Michael

Only one of those has something to do with what we are discussing. https://www.docdroid.net/57t8V1q/clarke-2019-extened-clinical-assessment-pdf#page=6...

And the other two surveys weren't. Are you saying that you don't have a source? If not then why do you believe that there is a high rate of regret? If...

Then could you link me your non-biased source that shows a high degree of transition regret? Also I don't think https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/248721...

https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/media-s-detransition-narrative-fueling-misconceptions-trans-advocates-say-n1102686

What are these factual distinctions? Words like "male", "female", "him", and "her" existed long before we knew anything about DNA. DNA is just the blu...

I posted his question in my post:

@"DavidJohnson" You need to clarify what you mean by different characters. Is the number 22 two different characters or 1 repeated character?

esevene 333

He is saying that there is a single answer, let's say "xxx". The first character is an answer to the question "What is the third character (number, le...

Why would that be relevant to the puzzle? It doesn't ask you to think of a word.

Where does Púrpura come from?

Yes. Your questions don't entail a single possible answer.

a2a

Would you refer to someone with XX male syndrome using "he" or "she" (or both or neither)? According to who or what? How we actually use language dete...

What are these "necessary" attributes?

What determines someone to be a man or a woman? Genotype? Phenotype? Psychology? Social role? Naming?

Sorry, I've been too busy the last few days to come on here, and I guess the other moderators are the same. They've been approved now and as you have ...

https://twitter.com/realLizUSA/status/1487937248138088450

Hanover has two fathers obviously. Get with the times.

Then I guess whether or not you like the name "British Isles" is irrelevant?

I liked the part where Marco died at the end.

I think that the stock market is just a game that rich people play with each other and I don't care if a few hundred of them have advance knowledge to...

The attack was a real thing as well. People were hurt. It might not have had a chance of succeeding, but it did far more harm than Pelosi buying or se...

You think Pelosi's insider trading matters but that a violent attempt to prevent the certification of the Presidential election doesn't?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXWMNcCbqiM

I'm not saying it's true because he said it. I'm pointing out that if even Republicans like Mitch McConnell and Ted Cruz are using such language to de...

https://twitter.com/LeaderMcConnell/status/1346993833939238914 Even Mitch McConnell called it a "failed insurrection" (1:43). Trying to frame this as ...

https://twitter.com/SenTedCruz/status/1347089034846330880 Bloody Democrats. Trying to politicise a peaceful protest.

I'll remind you of something I said at the very start of our discussion: In practice people just use the phrases "it is true that it is raining" and "...

I think what's happening is that you start by arguing that the truth is what someone believes, I prove that wrong, you try to save your position by sa...

We are talking specifically about its meaning in the context of the JTB definition of knowledge. For me to know that there is a desk next to my bed I ...

Rep. Liz Cheney says Trump sat in the White House dining room and watched the Capitol riot unfold on TV instead of taking immediate action to stop the...

I don't know what you mean by a methodology. To say that "it is raining" is true is to say that it is raining, and it is raining if there are clouds a...

Yes. The thing that makes "it is raining" true isn't the same thing that makes "it is sunny" true. That should be obvious. No. Defining it as "P is tr...

Depends on what P is. If it's "it is raining" then it's satisfied if the physical events in the atmosphere (that happen regardless of our beliefs) are...

We don't need to first know that each of the three conditions are satisfied for us to then have knowledge (that's impossible in principle, we require ...

Except that's not what you've been saying. You've been saying that the truth is what a community of epistemic peers with access to every conceivable t...

The below is the claim of yours that I have been arguing against: It is. There is a difference between "S's belief that p is sufficiently reasonable g...

And the JTB definition is saying something like "you need a whiskey cup and a teacup" and your responses are saying something like "this is redundant,...

You're changing your position again. You were saying that the truth is what a community of epistemic peers with access to every conceivable technology...

I’m saying that a belief being true isn’t sufficient for it to count as knowledge. A lucky guess isn’t knowledge. A true belief brought about by a Tar...

Justification doesn’t require certainty. Justifications can be fallible. I’m pretty sure you’ve accepted this before, although I can’t be bothered to ...

They’re only knowledge if they’re also true (if a community of epistemic peers would also believe it were they to throw every conceivable test at it)....

That the truth can be used as a justification isn’t that a belief being true is the same thing as a belief being justified. If you want to argue that ...

If you can’t maintain a consistent argument - if you continually say contradictory things - then your argument has failed. The “actual justifications ...

It’s not the only justification (in fact I would say it’s rarely the justification as we rarely throw every conceivable test at our beliefs and certai...

It may be that a community of epistemic peers would come to believe that it is raining once they've exhaustively tested the hypothesis but if I believ...

In the context of the JTB definition of knowledge, the J refers to the individual having good reasons to believe what they do. Even if you want to und...

If we’re wrong then we don’t have knowledge. That’s why knowledge is said to be JTB, not just JB. Here:

So truth is a counterfactual? Something that is inaccessible? At the very least you finally understand that truth is distinct from the actual justific...