You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Michael

Comments

Because the media aren't posting comments on here, whereas you are. But less flippantly, I went over that here. Journalists were told by sources they ...
July 10, 2020 at 16:55
That, contrary to your claim, it isn't just gossip.
July 10, 2020 at 16:40
It wasn't credible enough for him to do anything, but was proved enough to worry him, and was credible enough that the Trump administration did someth...
July 10, 2020 at 16:23
I'm not using any euphemism. I'm using the exact word that O'Brien and McKenzie used.
July 10, 2020 at 16:04
It was credible enough to spend months preparing options and to brief allies and to worry that general.
July 10, 2020 at 16:01
You said " wasn’t raised to attention because it wasn’t credible intel and could not be corroborated. It’s gossip. So it’s no surprise opponents have ...
July 10, 2020 at 15:52
He didn't say that the Russia bounties is a hoax. He says that "we've been working for several months on options for the President". I don't think the...
July 10, 2020 at 15:35
I'll quote myself from last week as you seem to have forgotten: It's more than gossip.
July 10, 2020 at 14:57
Not when the position you're trying to refute is a position that says that some contradictions are true.
July 09, 2020 at 13:21
Married men don't need to wear a wedding band and bachelors can if they like. And neither needs to be doing "married" or "bachelor" things to be marri...
July 08, 2020 at 21:22
So I can't draw a married man who isn't wearing a ring or a bachelor who is?
July 08, 2020 at 20:49
Then you're just begging the question by asserting that contradictions are impossible. That's not a refutation of dialetheism, it's just a denial of i...
July 08, 2020 at 20:39
So now you're saying that things can only be the case if they can be drawn? What about dark matter? And how would a drawing of a bachelor, a married m...
July 08, 2020 at 20:14
You're begging the question then. You were using the fact that we can't picture married-bachelors and square-circles as proof that they can't be real,...
July 08, 2020 at 19:43
I'm not sure what you mean by "exactly" as you haven't resolved the inconsistency of your position. I was addressing this: You seem to be saying that ...
July 08, 2020 at 17:17
What do you mean by symbolize? How does it differ from picturing? It's not just about being able to say the words is it? As you said before "the fact ...
July 08, 2020 at 17:02
And on the other side I can picture impossible objects like a Penrose triangle, so looking to what we can or can't imagine just doesn't seem like the ...
July 08, 2020 at 16:58
There are more stars in the universe than I can picture at any one time, yet presumably they still all exist at the same time. Our brains/minds are po...
July 08, 2020 at 16:51
The effect isn't the cause. The map isn't the territory. The woman isn't the painting of the woman. If you want to say that things can only be the cas...
July 08, 2020 at 16:44
Then you're contradicting yourself. Here you claimed that things can't be the case if we can't picture them in our mind, and now you're saying that th...
July 08, 2020 at 13:56
This doesn't answer my question. Can you picture a cup without just picturing how a cup appears to us? Can you picture just the innate nature of the c...
July 08, 2020 at 13:42
So you can picture the way a cup is, irrespective of its appearance?
July 08, 2020 at 13:37
So you're an idealist now? Or are you saying that cups have some innate appearance, irrespective of what they look and feel like to us?
July 08, 2020 at 13:34
Do you think that this undermines realism? Can you picture a cup without picturing the look of a cup, or the feel of a cup, i.e. how a cup is experien...
July 08, 2020 at 13:26
Are you saying that things can only be the case if we can picture them in our mind?
July 07, 2020 at 15:23
https://twitter.com/PlushForums/status/1280143258434392064
July 07, 2020 at 09:43
I don't think this is quite the right interpretation (at least with respect to "Banno likes vanilla ice cream"). It's not that the truth of a statemen...
July 07, 2020 at 08:08
If the left and right sides were different then they wouldn't be equal. What do you think the equals sign is? You don't seem to understand the differe...
July 06, 2020 at 17:43
So you understand the importance of journalists reporting on non-public information and keeping their sources anonymous? They ought not be dismissed j...
July 05, 2020 at 22:01
I think the story, and source protection, is more important. Whether or not Russia is paying bounties and whether or not Trump was briefed matters far...
July 05, 2020 at 19:26
So skipping right to 2030?
July 03, 2020 at 20:53
I'll just comment on this. You're right that decimal representation is exclusive to base 10 because that's what the word "decimal" means. Poor wording...
July 03, 2020 at 10:24
It is true. You just don't understand maths. If 9_{10}=10_{9} then \frac{1}{9_{10}}=\frac{1}{10_9} If fractions bother you then we can use exponents i...
July 02, 2020 at 12:49
According to this, "some of Trump’s own senior intelligence officials viewed the information as credible enough to warn the Pentagon and allies so the...
July 02, 2020 at 07:03
\frac{1}{10} = 0.1. This is equivalent to \frac{1}{2} = 0.5 in base 10. Nine hasn't been excluded as a number. There are nine apples in the picture ab...
July 01, 2020 at 13:26
There is no problem. If you accept that 9 in base 10 and 10 in base 9 are the very same number (which they are), then you must accept that \frac{1}{9}...
July 01, 2020 at 12:54
And do you understand what bases are? Do you understand that 9 in base 10 and 10 in base 9 are the very same number? To explain that, let's count the ...
July 01, 2020 at 12:51
It's \frac{1}{10} = 0.1. I'm just specifying that I'm using base 9 numerals instead of the traditional base 10. Although in this case it isn't strictl...
July 01, 2020 at 12:43
And as we've tried to explain, it isn't a problem. \frac{1}{10_9} = 0.1_9 Is there a problem with the number 0.1_9?
July 01, 2020 at 12:37
It doesn't have its own numbers. It has its own numerals. 1111 in binary, F in hexadecimal, and XV in Roman numerals aren't different numbers to 15 in...
July 01, 2020 at 07:23
It's been mentioned before but it's worth mentioning again. \frac{1}{9} in base 10 is equal to \frac{1}{10} in base 9, so 0.111... in base 10 is equal...
June 30, 2020 at 13:03
Mathematicians aren't making mistakes. \frac{1}{9} is a number and 0.999...=1. If you don't understand this then you don't understand mathematics. I s...
June 30, 2020 at 12:50
The bigger story right now is the Russia bounties. Even the Republicans are speaking out against this. Given their response to the Benghazi attack, I ...
June 30, 2020 at 05:28
So it's just you against the world of mathematics. If that can't convince you that your views are the problem, not mathematics, then I don't think any...
June 30, 2020 at 05:22
I thought we were discussing the accuracy of tim's claim that "all mathematics is addition"? I don't know about all maths but that seems to be the cas...
June 29, 2020 at 19:25
Negative numbers are not the same thing as subtraction. Negative numbers are defined as the additive inverse of the positive numbers, and then subtrac...
June 29, 2020 at 19:07
From here: And exponents can be defined by muliplications and multiplications by additions.
June 29, 2020 at 18:36
\underbrace{y+...+y}_y=-\frac{1}{2} Solve for y.
June 29, 2020 at 18:01
\frac{1}{9} = 0.111..._{10} = 0.1_{9}
June 29, 2020 at 16:08
Iran issues arrest warrant for Trump, asks Interpol to help
June 29, 2020 at 13:41