You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

WhiskeyWhiskers

Comments

You're asking why it is a brute fact. It has no explanation because it's brute. It is good by definition.
December 13, 2015 at 18:41
Asking why virtue is good in itself and not allowing self-reference is incoherent. That virtue is good in itself is a brute fact, thus is requires no ...
December 13, 2015 at 18:38
"it's not the job of an ethical doctrine to tell what to do" - The Great Whatever, 2015.
December 10, 2015 at 08:29
The non-attachment part is correct (but how is this a bad thing?), but Stoicism certainly does not promote non-care, this is a technical term you've a...
December 09, 2015 at 13:15
Nailed it. Great post, couldn't have said it better.
November 30, 2015 at 14:55
One of my favourite pieces of fiction, ironically (Y)
November 29, 2015 at 09:19
Don't get me wrong, I know you had the best of intentions when starting this thread. My post wasn't aimed at you in particular, schopenhauer1, more at...
November 28, 2015 at 18:08
Spot on. I thought this was going to be an insightful and inquisitive comparison between pessimism and stoicism (my first post set out to be, anyway),...
November 28, 2015 at 11:25
That Hegel says stoicism is empty posturing says nothing of how effective stoicism is for other people. He didn't see it working for him, fair enough,...
November 17, 2015 at 22:38
1) Does the Stoic ethic provide an answer to the existential boredom/instrumentality/annoyances/negative experiences/desire/flux/becoming-and-never-be...
November 16, 2015 at 16:22