You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Janus

Comments

It was a straightforward question that could be answered 'yes' or 'no' and you did not answer it. And I suspect I know very well why you didn't answer...
December 27, 2016 at 21:59
Should you not for example have written "recommending" rather than "achieving"? Because otherwise I am having difficulty parsing your statement.
December 27, 2016 at 21:19
Now you are countering a question with a question. Why don't you just give an honest answer to the question instead of bullshitting around?
December 27, 2016 at 20:59
Sure, atheists could use the belief in God to create the illusion of absolute authority.
December 27, 2016 at 20:57
I didn't say they did.
December 27, 2016 at 20:54
Social conservatives generally believe in authority as being necessary for creating social cohesion. God is associated with the idea of genuine author...
December 27, 2016 at 20:48
Thats not an answer to the question.
December 27, 2016 at 20:42
Would there be any actuality; that is, would anything at all be the case in a world that contained no percipients?
December 27, 2016 at 20:23
Well, it seems clear that is your opinion, for whatever it's worth. I don't have an opinion on that and I was merely referring to the way 'random' is ...
December 27, 2016 at 01:01
Ah, language! So many levels! General: universal, genera Specific: particular, species
December 26, 2016 at 23:36
I was using it in the ordinary sense as it is used in that Wikipedia article. If you are doubtful about what sense a term is being used in you can alw...
December 26, 2016 at 23:17
Alright, but from the beginning of this discussion I have consistently interpreted the question in the OP to be about the limits of science as theory,...
December 26, 2016 at 23:10
Again you're not disagreeing with what I said because I didn't claim that all the interactions of all the individual particles could be modeled. Obvio...
December 26, 2016 at 22:58
This is irrelevant because I never said it was. It is obviously modeled as the energetic interactions of all the particles, including the interactions...
December 26, 2016 at 22:39
All that's fine, as far as it goes. But in science these days the dominant paradigm says that ultimately biology and geology, for example, are reducib...
December 26, 2016 at 22:36
But, as far as I know, (and I don't know that much about quantum physics) the "particles" themselves are today considered to be energetic configuratio...
December 26, 2016 at 22:13
It all depends on what you mean by 'random' I suppose. From Wikipedia: Radioactive decay is a stochastic (i.e. random) process at the level of single ...
December 26, 2016 at 21:55
I don't disagree with anything much of what you say, except I am not much of a family guy.
December 26, 2016 at 21:44
Never denied it. You lean that way yourself it seems, and somewhat more authoritarian too, which is no surprise. :P
December 26, 2016 at 21:33
/uploads/files/cx/8d2gcben17tioncm.png
December 26, 2016 at 21:27
At bottom there does not seem to be any coherent and unequivocal distinction between form and matter. But, again, this question has really nothing to ...
December 26, 2016 at 20:27
Atomic structure is probably better thought of as a material cause because it is understood to determine the different kinds of material or elements. ...
December 26, 2016 at 20:10
No it just means that modern people sometimes use the Aristotelian term (or more accurately the modern English translation of the Aristotelian term) w...
December 26, 2016 at 19:54
I took you to be referring to biological evolution.
December 26, 2016 at 19:33
You have diverted this into a side issue about Aristotle's understanding of causation. I never claimed that modern science's understanding of causatio...
December 26, 2016 at 19:31
Address what I have actually said if you want a response.
December 26, 2016 at 11:11
Sorry about delayed reply; this one slipped through the cracks somehow. The logical problem I see with thinking that Obama signifies a whole process f...
December 26, 2016 at 07:02
I haven't anywhere said that calculus is used to model all kinds of change. Evolution is understood in terms of the interactions between the structura...
December 26, 2016 at 06:27
I haven't suggested that the natural sciences operate in an Aristotelian paradigm; so, there is no need to state the obvious. Modern science is atomis...
December 26, 2016 at 06:15
The natural sciences and engineering are mostly modeled in terms of mechanistic (or in Aristotelian terms, efficient causation). There are some moves ...
December 25, 2016 at 23:18
It's modeled in mathematical (statistical) terms, no?
December 25, 2016 at 22:46
If you can precisely model it in terms of mathematics or mechanistic causal process then you have something that is a matter for science. Anything tha...
December 25, 2016 at 22:08
:)
December 25, 2016 at 00:17
I hope not; is it an evil emoticon? Oh, perhaps I see, the eyes are not merely open, but diabolically open on that one? O:) Remember now, my tendency ...
December 24, 2016 at 23:20
Merry Christmas Agustino X-)
December 24, 2016 at 23:00
That's ridiculous, because neither you, nor anyone else knows the truth, in this regard. Merry Christmas to all.
December 24, 2016 at 21:59
"Dust particles in the right atmospheric conditions resulting in snowflakes" with their variations on an invariant pattern just is an expression of un...
December 23, 2016 at 02:26
I don't think Kant's philosophy really addresses Hume's point about the irrationality of expecting things to be as they have been. I think it addresse...
December 22, 2016 at 22:33
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use." Kierkegaard
December 22, 2016 at 22:25
Yes, I think this is an extremely important point, and not often understood. I understand that "belief" to consist in a certain kind of lived relation...
December 22, 2016 at 21:48
I think that is very much a matter of how you define knowledge and belief. For Hume, for example, it is merely a belief based on habit that leads us t...
December 22, 2016 at 21:39
I very much admire the ability to admit mistakes; it shows real integrity. :)
December 22, 2016 at 09:54
For fuck's sake man; how many times do I have to explain that I never claimed that religious beliefs are infallible?
December 22, 2016 at 09:11
I agree that motivation to action is the most important function of any belief. I see nothing wrong with having "strong beliefs", however, as long as ...
December 22, 2016 at 09:10
I have never said the beliefs are infallible. There are two many misunderstandings and misrepresentations of what I have said for me to bother correct...
December 22, 2016 at 09:01
Yes, but the fact is that beliefs, which are of kinds neither demonstrable nor falsifiable, are almost universally associated with any spiritual or re...
December 22, 2016 at 08:26
But I haven't anywhere said that beliefs that don't count as fallible insofar as they cannot be in principle disproven are thereby infallible. I alrea...
December 22, 2016 at 08:23
It's not I that have changed the subject. The discussion was about whether beliefs that are not fallible or truth-apt such as a belief in God, or chi ...
December 22, 2016 at 07:55
Yes I know this is true from personal experience. There are plenty of such examples. A Christian devotes his life to charitable works, for example, an...
December 22, 2016 at 05:49
It may be more a consequence of how you practice, which in turn may be influenced by a belief if that belief inspires to practice, and to a particular...
December 22, 2016 at 05:41