You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

apokrisis

Comments

You are ignorant if you think that political and social landscapes aren't instead ruled by structural attractors. They have memories and thus place co...
June 28, 2023 at 21:23
Keep whistling. But I can see how tiny irrelevancies do set you off on ever wilder gyrations. You can’t follow the line of the argument.
June 28, 2023 at 11:14
Add chaos theory to the list of things you are not expert in. :rofl:
June 28, 2023 at 10:10
Agreed. A description or interpretation is open or vague in the way you describe as there is no value in being more precise than the occasion demands....
June 28, 2023 at 01:07
Do you accept the realism of the enactivist/pragmatist as having properly gone beyond Kant now? What we experience of the world is the self-centred re...
June 27, 2023 at 20:54
The cut in organisms separates the material dynamics that constitutes the physical world from the information or algorithms that are the regulating mo...
June 27, 2023 at 20:43
What can I say? My point was about labelling ourselves in predicate logic fashion as a bundle of atomic attributes. You started withering on about bei...
June 27, 2023 at 20:17
There are plenty of ecologically informed scientists who have fingered how we wound up in our current bind. The short answer is fossil fuels want to b...
June 27, 2023 at 03:22
Of course I agree. We don't use words as reductionist units of meaning. We use them to weave the webs of constraint I mention. We speak in sentences. ...
June 27, 2023 at 02:51
Flicking through a bit more of Lawson, I also want to point out how selfhood - the “reality” of the first person point of view - is a product of the c...
June 27, 2023 at 02:28
I’ve not read Lawson. A quick squizz suggests he is rather lightweight. :grin: The difference looks like being that jump from epistemology to ontology...
June 27, 2023 at 01:31
Peircean realism would be considered pretty idealistic by some. :razz: But it leads to pansemiosis rather than Panpsychism or other Cartesian stories....
June 27, 2023 at 01:00
The basic issue from a semiotic point of view is whether you consider meanings to be constructed or constrained. Does a word have to positively put yo...
June 27, 2023 at 00:36
Knowledge is the stabilisation of contradictions, not their resolution. The point is not to pull back the curtains but to discover the larger world th...
June 27, 2023 at 00:16
So you want to shift the argument from the general syntactical point – the conventions of mathematical logic - to one of social pragmatics? Sure, as I...
June 26, 2023 at 22:37
Complexity theory has the useful dichotomy of simplexity-complicity to show how simplicity and complexity are in fact connected in mirror fashion. The...
June 25, 2023 at 21:13
Clearly I was talking about predicates and not names when talking about self-labelling. A name makes no claim about the qualities you possess. But the...
June 25, 2023 at 20:55
And how useful is it to label yourself? Who benefits exactly? My own view is shaped by systems science. That says an organism relies on a dynamical ba...
June 24, 2023 at 22:17
I argued that it was invalid and gave reasons. Simple as.
June 24, 2023 at 11:34
Again, I was pointing out that it speaks to a reductionist metaphysics. What's so confusing? That I didn't reply in the same terms as if I might accep...
June 24, 2023 at 03:28
Good point. This goes to the prosocial behaviour a society must extract from the individuals that are going to compose it. It speaks to the difference...
June 24, 2023 at 02:44
I was framing my reply in the structuralist sense that the dichotomies that succeed and thus persist must be intrinsically complementary rather than a...
June 24, 2023 at 02:27
An intelligent point at last.
June 24, 2023 at 01:49
Oh the casual misogyny of celebrating the little homemakers who "are really in charge" because they tend your heirs just as your wonderful mum tended ...
June 24, 2023 at 01:47
Of course. But then again, as opposed to what? Humans need to be understood in terms of the dichotomies that give reality to the notion of life involv...
June 24, 2023 at 01:41
There is a ton of literature now analysing what is going on right under our collective noses. Fukuyama's book, Identity, is a good example. He tracks ...
June 24, 2023 at 01:09
I was addressing how to think. A question of epistemology. This is high on the bullet point list of things that make me “a philosopher”. :wink: Well t...
June 24, 2023 at 00:43
Ask a reductionist question and you get a reductionist answer. Masculinity gets defined as being the kind of matter which possess a certain collection...
June 23, 2023 at 03:01
Turchin is worth reading. Here's a precis of his argument...
June 18, 2023 at 03:16
:roll:
June 17, 2023 at 06:17
Dark matter might be as bad an example as you could pick for science and it’s willingness to follow the Peicean method of rational inquiry. There is s...
June 17, 2023 at 05:18
Neurobiology explains the embodied consciousness of an animal. Language and maths is what then promotes humans to the kind of selves that also live li...
June 17, 2023 at 03:20
Yep. Metaphysics reasons about possible worlds, cashing out as general logical argument. Science reasons about the actual world, cashing out in terms ...
June 17, 2023 at 01:56
Non-linearity is generic in nature. Newtonian physics is the special case. Every trajectory in nature is subject to a context of accident and fluctuat...
June 16, 2023 at 20:43
By a country mile, as one would expect.
June 16, 2023 at 20:07
So what is the cause that retards your progress as you try to push through the rush hour traffic constrained by the weight of other cars and all the s...
June 16, 2023 at 20:04
The Universe is the stable context which is then colonised by further hierarchical levels of dissipative complexity, like stars, blackholes and biofil...
June 16, 2023 at 04:52
Yep. :up: The systems approach is based on the four Aristotelean causes. So it dichotomises the notion of causality into two complementary types of ca...
June 16, 2023 at 03:28
As usual, you just don't listen to what I've said. So no point continuing. Life evolved metabolic power by learning to recycle its materials and thus ...
June 16, 2023 at 02:50
Stop making excuses for yourself. It is your lack of credible analysis and understanding of the subject matter itself.
June 15, 2023 at 20:11
If you were a Chinese peasant with paddy fields to manure, you would know that material recycling is what nature does. But keep blathering away. :yawn...
June 15, 2023 at 20:09
The rustle of sweet wrappers heard from the cheap seats.
June 15, 2023 at 20:06
An organism is a network of counterfactual switching. It is constructed of the very possibility to flip between polar opposites at any level of its hi...
June 15, 2023 at 10:42
Maybe I should have used scare quotes. I meant it is the general top-down constraint acting to shape the upwardly constructing degrees of freedom. So ...
June 15, 2023 at 09:25
Enough idiocy. A biological system is closed for its materials and open for its energy flow. It sets up the metabolic turbine that an environmental en...
June 15, 2023 at 03:16
Nope. The problem is you rabbit on about moddish stuff without having any technical understanding or metaphysical grounding. Thus your "thesis" amount...
June 15, 2023 at 00:05
Exactly. And that capacity is measured against the incapacity of a "gone to thermal equilibrium" system to do work. So energy as a measurable concept ...
June 14, 2023 at 23:46
But the biological system is still constrained by the Second Law. It can develop local negentropy because that overall increases the global entropy of...
June 14, 2023 at 22:16
I have no problem at all with either the metaphysics or physics of raw potential. Your problem is I understand all this stuff well enough to see that ...
June 14, 2023 at 21:23
You substantiate my point. :up:
June 14, 2023 at 09:06