You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Michael

Comments

Works great for me. And I'm not a fan of CMSs like Wordpress and Magento. Thankfully I only really work with custom-made sites.
July 12, 2017 at 15:10
I was questioning what grammar has to do with truth makers, not with descriptions. The important part was what I said next: If we're using the corresp...
July 12, 2017 at 13:55
You're deflecting. Yes. But this is identical to seeing the green grass. Yes or no? I didn't say that facts weren't discovered. I said that scientific...
July 12, 2017 at 13:33
Why does grammar matter? If we're using the correspondence theory of truth, a proposition is true if it corresponds to a state-of-affairs, and if we'r...
July 12, 2017 at 13:08
And green grass can be observed. So what's the difference between observing green grass and observing the fact that the grass is green? If nothing the...
July 12, 2017 at 12:52
I might say that the green grass makes the proposition "the grass is green" true. You're saying that the facts are not the physical things that they'r...
July 12, 2017 at 12:45
I don't know what to make of this. I certainly don't think we can talk about expected evidence until we have a clear understanding of what a fact is. ...
July 12, 2017 at 12:29
Then how do we show that the fact is observer-independent? We can perhaps show that the thing is observer-independent, but if we say that the fact isn...
July 12, 2017 at 12:04
So the fact isn't the observer-independent physical thing?
July 12, 2017 at 11:58
Some certainly are. The fact that I'm watching you, for example. As for Wittgenstein, he says "facts cannot strictly speaking be defined, but we can e...
July 12, 2017 at 07:59
I think grandpa needs Internet lessons.
July 11, 2017 at 17:49
Hindenburg.
July 11, 2017 at 12:47
Or I could just shave my head and grow a beard. Then I won't look like the person in the video.
July 11, 2017 at 12:33
You have early onset dementia. It wasn't your hand. Tone, lowered. I'm channeling my inner @"Hanover" .
July 11, 2017 at 12:21
I don't shower. Or sing. Also, if you made a recording of me then you must already know where I live. To conclude, you're a terrible conman. And that'...
July 11, 2017 at 12:15
Given that Jesus Christ is the Truth, you just affirmed Wosret's claim.
July 11, 2017 at 11:47
But you're Canadian, so don't deserve my support. Does that make me racist?
July 11, 2017 at 11:41
I don't know how I sound. It's been years since I've heard a recording of myself.
July 11, 2017 at 11:39
We should have Theresa May debate someone like Joey Essex. Aside from the hilarity, it would give Wosret a good glimpse of the variety in British acce...
July 11, 2017 at 11:36
Cockney, Scouse, Geordie, West Country, Estuary, Received Pronunciation, Scottish, Welsh, Irish... There's a lot of British accents (and, yes, lots of...
July 11, 2017 at 11:21
Like a Rampant Rabbit?
July 11, 2017 at 11:05
But still True.
July 11, 2017 at 11:04
So the term "Truth" is just a meaningless label that's meant to sound impressive?
July 11, 2017 at 10:44
The latest date I can see is John, which was around 110 AD. But isn't a truth a true statement? So the Truth is the True Statement. Christ is the True...
July 11, 2017 at 10:39
Even if I know that Donald Trump is the President of the United States, it doesn't follow that "Donald Trump is the President of the United States" is...
July 10, 2017 at 15:12
I don't see how this follows. If one sentence is more informative than another then they don't refer to the same thing? I would say that "Andrew" and ...
July 10, 2017 at 15:07
No, because if it's true under one interpretation and false under another then it isn't both true and false in the same sense. It's true in one sense ...
July 09, 2017 at 22:06
I didn't say it was. I said that the truth or falsity of "X" depending on interpretation doesn't lead to a contradiction, contrary to your earlier cla...
July 09, 2017 at 22:03
But not both true and false in the same sense, given that whether or not its true depends upon the interpretation. So it doesn't conflict with the law...
July 09, 2017 at 21:44
That's why you're wrong with what you said here: The different interpretations are not the same sense, and so no contradiction arises if the truth or ...
July 09, 2017 at 21:19
You were discussing the claim that the truth of "X" depends upon an interpretation, and claiming that this entails that "X" can be both true and false...
July 09, 2017 at 21:09
A better account of the law of non-contradiction is "contradictory statements cannot both be true in the same sense at the same time". The in the same...
July 09, 2017 at 20:52
I think my edit pre-empted this response.
July 09, 2017 at 19:00
I wonder if perhaps "the death of Caesar" only refers to the event of his body shutting down whereas "the murder of Caesar" refers also to the events ...
July 09, 2017 at 18:54
I think this is a useful example of how meaning is different to reference. Both "it is raining" and "the weather outside" can refer to the same thing ...
July 09, 2017 at 15:56
But what does that have to do with the meaning of the word? You might intend for me to turn left, and this might cause you to say "turn right" – but a...
July 07, 2017 at 15:50
I didn't say that. I said that they're not the authority – they don't dictate what words mean – and that if Merriam-Webster doesn't account for the "v...
July 07, 2017 at 14:41
Ah, the Simpsons rationale. How fitting that yours is also yellow.
July 07, 2017 at 11:44
A wise American owl provides greater juxtaposition than a wise British owl. Am I right, @"Sapientia"?
July 07, 2017 at 11:42
Given that using the word "meaning" in the context of talking about value, as in "my girlfriend means a lot to me", is a conventional use of the term,...
July 06, 2017 at 14:31
It's a selfie.
July 06, 2017 at 11:36
Well, if you define computation as involving symbols, and if you define symbols as things that have a particular meaning to us, then it follows by def...
July 05, 2017 at 15:49
Whatever it means in the context of "the meaning of a word". According to Wittgenstein, and probably other philosophers, it would be wrong to interpre...
July 05, 2017 at 15:22
I'm not saying that you're conflating meaning and intention. I'm saying that you're conflating different meanings of "meaning"; the one which is "inte...
July 05, 2017 at 14:40
Again you're conflating. There's a difference between what someone intends when they speak and what the words mean. I might intend for you to turn lef...
July 05, 2017 at 14:27
This is very unclear. If the meaning of a word is some physical thing that it refers to (say an apple), then if I eat that physical thing then I've ea...
July 05, 2017 at 13:56
So for something to count as computation, the output has to be useful? Then how about the physical processes that brought about the Sun, or DNA? I thi...
July 05, 2017 at 13:15
But what does that mean? If it's just a case of taking some input, doing something with it, and then outputting the result, then every physical proces...
July 05, 2017 at 13:03
So they're contingent facts. But are they brute, or can them having the values they have (in whichever possible world) be explained by something else?
July 05, 2017 at 11:11
Brute facts. Are there facts that do not have explanations? For example, why do the physical constants have the values they have? Does this question h...
July 05, 2017 at 10:06