You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Janus

Comments

Fair enough. There is certainly not enough time to study everything.
October 13, 2017 at 03:50
Is that why you like it?
October 13, 2017 at 03:49
Yeah, well Michel Henry is not Merleau Ponty, he was a Christian and wrote this book: https://www.amazon.com/Am-Truth-Philosophy-Christianity-Cultural...
October 13, 2017 at 03:47
Apparently you have no aversion to false modesty, though.
October 13, 2017 at 03:13
What is "out there" is what has already been determined as some kind of intentional object, I would say. The Henry book I referred to earlier is inter...
October 13, 2017 at 03:10
For sure some phenomena are only associated with living beings; digestion or homeostasis, for example.
October 13, 2017 at 02:35
I would say the square root of two exists,but is not precisely determinable. I haven't said that numbers exist in the same way that concrete particula...
October 13, 2017 at 02:34
Yes, I do seem to remember that distinction between "exist" and "subsist" in Russell. I would still want to say that universals exist, though; for exa...
October 13, 2017 at 02:29
Numbers "stand apart" from other numbers, and from all other things as well.
October 13, 2017 at 02:23
Emotions and sensations are phenomena; and yet they cannot be filmed; so, this seems like a ill-though out criterion.
October 13, 2017 at 02:21
This is simply wrong. Information and representation cannot be "separated", but they can be distinguished between, which is not the same thing at all.
October 13, 2017 at 02:07
They do exist as phenomena, They don't exist as objects of the senses. They don't exist independently of objects of the senses, either, though. If you...
October 13, 2017 at 02:06
I am not saying it is; I have asked you what the abstraction is apart from the communication and understanding of it, though. What are you suggesting ...
October 13, 2017 at 01:58
Abstractions can only be expressed as "concrete particulars of physicality"; what can they be apart from that? Even when you think an abstraction, the...
October 13, 2017 at 00:38
You're simply assuming that abstractions are something in themselves apart from our communications and understandings of them. It is precisely herein ...
October 12, 2017 at 23:39
How can an abstraction be communicated or understood except in physical terms? If you think it could then perhaps you could offer an example.
October 12, 2017 at 23:34
Certainly number, laws. conventions, logic and the like don't exist as objects of the senses. However they certainly exist as phenomena, and we cannot...
October 12, 2017 at 23:32
Imagined abstractions are always abstracted from, and imagined in forms derived from, the physical world; the experience of the physical world is the ...
October 12, 2017 at 23:26
The symbol '7' only exists in different physical forms as representations. What it represents is the idea of a quantity; an idea which can only really...
October 12, 2017 at 23:11
Then I don't understand what basis you think there is for thinking of them as "non-physical". You don't seem to have provided any argument for that. A...
October 12, 2017 at 22:39
An algebraic cannot be given or understood except in terms of physical marks and symbols; so I'm not sure what you are getting at here. I mean, how co...
October 12, 2017 at 22:32
From a phenomenological perspective we are "informed" twice by impressions. First there is the primordial 'whatever it is" that impresses us,affects u...
October 12, 2017 at 22:12
That makes sense to me.
October 09, 2017 at 21:45
Could the creation of violent music be an act of love (in any sense) as opposed to the music itself being an embodiment of love?
October 09, 2017 at 19:17
If God is Love, then an act of God is an act of Love, no?
October 09, 2017 at 19:14
Surely your familiar with the idea of God as Love? When you create a piece of music; is that an act of love?
October 09, 2017 at 09:02
Creation as an act of love.
October 09, 2017 at 08:53
I should have said that if the world is created out of nothing then there simply is no problem of evil, rather than saying it would then be a "pseudo-...
October 07, 2017 at 09:11
Well it could be, as according to science, created out of nothing. And I agree that the problem of evil would in that case be a pseudo-problem. So. it...
October 07, 2017 at 07:07
Yes, I agree. We have an intuitive feel for them, but no comprehensive discursive understanding. The Christian idea of the "Cloud of Unknowing"; the u...
October 07, 2017 at 06:57
We think of the absolute as being that which is 'in itself' or beyond our experience and understanding. So absolute goodness would be pure goodness in...
October 07, 2017 at 06:45
If we are going to be consistent in our projection of an absolute then we are projecting it as that which is beyond our understanding. It would seem a...
October 07, 2017 at 05:03
Do we have a perfect understanding of good and evil, such that we are justified in saying that the existence of evil is incompatible with perfect good...
October 07, 2017 at 02:04
I'm enjoying this conversation too, Mike. To answer your question, I would say that time as succession (presuming that is what you mean by "linear tim...
October 06, 2017 at 05:22
The past is determined insofar as we tell our stories that determine it to be like this, and not that. I don't believe there is any timeline apart for...
October 06, 2017 at 03:51
Even if we accept for the sake of argument that the path "took a very specific route" how does it follow from that that it must have been determined i...
October 06, 2017 at 03:40
Of course, according to our understanding a single path was traversed, but does that have any meaning beyond the context of our understanding? In a wa...
October 06, 2017 at 03:27
How do we know that though?
October 06, 2017 at 03:24
So we do assume.
October 06, 2017 at 03:22
I am well familiar with all the kinds of arguments you cited from other threads. the problem is, none of them are compelling to anyone who doesn't emp...
October 06, 2017 at 03:05
I wouldn't say that. I'd say "a person watching from the future" constructs a story of events that he posits as the path.
October 06, 2017 at 02:56
Have you hear of the "three body problem"? The point is that complex processes are not predictable in any but a probabilistic way. Think of the weathe...
October 06, 2017 at 02:52
You seem to be considering determinability and predictability to be coterminous? Or, another question: are determination and predetermination the same...
October 06, 2017 at 01:19
OK. but the salient point is that semiotics cannot take you beyond naturalism. Just as you can nonetheless think beyond naturalism despite being a sem...
October 06, 2017 at 00:11
Kant deliberately distinguished 'transcendent' from 'transcendental'. He rejected the coherence of the idea of the transcendent. The transcendental he...
October 05, 2017 at 22:46
Any example could only be refuted by a counter-example. Can you give an example of a statement by any semiotician that shows that the notion of transc...
October 05, 2017 at 21:35
Yes, indeed, the deliverances of the human imagination must be eliminated at all costs, or we may, woe betide us, be duped into some illusory understa...
October 04, 2017 at 23:24
Yes, I think a distinction can be made between communication and understanding. There is probably much that we, along with other animals, understand v...
October 04, 2017 at 23:09
Sure, but like all "aesthetic pictures" it is subjective, and there are no resources within it with which to form an argument that could be compelling...
October 04, 2017 at 23:01
For semiotics, there is no meaning 'beyond' the signs; no meaning 'out there' or 'in here' in some transcendent sense. So, it is reductionist, just as...
October 04, 2017 at 22:47