You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Janus

Comments

Spinoza already solved this Cartesian puzzle. There are not two substances, extensa and cogitans, but one substance seen under two attributes. This re...
October 10, 2023 at 21:32
Your response does not contradict what I said. States of affairs or actualities are specific, and so are statements about them. If the actualities wer...
October 10, 2023 at 21:03
I think this is a matter of logic; to be this or that no observer would seem to be required. To be distinguished as this or that an observer is requir...
October 10, 2023 at 20:58
I meant you are stipulating that the sense of the term "existence" should be restricted to "exists for us".
October 10, 2023 at 01:20
You are appealing to a narrow concept of existence here.
October 09, 2023 at 21:56
I see it more as reducing duality to non-duality; non-duality being neither one nor many. Duality is simply based on the notion of separation, a conce...
October 09, 2023 at 21:51
I don't think it is quite as clear as you seem to think it is. but I do agree that religion also fulfills other needs; it can provide a sense of commu...
October 08, 2023 at 22:57
There is a fourth possibility, and that is that there are many people who have psychological needs for salvation, but that there is no real possibilit...
October 08, 2023 at 22:39
If Trump lies, some may interpret it as him speaking truth. Nonetheless it seems plausible to think there is a fact of the matter as to whether he lie...
October 08, 2023 at 22:29
Free will in a deterministic world would not be free will as it is conceived in the libertarian sense. It would simply consist in a lack of constraint...
October 08, 2023 at 22:22
If we want to discuss Trump, then we must all see him as Trump, not as Hillary Clinton or Shirley Temple, no? We must all first agree about what he ha...
October 08, 2023 at 22:00
It seems obvious. When I'm working with another carpenter and I ask her to pass me the saw, she does not pass me the router. When I throw the ball for...
October 08, 2023 at 21:55
It's not clear to me what you are trying to get at, Baker.
October 08, 2023 at 21:51
If we all saw different things; if I saw a bus where you saw a tree, then no normativity would be possible. The fact that at the basic level of bare p...
October 08, 2023 at 21:39
What kind of question is that?
October 08, 2023 at 21:36
I've been talking about perception not politics.
October 08, 2023 at 21:33
I don't see it that way. Why do we, as societies, desire normativity? I'd say it is because we care about social harmony. We don't need to establish n...
October 08, 2023 at 21:32
I would have thought that reality as it is in itself cannot be known in principle, because reality as it is in itself is defined by its not being real...
October 08, 2023 at 21:22
I would not agree that Kant thinks our cognitions distort reality. I think he would agree that what we perceive is real; the way I see the tree, for e...
October 08, 2023 at 06:45
:up: All you say there makes good sense to me.
October 08, 2023 at 06:04
In: Belief  — view comment
:up:
October 08, 2023 at 05:54
I agree with that, assuming that you mean everything should be out in the open and that there should be no hidden or unacknowledged premises at work i...
October 08, 2023 at 04:33
In: Belief  — view comment
I think @"creativesoul" is either trading on, or confusing himself with, an ambiguity of expression: "S believes a broken clock is not broken". The be...
October 08, 2023 at 04:29
I don't think so. I guess the question is who is to be the judge when it comes to personal salvation...or enlightenment?
October 08, 2023 at 04:17
:up:
October 08, 2023 at 04:14
OK, fair enough...I guess I misunderstood where you were going with it.
October 08, 2023 at 04:12
Well, I do get into arguments about whether metaphysical arguments are truth-apt, and I think it is true that they are not, for the simple reason that...
October 08, 2023 at 03:27
Fair enough, I am stretching the conventional meaning of "sound" somewhat to apply to premises as well as arguments. I think it is fair to say that wh...
October 08, 2023 at 03:01
I understand "sound or unsound" to be equivalent to "true or untrue". Premises can be sound or unsound, true or untrue, but when it comes to metaphysi...
October 08, 2023 at 01:50
In: Belief  — view comment
As I undertsnd it a propositional attitude can be a belief even if not all propositional attitudes are beliefs. So, I searched and found this: Proposi...
October 08, 2023 at 01:42
Belief presupposes a belief in truth, not the possession of it. If the truth cannot be determined, it is a mere human presumption that says there must...
October 08, 2023 at 01:01
I just came across this thread, so apologies if I repeat what has already been said. I don't see philosophical arguments as being true or false, but r...
October 08, 2023 at 00:57
In: Belief  — view comment
Why can't it be said that S had a propositional attitude towards the clock; namely the belief that it was functioning. I must admit I'm struggling to ...
October 08, 2023 at 00:43
It is tangential, and I'm being pedantic in saying that it is not that they couldn't have imagined it, but that they didn't. Although, that said, if d...
October 07, 2023 at 23:43
Not "unimaginable", but unimagined; if they can say what happened to them, then it could not have been unimaginable.
October 07, 2023 at 23:34
Why do you say that? The idea of moral responsibility is inevitable for self-reflective social animals. To the degree that someone cannot be responsib...
October 07, 2023 at 22:57
'Religion" is not a strictly definitive term, but an "umbrella" term under which what are generally soteriological practices and / or beliefs can be u...
October 07, 2023 at 22:51
That's fair enough. I tend to think we have a political, social, cultural and historical as well as a basic physical and biological existence, and bey...
October 06, 2023 at 22:13
No, you can feel certain that you are a cat, but you cannot be certain that you are a cat if you are not. The point was to draw a distinction between ...
October 06, 2023 at 21:53
Your citing of Descartes had apparently led me to think you were addressing the ontological, not the political, question of your existence; a differen...
October 06, 2023 at 21:37
You've never been called a bellicose bumpkin?
October 06, 2023 at 07:36
It's only exhausting in principle. I think the point still stands, if my existence is dependent on my being able to assert it, then I don't exist at s...
October 06, 2023 at 07:34
Sounds like you are probably talking about almost all of the universe, at least with reference to human experience.
October 06, 2023 at 02:54
I'd say there are as many conceptions of "the world" as there are people. The basic idea "the world" is culturally learned, it is now a convention, an...
October 06, 2023 at 02:43
Yes, that makes sense to me.
October 06, 2023 at 02:39
:lol: Yeah, that's about how seriously I take this nonsense. Any term can only be defined in other terms, so how does any term help? :roll: You know a...
October 06, 2023 at 02:38
We follow a convention and accept a taken-for-granted everyday world. But that world is not created by anyone since it doesn't actually exist.
October 06, 2023 at 00:51
Forever means there is no limit in prinicple. What does "qu-orever" mean? Tell me that and I'll tell you whether I meant that. I don't even know what ...
October 06, 2023 at 00:49
That notion of self-knowledge is unproblematic—it is a matter of developing awareness of what is being felt, thought and done and how those feelings, ...
October 06, 2023 at 00:41
I think cultural differences are overblown and that Wittgenstein's comment about not being able to understand the lion is ridiculous. What language is...
October 06, 2023 at 00:32