You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

apokrisis

Comments

It is always "possible" to posit some kind of hidden machinery in this fashion. And so science doesn't try to prove something is not the case. Instead...
November 19, 2020 at 00:11
Why propose these pussy half measures? Surely the logic of your position demands that all sentience should be ended immediately by any means necessary...
November 18, 2020 at 00:00
Yes. We observe effects and impute their causes. We can note some change in the world, and then we can construct an explanatory model of what could ha...
November 17, 2020 at 21:05
This comes together in any holistic perspective, like Tao, Hegelianism or Peirceanism. You have the three things of an action, its negation, and then ...
November 16, 2020 at 00:08
That misses the point that words have the power to lift thought beyond such embodied reactions and into what we call a rational level of semiosis or s...
November 15, 2020 at 19:04
This is the feature and not the bug. It is the arbitrariness of a symbol that allows it to be the signifier of any state of interpretance. It is how t...
November 14, 2020 at 23:30
Paramecia and worms are responding out of reflex - a genetic hardwired circuit, so a third level even below attention and habit. Humans also have refl...
November 13, 2020 at 18:54
I wouldn’t agree that habit level processes are unconscious and thus that only attentional processing is conscious. When driving on automatic pilot, y...
November 13, 2020 at 10:10
It is more complicated. But as a general principle, yes. Your brain tries to do everything at the level of subconscious habit. And then by default, th...
November 13, 2020 at 03:44
As I say, I can't remember Deacon saying anything surprising so far as biosemiosis went. But the way I view this is to stress that semiosis depends on...
November 13, 2020 at 01:22
In maths, zero doesn't stand for the void. It is the additive identity element - just as 1 is the multiplicative identity. Anything plus 0 is unchange...
November 11, 2020 at 23:39
I can't remember the detail of his position - his book came out 10 years ago. But to the degree he understands biosemiosis, the critical difference is...
November 11, 2020 at 22:39
What point is Deacon trying to make in regard to "absentials"? As with Pattee, Bateson, Peirce and many others who speak for a biosemiotic approach, t...
November 11, 2020 at 03:13
In: Emergence  — view comment
Not sure what you are arguing precisely but I would talk about top-down constraints more than top-down causation to emphasise that this is about a reg...
November 09, 2020 at 20:14
In: Emergence  — view comment
From my time in mind science, this is a reason I came to dislike the use of the term. Emergence is invoked in the sense that "something pops out" as t...
November 09, 2020 at 04:05
In: Emergence  — view comment
I would see boulders as part of a fractal entropic flow. Every boulder is on its way - over eons - to being crumbled into fine sand. And every boulder...
November 09, 2020 at 03:08
In: Emergence  — view comment
The problem is that "viewer" already implies a passive notion of consciousness - the classic Cartesian mistake. So it builds in the conclusion that th...
November 09, 2020 at 02:30
In: Emergence  — view comment
It's just a model. That is stated up front. And models are about frames and their events - some set of laws and some collection of components. So sure...
November 08, 2020 at 23:27
This is just an optimal cognitive strategy. We employ counterfactual reasoning - if not 'yes', then necessarily 'no' - to extract the most possible in...
November 08, 2020 at 23:01
In: Emergence  — view comment
As some one who defends a pansemiotic ontology, I would point out how a brutely physical level of reality would be organised by the failure to care, o...
November 08, 2020 at 22:17
Is that different from what I said? Sure. My point is that this is something that has to develop. Every newborn has to go through the process of disco...
September 18, 2020 at 09:03
Just because you keep repeating that claim doesn't make it true. So far you have neither demonstrated that your conception of Nothingness is actually ...
September 18, 2020 at 04:11
That is just a formula you keep repeating to duck the points I've made. You have yet to justify it as a reasonable position to take - a priori, or oth...
September 18, 2020 at 03:35
Well what are you giving as the proper interpretation of what you had in mind? What's your argument for a priori reasoning being exempt from empirical...
