You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Michael

Comments

You don't need to figure it out. You need to actually do it, whatever's going on in your head. Just as you there's no first number to count to, making...
February 08, 2019 at 13:25
I don't know what you mean by a mathematical task. Walking 1m requires physically passing through the 0.5m mark, and before that physically passing th...
February 08, 2019 at 13:23
If I want to count in order the 1/(2n) numbers between 0 and 1, which is the first number I count? If I want to move from 0m to 1m which is the first ...
February 08, 2019 at 13:16
The problem is that it is no more possible to pass through each 1/(2n) unit of distance than it is to count each 1/(2n). It's a task that can't even s...
February 08, 2019 at 13:10
If motion is continuous (and space infinitely divisible) then I must pass through each 1/(2n) unit of distance (even if I don't stop at them), and sur...
February 08, 2019 at 13:02
Or the paradox shows that reality isn't as we think it is, e.g. space isn't infinitely divisible and/or motion isn't continuous.
February 08, 2019 at 12:58
It doesn't resolve the dichotomy paradox.
February 08, 2019 at 12:53
If it's impossible to pass through in order the rational-numbered distances between 0m and 1m and if it's possible to travel from 0m to 1m then when w...
February 08, 2019 at 10:51
I'm claiming that it's impossible to count in order the rational numbers between 0 and 1 and that for the exact same reason it's impossible to pass th...
February 08, 2019 at 10:17
I’m looking more at the dichotomy paradox. We can’t say that it’s possible to count in ascending order the rational numbers between 0 and 1 by using t...
February 08, 2019 at 08:56
Perhaps the flaw is the premise that motion is continuous? Perhaps motion is possible precisely because distance isn’t infinitely divisible.
February 08, 2019 at 08:40
That solution begs the question as it takes as a premise that some finite distance can be travelled.
February 08, 2019 at 08:36
I don’t think that’s true of all his paradoxes. It’s not about time but about completing (or even starting) a supertask. From the Wikipedia article:
February 08, 2019 at 08:27
So you care more about the life of the foetus than you do about the life and health of the pregnant woman. Others are the reverse. How are we to deter...
February 07, 2019 at 18:00
The decision has to be approved by a physician who should be unbiased and guided by his medical expertise. Why should we require certainty? Medicine a...
February 07, 2019 at 17:55
Our options are: 1. Abortion after the second trimester is not allowed 2. Abortion after the second trimester is only allowed if the mother's life is ...
February 07, 2019 at 16:48
Is it more dangerous than not allowing a woman whose health is at risk from getting an abortion (after the second trimester)?
February 07, 2019 at 16:41
It doesn't specify. But it does seem to just be codifying the ruling in Roe v. Wade which includes this section:
February 07, 2019 at 15:08
The bill states: In fact it still requires a doctor for the second trimester: I believe the only way someone other than a doctor (but still a health c...
January 31, 2019 at 22:08
That one at least does specify that " allows for abortions up to the point of birth if the life or health of the mother is deemed at risk or the baby ...
January 31, 2019 at 21:48
Maybe I'm looking at the wrong law, but the text of this bill says: So termination up to the due date is only permissible if the mother's life or heal...
January 31, 2019 at 10:09
In: Brexit  — view comment
Maybe I should move my money into a stronger currency, like the Vietnamese Dong.
January 30, 2019 at 21:00
In: Brexit  — view comment
Hopefully the Government and Parliament change their minds. It is projected that a no-deal Brexit will throw the UK into recession.
January 30, 2019 at 20:57
In: Brexit  — view comment
I meant pass an Act of Parliament to revoke Article 50 if a deal is not approved. The ECJ ruled that:
January 30, 2019 at 20:52
In: Brexit  — view comment
I was optimistic that Parliament would veto a no deal Brexit and revoke Article 50 when it became clear that a deal won't be made. But then yesterday ...
January 30, 2019 at 18:53
In: Brexit  — view comment
According to Sap it's just a negotiating tactic and they'll relent eventually.
January 30, 2019 at 18:44
I'm yet to hear an answer to the question I asked you earlier. I'll remind you of our exchange.
January 24, 2019 at 22:23
I'm not making an argument from the law. I'm making an argument about what we value.
January 24, 2019 at 22:16
So we're concerned about the potential future of the foetus (to be a deformed child). Yet a lot of those who are pro-life say that it isn't reasonable...
January 24, 2019 at 22:00
Yet that tends not to by why we condemn pregnant women who smoke. It’s nothing like the person who decides to kick a football against a window where w...
January 24, 2019 at 21:43
The same can be said of the pro-choice who accuse the pro-life of dictating what women can do with their bodies. Do we not all admonish pregnant women...
January 24, 2019 at 21:25
Got my raise :up:
January 23, 2019 at 18:41
So it’s unlike the hypothetical case of a police officer shooting someone they believe, incorrectly, to be carrying a gun, when it’s actually a toy - ...
January 23, 2019 at 08:35
So it’s acceptable to criminalise abortion after 28 weeks but immoral to criminalise abortion after 10 weeks?
January 23, 2019 at 08:30
What about after 10 days when the blastocyst becomes an embryo, or after 10 weeks when the embryo becomes a foetus? And if pro-life proponents genuine...
January 23, 2019 at 07:46
I don't think it right to say that human dignity inheres in anything. Rather, like any value, it's projected onto others by us. Some value the life of...
January 23, 2019 at 00:48
Had abortion been legal my mother would have aborted me. That would have been a grave injustice to the world, and so it is right that abortion wasn’t ...
January 22, 2019 at 20:01
In: Brexit  — view comment
:lol:
January 22, 2019 at 08:36
Not enough info. What are the tax brackets? How much are the expenses for things like food, clothes, and gigolos? Does she live in a neighborhood with...
January 20, 2019 at 17:13
He already gets more pay than me. He ain't that lucky.
January 19, 2019 at 21:36
Unlike Brexit I'll have a plan in place before I hand in my notice.
January 19, 2019 at 18:41
Lawyers don’t wear shoes. You all have cloven hoofs. Or is it your version of stamp collecting? Probably with the owners’ feet still inside. I know ho...
January 19, 2019 at 17:19
Nah, being spiteful to someone being paid more than me would make me feel even more pathetic. I'll just tell my boss that I want to be paid more and i...
January 18, 2019 at 19:36
I just got a pay rise two months ago after my promotion. Although it's actually currently half a pay rise as I don't get the full amount until May. An...
January 18, 2019 at 18:46
My company just hired someone new who’ll be working under me (cause I’m the lead) but they’ve offered him more money than they’re paying me because th...
January 18, 2019 at 17:59
In: Brexit  — view comment
Can’t be followed through without consequence either. And as I’ve said before, my crystal ball is telling me that the consequences of Brexit - especia...
January 18, 2019 at 08:32
In: Brexit  — view comment
The government must remove the prospect of the catastrophe of Brexit.
January 17, 2019 at 20:43
Doesn’t have quite the same ring as “I have a dream”.
January 15, 2019 at 17:58
You mean something like "If I had a daughter then she'd be..."?
January 08, 2019 at 18:41
Yes, there are consequences. But so what? Those consequences don't entail that God is forced not to make the stone, that omnipotence is incoherent, or...
January 08, 2019 at 07:51