It seems like the thought you were having was something like this: 1. If something promotes arrogance, it is immoral. 2. Christianity promotes arrogan...
Hi Maureen, it seems like your post had the following argument: 1. If Christians actually knew that their God exists, then they could easily provide i...
I think I agree with you that premise 2 is objectionable. I was curious on what your objection to premise 2 was since you mentioned refuting it, but y...
I know you said premise 3 was the most contentious, but premise 2 seems like the most contentious to me because it assumes that God has to achieve cer...
If the Trinity is real, then the other “false gods” are called that because they are being worshipped in place of the real 3-in-1 God. It’s not becaus...
To more clearly address your argument, I will lay out your premises and conclusion according to my understanding of the argument. 1. Trial and error d...
It seems like your argument goes something like this: 1. If animals are innocent and feel pain, it is wrong to cause pain to them. 2. Animals are inno...
Premise 4 does seem like the most objectionable premise. I have something to add on to the objection you had mentioned though. It depends on what you ...
It seems to me like one of your main arguments has the following form: 1. If the property of omnipotence contradicts itself, then the property of omni...
Comments