September 18, 2020 at 03:23
There is of course a central unresolved tension in quantum theory - the issue of wavefunction collapse. The maths works beautifully right up until the...
September 18, 2020 at 02:54
If you click on the three dots at the bottom of your post, you should find a pencil edit icon that let's you change stuff yourself. :ok:
September 18, 2020 at 01:50
Maybe what folk mean here is that quantum theory can't be understood in classical terms? There is no point banging your head against that particular w...
September 18, 2020 at 01:47
Yup. It is by understanding how knowledge is an embodied process that we can start to imagine how to turn it into a disembodied one. We can move from ...
September 18, 2020 at 00:30
My argument is that we have to start from where we are as the thing we are certain about. So if we are certain that there is no such thing as an empty...
September 18, 2020 at 00:11
Exactly. If you wind back quantum theory all the way back to the beginning, you still arrive at something rather than nothing. Indeed you arrive at th...
September 17, 2020 at 22:57
My point was that this is too simplistic. A fully relational view of knowledge makes the psychological observation that the "we" who observes is a con...
September 17, 2020 at 22:33
Rather than something from nothing, or something from something, the third option is something from everything. The Universe could have emerged as a g...
September 17, 2020 at 21:47
But what if we use this "psychological" fact as the stepping stone to the larger metaphysical picture? So your argument is that the "truth of reality"...
September 17, 2020 at 01:18
That's a misrepresentation. The brain is not doing maths at all. It is trying to predict its "sensory inputs". It is saying things like that flower sh...
September 16, 2020 at 02:57
You mention pragmatism. But maybe Peircean pragmatism leads somewhere truly radical because it says our "reality" lies all curled up inside its own "a...
September 16, 2020 at 02:39
What was at the back of my mind here was the loop quantum gravity (LQG) picture of particles as knots or braided structures in a spacetime "spin netwo...
September 15, 2020 at 22:38
I was steering towards a discussion of chirality. That should have been obvious.
September 15, 2020 at 07:24
Yeah. I kind of gave up as soon as I started. So much that has to be unpacked here. :grin: But it is a good thread topic. The underlying metaphysical ...
September 15, 2020 at 04:29
Charge is to do with the way a particle spins, or rather its helicity - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chirality_(physics) So the difference betwee...
September 14, 2020 at 20:11
It is worth noting how the internet is actually all about the dialectic of connection and memory. So TCP/IP is half the story. The other half is havin...
September 13, 2020 at 00:56
If you can’t rule it out, then you need to provide your reasons. It is a scientific claim. So it is either supported by the evidence or not. Oh, if on...
September 12, 2020 at 02:44
In: Oil  — view comment
Sure. I understand that. What I questioned was the implication it could have a useful impact on the problems of peak fossil fuel and global warming. A...
September 12, 2020 at 02:17
In: Oil  — view comment
Is your argument that we just have to wait for depopulation to reduce the overall pressure on energy consumption and environmental degradation? That w...
September 12, 2020 at 01:39
Good reply. The curious thing is that @"JerseyFlight" says his perspective is Hegelian. But the Hegelian view of history was that it was a journey of ...
September 12, 2020 at 01:13
In: Oil  — view comment
The problem is that oil could sustain a global capitalism because it is so energy dense and transportable. Renewables are local energy creation and ma...
September 11, 2020 at 21:22
In: Oil  — view comment
The facts were in the article....
September 11, 2020 at 20:56
No. It is simply that you are discussing something else. Your peer to peer angle is talking about the blank canvas before the structure self organises...
September 11, 2020 at 06:46
Yeah, I give up. If you don’t get network theory, then I’ll leave it there.
September 11, 2020 at 06:15
In fact it does. It absolutely doesn’t. Like the OP, you are applying a lay concept of a hierarchy. I am defending something else.
September 11, 2020 at 06:13
So corporations, privatisation and deregulation meet the definition of cruel and oppressive state rule. Sounds legit.
September 11, 2020 at 05:26