You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Michael

Comments

How is that any different to simply stating that it's false that houses turn into flowers? And what about other kinds of falsehoods? To borrow your wo...
April 24, 2019 at 15:07
He's been exiled back to the old PF. Which happens to be nowhere. So bye-bye Maw forever!
April 24, 2019 at 13:30
I once wrote a great R-rated short story about Jack and Jill and I think a gingerbread house. Posted it as part of the old PF's short story competitio...
April 24, 2019 at 09:36
Maw has now been banned.
April 24, 2019 at 08:52
I’m not saying that the physical part exhausts the concept. I’m saying that even if there’s more to the concept than the physical part we can still as...
April 24, 2019 at 07:23
I just need a novel topic. Does God exist? Are morals objective? Do we have free will? So many choices.
April 23, 2019 at 16:59
For example, I haven’t started a discussion in 2 years.
April 23, 2019 at 16:44
The angel is the guy.
April 23, 2019 at 16:38
I’m glad we don’t have Google Ads.
April 23, 2019 at 16:38
Isn't that the place started by one of the old PF crowd (Floyd I believe)? He didn't like it when I called him Pink.
April 23, 2019 at 14:52
I'm not saying that we don't have the concept of flowers and houses. I'm saying that these concepts don't preclude us from talking about houses turnin...
April 22, 2019 at 17:47
I'm not a scientist so I can't offer much of an explanation. I only know that it's concerned with the combining or splitting of atoms so that one elem...
April 22, 2019 at 17:36
The ones pertaining to nuclear fusion and fission primarily.
April 22, 2019 at 17:30
Because we know that it's impossible for houses to turn into flowers. Whereas if she were to say that the tree in her garden became a shed we wouldn't...
April 22, 2019 at 17:17
I agree with this, but I don't see how this precludes the conceptual possibility of houses turning into flowers. It's no different in kind to mercury ...
April 22, 2019 at 13:51
I don't really understand this. There's nothing theological about saying that things in the world are made up of matter and that matter of one type ca...
April 22, 2019 at 10:48
Perhaps this example will better explain the issue I have: I'm your neighbour and I tell you that my friend John is coming to visit. John cancels but ...
April 19, 2019 at 09:52
Posted to get the above to show
April 19, 2019 at 00:04
The trick is to campaign for him so that the voters think he's declared his candidacy and vote for him, even though he hasn't because he's too proper ...
April 18, 2019 at 23:25
In: On sex  — view comment
I'm not a fan of Tinder. I can't stand cheesy/sexual chat up lines and "normal" conversations via text are so boring. Nothing beats meeting people in ...
April 18, 2019 at 23:11
Sure, I didn't mean to say that it is impossible. We can transmute mercury into gold, and things like that happen naturally in nuclear fusion. The cas...
April 18, 2019 at 23:05
I've seen a lot of reporting like that and I think it's pretty bad. There's a difference between being stupid and not knowing that something is illega...
April 18, 2019 at 23:01
Yes, that's what I quoted. The part that surprised me is this: "a prosecution would encounter difficulties proving that Campaign officials or individu...
April 18, 2019 at 22:27
Maybe not philosophy but I'd say we need science to determine that the molecules that make up a house can't feasibly rearrange into the molecules that...
April 18, 2019 at 22:24
I was talking about the Trump Tower meeting which is concerned with campaign finance violations, not being an agent of the Russian government. Mueller...
April 18, 2019 at 22:03
I was referring to Don Jr. (and others at the Trump Tower meeting), not to President Trump.
April 18, 2019 at 21:47
I'm surprised that ignorance actually was a defense in this case: So they broke the law but they can't be prosecuted because it can't be proved that t...
April 18, 2019 at 21:09
You should do less of that and more campaigning for Obama.
April 18, 2019 at 20:38
Is that what we intend though? Imagine some historian were to (falsely) believe that his friend Artabanus assassinated Xerxes and wrote the sentence "...
April 18, 2019 at 20:36
Pfft. Also, from your link:
April 18, 2019 at 20:15
Have Obama run for Vice President with the unspoken promise that the President resign immediately.
April 18, 2019 at 19:18
I think the case of Superman and Clark Kent presents some issue here. If I believe that Superman and Clark Kent are different people then I intend for...
April 18, 2019 at 18:44
In: Assange  — view comment
I don't think that it's a double-standard to think that one country's legal system is better than another's if there are material differences between ...
April 18, 2019 at 16:23
Cheater.
April 18, 2019 at 06:28
In: Assange  — view comment
They didn't really need to as it's against UK law to extradite anyone who could face the death penalty anyway.
April 17, 2019 at 19:09
If you have three you have three, if you have two you have two, but if you have one you have none. What is it?
April 17, 2019 at 18:11
Pig brains partially revived four hours after death One step closer to immortality. :party:
April 17, 2019 at 17:18
In: Assange  — view comment
He also needs to be tried in the UK for failing to surrender to the court and in Sweden for rape (should they reopen charges).
April 17, 2019 at 16:56
I was awesome. Still am, but also was.
April 15, 2019 at 08:32
If anyone spoils Game of Thrones for me I will ban them with extreme prejudice. That is all.
April 15, 2019 at 08:19
Just busy with real life
April 14, 2019 at 13:04
Right behind you. I literally just said.
April 14, 2019 at 12:51
I’m right behind you. :eyes:
April 14, 2019 at 07:00
In: Brexit  — view comment
What else are the EU supposed to do? Deny the request and have us leave without a deal? They don't want that. The problem is entirely with Parliament ...
April 11, 2019 at 12:55
As it followed on from you saying "Yes, but less so. It depends on what would need to be done to save them" I assumed you were explaining why you feel...
April 05, 2019 at 12:32
Earlier you said "I'm not a utilitarian. I don't 'deduce' that killing is wrong by some kind of calculus, it just feels wrong." so the above seems at ...
April 05, 2019 at 10:10
What are you doing in Scotland?
April 05, 2019 at 07:26
Does it feel wrong to allow someone to die when you could have saved them?
April 05, 2019 at 07:20
If I allow the train to continue on Track A then there is a 100% chance that 2 or more people will die and a 25% chance that 3 people will die. If I r...
April 04, 2019 at 17:49
My decision would be the same in both cases because your addition makes no difference; I would redirect the train to save 2 people. Could you explain ...
April 04, 2019 at 16:57