How is that any different to simply stating that it's false that houses turn into flowers? And what about other kinds of falsehoods? To borrow your wo...
I once wrote a great R-rated short story about Jack and Jill and I think a gingerbread house. Posted it as part of the old PF's short story competitio...
I’m not saying that the physical part exhausts the concept. I’m saying that even if there’s more to the concept than the physical part we can still as...
I'm not saying that we don't have the concept of flowers and houses. I'm saying that these concepts don't preclude us from talking about houses turnin...
I'm not a scientist so I can't offer much of an explanation. I only know that it's concerned with the combining or splitting of atoms so that one elem...
Because we know that it's impossible for houses to turn into flowers. Whereas if she were to say that the tree in her garden became a shed we wouldn't...
I agree with this, but I don't see how this precludes the conceptual possibility of houses turning into flowers. It's no different in kind to mercury ...
I don't really understand this. There's nothing theological about saying that things in the world are made up of matter and that matter of one type ca...
Perhaps this example will better explain the issue I have: I'm your neighbour and I tell you that my friend John is coming to visit. John cancels but ...
The trick is to campaign for him so that the voters think he's declared his candidacy and vote for him, even though he hasn't because he's too proper ...
I'm not a fan of Tinder. I can't stand cheesy/sexual chat up lines and "normal" conversations via text are so boring. Nothing beats meeting people in ...
Sure, I didn't mean to say that it is impossible. We can transmute mercury into gold, and things like that happen naturally in nuclear fusion. The cas...
I've seen a lot of reporting like that and I think it's pretty bad. There's a difference between being stupid and not knowing that something is illega...
Yes, that's what I quoted. The part that surprised me is this: "a prosecution would encounter difficulties proving that Campaign officials or individu...
Maybe not philosophy but I'd say we need science to determine that the molecules that make up a house can't feasibly rearrange into the molecules that...
I was talking about the Trump Tower meeting which is concerned with campaign finance violations, not being an agent of the Russian government. Mueller...
I'm surprised that ignorance actually was a defense in this case: So they broke the law but they can't be prosecuted because it can't be proved that t...
Is that what we intend though? Imagine some historian were to (falsely) believe that his friend Artabanus assassinated Xerxes and wrote the sentence "...
I think the case of Superman and Clark Kent presents some issue here. If I believe that Superman and Clark Kent are different people then I intend for...
I don't think that it's a double-standard to think that one country's legal system is better than another's if there are material differences between ...
What else are the EU supposed to do? Deny the request and have us leave without a deal? They don't want that. The problem is entirely with Parliament ...
As it followed on from you saying "Yes, but less so. It depends on what would need to be done to save them" I assumed you were explaining why you feel...
Earlier you said "I'm not a utilitarian. I don't 'deduce' that killing is wrong by some kind of calculus, it just feels wrong." so the above seems at ...
If I allow the train to continue on Track A then there is a 100% chance that 2 or more people will die and a 25% chance that 3 people will die. If I r...
My decision would be the same in both cases because your addition makes no difference; I would redirect the train to save 2 people. Could you explain ...
Comments