You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Michael

Comments

And I think this is exactly the issue behind the argument between the direct and indirect realist. The direct realist (or at least the naive realist) ...
November 02, 2017 at 13:30
Presumably the same thing that makes a direct realist so sure that there has to be something responsible for the experience (so sure that the things w...
November 02, 2017 at 13:25
I think you missed my edit: "or just 'noumena' if you don't even want to be a realist about the Standard Model".
November 02, 2017 at 13:21
That's the wrong way to look at it. It's like saying that "playing chess" is a fictional account of the deterministic movements of a computer. It's be...
November 02, 2017 at 13:19
I think one can be a realist about the fundamentals (e.g quantum mechanics and the Standard Model) but an anti-realist about macroscopic objects. Allo...
November 02, 2017 at 13:16
That doesn't follow.
November 02, 2017 at 13:15
You mean an anti-realist can't be a scientific realist and instead has to be an instrumentalist? Perhaps. But so what? Are you suggesting that anti-re...
November 02, 2017 at 13:10
Considering my coffee example, where our bodies are the water, the external stimulus is the coffee beans, and our experience is the interaction betwee...
November 02, 2017 at 13:03
What I was saying is that the properties of the experience (e.g. colour and taste) are not properties of the external stimulus (e.g. the apple). As a ...
November 02, 2017 at 12:57
They might have a shape, but that shape isn't anything like a shape as seen or as felt. I think you're committing the same error of conflation that so...
November 02, 2017 at 11:26
I don't think so. As studies have shown, there's no a priori connection between shapes-as-seen and shapes-as-felt. Those born blind who later gain sig...
November 02, 2017 at 11:12
Well, I would add to this that we also mean that the same external stimulus is causally responsible for the experience.
November 02, 2017 at 11:04
So direct realism is as described in the Wikipedia article (even though so many have taken issue with it when I bring it up): There exists a world of ...
November 02, 2017 at 11:02
But then, if the image differed, was there a shared object of perception? Some were aware of a black and blue dress and some were aware of a white and...
November 02, 2017 at 10:50
I'm asking for the distinction between perceiving a mind-independent object and perceiving a mental image. I don't get it. Both the direct and the ind...
November 02, 2017 at 10:47
So are you saying that the image of a tree is the tree, or that there's no such thing as the image of a tree? And what are dreams/hallucinations if no...
November 02, 2017 at 10:30
And what do you mean by direct access to the external world? Presumably you're not saying that my experiences are the tree, because that would be subj...
November 02, 2017 at 09:52
I agree with this. I think it's analogous to the difference between saying "I'm reading words" and saying "I'm reading about World War II". When the i...
November 02, 2017 at 09:05
A painting of a tree is made of paint, but of a tree. And so the experience of a tree might be "made of" mental stuff, but be of a tree.
November 01, 2017 at 16:20
To refer back to an example I've given before, a painting of a tree isn't a painting of paint, but it is just paint – paint which 'represents' a tree....
November 01, 2017 at 10:49
I would say that they're the same in that both waking and dream experiences are constituted of sense-data/qualia. They're different in that in the cas...
November 01, 2017 at 10:31
It isn't. You want to talk about it in terms of the computer recognising shapes as we do, and so conclude that shapes are mind-independent things. But...
October 31, 2017 at 23:42
I don't think this is right. Presumably these neural networks simply recognise patterns in the magnetism on the hard drive, that although covariant wi...
October 31, 2017 at 12:23
So enactivism?
October 31, 2017 at 12:10
I thought we were going with the "won’t happen, but we can always wish".
October 31, 2017 at 10:24
Plot twist: Agustino is actually Sapientia.
October 31, 2017 at 09:55
Or, Trump resigns (or is removed) and the Government pursues him further to determine if he's committed any crimes, and if so charge him. And then Oba...
October 31, 2017 at 09:21
Implying that you're a dickhead? :P You just keep setting me up today.
October 30, 2017 at 16:02
George Papadopoulos is the second? This one is directly about the Trump campaign and Russia. He's admitted to lying to the FBI about his communication...
October 30, 2017 at 14:29
Incidentally, I've read that the reason these charges are coming so soon is because the statute of limitations runs out on some of these charges tomor...
October 30, 2017 at 14:02
I've heard that there's a second indictment, which some are saying is likely Flynn, but they may have just meant a second person which would be Gates ...
October 30, 2017 at 13:54
It's regarding the money stuff. Conspiracy against the Department of Justice and Department of the Treasury. You can read it all here.
October 30, 2017 at 13:53
Money laundering was what I expected.
October 30, 2017 at 13:15
Paul Manafort, Who Once Ran Trump Campaign, Told to Surrender The charges aren't known yet.
October 30, 2017 at 11:53
There's a joke somewhere here about snappy piranhas.
October 30, 2017 at 11:48
She can get you for the incorrect spelling of "actually", though.
October 30, 2017 at 11:35
Sure, but it might still be true. For example, if we take the current number system, and assume that we hadn't yet measured the value of Pi, would it ...
October 30, 2017 at 11:31
Earlier you said "I always thought that we had some preexisting fundamental truths, and mathematics attempts to map these truths to formal statements....
October 30, 2017 at 11:25
-0 > -1
October 30, 2017 at 11:14
Yes, just looked into it. "to" is mainly British, "for" is mainly American.
October 30, 2017 at 11:13
To all extents and purposes intents and purposes incestuous porpoises.
October 30, 2017 at 11:09
No, but so what? Regulations don't stop business. People had work and consumers had goods to buy under Obama. Perhaps more work and goods would be ava...
October 30, 2017 at 09:53
Anyway, should we place bets on who's going to be indicted today? I'd say Manafort is the best bet. Flynn, Page, and Stone are possible. Also heard th...
October 30, 2017 at 09:50
More people will suffer if the environment isn't protected, if workers aren't protected, and if consumers aren't protected.
October 30, 2017 at 09:48
Perhaps. There are always going to be people who lose out, whether it's the big business owners, the small business owners, the consumers, the workers...
October 30, 2017 at 09:42
Nothing's wrong with that per se. It just doesn't mean that Trump is capable.
October 30, 2017 at 09:35
Regulations protect workers, consumers, and the environment.
October 30, 2017 at 09:35
He is incapable. Investors believing that he'll implement policies that will benefit them isn't the same as being capable.
October 30, 2017 at 09:33
I assume because investors believe that Trump will cut down on regulations that will allow them to make even more money, and so investor confidence is...
October 30, 2017 at 09:22
What is that supposed to show? Here's the last 5 years: /uploads/files/r9/5r04npi1ev0bvt8s.png The stock market tends to go up.
October 30, 2017 at 09:20