You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Janus

Comments

Al those things you listed are the activities of the human organism. The organism regulates its activities, but it is not a "single entity" if by that...
March 16, 2023 at 22:48
At a certain moment you made a choice. Where did that choice come from? Did you choose to make that choice? Did you choose to choose to choose, or did...
March 16, 2023 at 22:19
I came back to give you one last chance to come up with something other than shit.
March 16, 2023 at 21:55
I haven't suggested it is profound. Grammar reflects our thinking, which is dualistic; and that is basic. But it is simplistic to suggest that it is m...
March 16, 2023 at 21:33
You're full of shit, Banno. Sometimes I think you are just a troll.
March 16, 2023 at 05:57
Brilliant rebuttal as usual! :roll:
March 16, 2023 at 05:37
I don't have a lot of time for academic philosophers; too much peer pressure at work. I doubt that many "sophisticated" philosophers (outside the 'ana...
March 16, 2023 at 03:42
It seems I missed this response of yours previously. I'm not sure about "innatism", but enactivism and Kant's a priori intuition (if you mean space an...
March 16, 2023 at 03:20
You may think that you have moved on (not sure who you think the "we" are), but many would disagree with you; some may say we have moved backwards rat...
March 16, 2023 at 01:17
Right, we have no reason to think that it is or is not how it appears, or even that it might be one or the other. Precisely Kant's point; and nothing ...
March 16, 2023 at 00:29
It's not just about you; we all have our presuppositions, preferences and prejudices. As I see it Kant doesn't offer the thing-in-itself as an explana...
March 15, 2023 at 23:57
Which is exactly the point of Kant's antinomies as I understand it; to indicate the aporias that inevitably attend upon dualistic thinking. Kant refer...
March 15, 2023 at 23:31
I'm not seeing the relevance to the question as to whether the cosmos is infinitely large or finite in extent. None of our imaginative speculations te...
March 15, 2023 at 22:59
"Limited" as I read it just means something like "of finite extent". That is probably what Kant meant. Can you propose an alternate usage?
March 15, 2023 at 02:46
I agree it is. like most philosophical discussion, of little use; it's just a way to pass the time.
March 15, 2023 at 00:16
I think we are misled mostly by reification; the "fallacies of misplaced concreteness". I think we are misled when we think that our dualistic abs tra...
March 14, 2023 at 23:29
Metaphysical ideas can be negated; Kant's antinomies are based on metaphysical speculations. It's not merely a grammatical matter; the grammar reflect...
March 14, 2023 at 21:15
Of course. Such would be the dogmatic ideas. Could not any of those be negated? Do you think it is possible that any idea exists which could not be ne...
March 14, 2023 at 06:13
I wasn't concerned whether progress is a "fact". I was merely pointing out that there is a distinction between the defeatist attitude that it is impos...
March 14, 2023 at 06:06
The "myth of progress" is that progress is inevitable. It's not the myth of progress which is methodically efficacious, but the attitude of openness t...
March 13, 2023 at 21:03
Yes, as per Hegel, every idea contains the seeds of its own negation, which is just what you would expect, given the dualistic nature of human thought...
March 13, 2023 at 20:48
That sounds about right to me. Even if we can't know that science gives a true representation of a mind-independent reality, we have nothing else remo...
March 08, 2023 at 23:37
Thanks, there's a lot there and I don't have much time today, so just one clarifying question: Do you take 'transcendental' to mean beyond experience,...
March 07, 2023 at 23:15
I'm not an adherent, so not what I had in mind. #1: "The world (reality) is the totality of facts..." what is a fact if not a collective representatio...
March 07, 2023 at 06:43
I'll try to "dig it out": If "the schema of reality is existence in a determined time" then that is referring to a reality for us; a collective repres...
March 07, 2023 at 00:49
If you want the most radical thesis on time check out The End of Time by Julian Barbour. I've been reading, and trying to understand, it, and it's doi...
March 06, 2023 at 22:53
Neutral monism seems to have something in common with Spinoza's metaphysics. For Spinoza extensa and cogitans were just two of the infinite attributes...
March 06, 2023 at 22:36
I am getting to this a tad tardily, but anyhow... It's an interesting question whether Kant's "in itself" denotes a reality. I think it must since it ...
March 06, 2023 at 22:18
I think what you say is clearly an absurd suggestion is precisely what Jung means. Without consciousness to disclose it, being would be "blind", hidde...
March 05, 2023 at 22:09
I'm only repeating what are uncontroversial facts in the history of ideas, so my saying so has little to do with it.
March 05, 2023 at 21:35
The Great Chain of Being and Jacob's Ladder are analogous (although the former is reputedly of Greek origin (Plato and Aristotle), while the latter is...
March 05, 2023 at 21:31
Liberating caged beings in order to eliminate their suffering is not the same as extinguishing sentience altogether which would be the ultimate elimin...
March 05, 2023 at 07:32
On searching I found that most sources equate the meaning of 'being' with 'existence'. To be is to exist. So, whatever the historical common or philos...
March 05, 2023 at 04:38
They are different words, obviously. But in common usage the basic concepts to be and to exist seem to be more or less synonymous. 'To exist' does see...
March 05, 2023 at 03:00
I am not familiar with the Black Notebooks or the "Rector's Address. If Heidegger did, and continued to, identify his project with antisemitism then I...
March 05, 2023 at 02:48
I think his Nazism was a mistake that he soon recognized and he may have been too proud to acknowledge that it was a mistake. That said, his philosoph...
March 05, 2023 at 02:07
Not so much an etymology as the origin of the concepts of being inside or outside. If the idea was first expressed in Proto-Indo-European that still w...
March 05, 2023 at 01:53
That seems overly esoteric and philosophically sophisticated to me. I think the notions of external and internal would have likely had a much more ped...
March 05, 2023 at 01:41
What does not look right?
March 05, 2023 at 01:33
The "analogy" was not meant to indicate that internal always refers to things as being inside bodies, but as being inside some "container" or other, h...
March 05, 2023 at 01:31
How odd that you should think I was saying that. Perhaps if you read more closely you would have noticed the " analogously used", which I have now und...
March 05, 2023 at 01:19
:ok: Fair enough, although that would not seem to be a likely view of the modern materialist.
March 05, 2023 at 01:17
Yes, astronomy may have begun as astrology, and chemistry as alchemy. But that would not seem to be surprising or anything to feel uncomfortable about...
March 05, 2023 at 01:06
Yes the liver is internal to the body. How else do you think the notions of internal and exteranl originated, and continue to be analogously used, if ...
March 05, 2023 at 01:03
He also differentiated notions of existence. Existentiell and existential are key terms in Martin Heidegger's early philosophy. Existentiell refers to...
March 05, 2023 at 01:01
It seems that the notion of external and internal derives form the idea of things being internal or external to the body. Our bodies are experienced a...
March 05, 2023 at 00:21
I'm no Kant scholar,180, but I've got a little time this morning, so I'll give it a go. As far as I know the idea that we have access only to appearan...
March 04, 2023 at 23:12
In accordance with general usage I see no reason to think that 'being' is not synonymous with 'existence' and 'beings' is not synonymous with 'existen...
March 04, 2023 at 03:06
I think you've laid out the distinction between DR and IR nicely. My only objection is to the terms "inside" and "outside". So, I would say DR posits ...
March 04, 2023 at 00:28
You added the reference to the Emily Dickinson poem after my initial response and your reference to it reminds me of a point I've made many times in c...
March 03, 2023 at 21:33