 16, 2020 at 23:16
:chin:
August 16, 2020 at 22:27
Sure. In the context of a neurobiological discussion, that certainly does become a meaningful use of words.
August 16, 2020 at 22:23
odd that folk seem to thing that philosophy of language explains away the question ... as if there were no experience, just its notion.
August 16, 2020 at 22:03
You are being terribly literal. But yes. Liberal democracy would mean being free to fight for such arrangements and free to contest such arrangements....
August 16, 2020 at 21:55
That’s the bind. If you aren’t free to be unaffected by things then you aren’t really free. But there is no point to freedom unless it is so as to be ...
August 16, 2020 at 20:53
Heh, heh. Ask a neurobiological question and get some rando pushing philosophy of language. Sorry about your retinal disease. I’m sure it is more than...
August 16, 2020 at 05:55