You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Janus

Comments

Do you really consider that to be a "profound point"? I don't: I would say that surely Einstein would not have been stupid enough to miss something so...
February 15, 2018 at 22:05
I'm not really much familiar with externalism, beyond a passing acquaintance with Putnam's 'twin-Earth' argument which featured in an undergrad course...
February 15, 2018 at 21:58
Your statistical assessment is just a guess, and even if it were accurate, you would still have no warrant for classing me with the 'most of' rather t...
February 15, 2018 at 21:44
What puzzles me is why Nagel thinks anyone would be afraid of something if they had no motivation to concern themselves with it. If I do have a motiva...
February 15, 2018 at 03:09
My criticism has been that your account, or something like it, could be more adequate, more comprehensive, if it allowed for more distinctions, as I h...
February 15, 2018 at 02:20
Nah, you're not serious about being unprejudiced, and making a genuine effort to explain and critique your own positions, so it just aint worth the ef...
February 15, 2018 at 02:04
Yes, I agree with this. The point of all rational inquiry is really critique it seems. I mean the rational part is to keep check on the intuitive part...
February 14, 2018 at 23:07
Interestingly the BO portrait is more lifelike, in the sense of being a better resemblance, than the MO. Note the 'semblance' in resemblance, though; ...
February 14, 2018 at 22:44
Demanding does not necessarily include expecting, and not being satisfied does not necessarily include frustration. :)
February 14, 2018 at 22:32
You know what they say about assumptions? Did I say I that I expected anything or that I was frustrated?
February 14, 2018 at 22:09
Everything.
February 14, 2018 at 22:04
Because I demand quality.
February 14, 2018 at 22:02
No. ;)
February 14, 2018 at 21:59
For my taste the portrait of MO is terrible, lifeless, wooden. In terms of composition it is irredeemable. The portrait of JK is much more 'living' bu...
February 14, 2018 at 21:56
Is business the only conceivable form of busy-ness? :s
February 14, 2018 at 21:43
The interesting point for me here is whether grammar, or calculus, are themselves deductively or intuitively derived. I think they as much the result ...
February 13, 2018 at 23:27
What about phenomenology or process philosophy? Have they nothing at all to offer to increase our overall understanding of human life and the world in...
February 13, 2018 at 23:05
I've never been decided about that question; it can depend on what you mean by "tell something about the world". It does seem as though mathematics mu...
February 13, 2018 at 23:00
So, "there are black swans" is true iff "it is true that there are black swans" is true?
February 13, 2018 at 22:43
I think apo could say that his metaphysics is true is he were to assert that his metaphysics fairly represents what the community of enquirers will ul...
February 13, 2018 at 22:40
I would rather say that there is a rational discourse that might reasonably be called induction, a rational discourse that is valid because it can alw...
February 13, 2018 at 22:36
On the other hand why not simply: "there are black swans" and "this sentence is in English"?
February 13, 2018 at 22:24
Exactly, that is just the point I have been trying to drive home! Your second point is irrelevant, though, because the dubiousness of premises is irre...
February 13, 2018 at 22:21
Really? :-} The first premise is deductively redundant, but there would not be any motivation to make the assumption that forms the second premise if ...
February 13, 2018 at 22:16
Yes and the point is that insofar as the conclusions are contained in the premises of all valid deductive arguments they are all, in a certain sense, ...
February 13, 2018 at 19:35
WTH??? It's all sighs and irrelevancies with you! I wonder what rich trove of hard won/obsessively cobbled together insights/realisations you are desp...
February 13, 2018 at 19:31
No it would be the same inference with the premises made explicit. And the point is simply that inductive arguments can be rendered in deductive form ...
February 13, 2018 at 08:46
All good points!
February 13, 2018 at 06:45
I'm not sure where you are going with this Banno; could you elaborate?
February 13, 2018 at 06:44
Go read the recent posts. It always ends like this with you. :-}
February 13, 2018 at 06:41
I was criticizing your argument by pointing out more and subtler distinctions you could make if your terms were more rigorously used, not being pedant...
February 13, 2018 at 06:19
So, you reject the dictionary definition, then? Not so bright! Turn up the wattage; you'll gain clarity... :-}
February 13, 2018 at 04:46
From Google search, here: https://www.google.com.au/search?q=term+definition&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b&gfe_rd=cr&dcr=0&ei=amyCWq6XL83N8gealry...
February 13, 2018 at 04:43
So, say two lines met a billion parsecs away. In that case do they start out truly parallel? If they do, then at what point do they cease to be parall...
February 13, 2018 at 04:40
More adequate terms are more precise in that they enable more distinctions and acknowledge more subtle distinctions.
February 13, 2018 at 04:25
That's right, it's a goad to motivate you to pay attention to suggested refinements.
February 13, 2018 at 04:24
It's not "petty bullshit" but suggested refinements, for the sake of greater clarity, of your inadequate terms.
February 13, 2018 at 04:21
No, the term "thought" refers to the process of thinking; it is the noun equiavelnt to the verb "thinking, in other words. The term "a thought" refers...
February 13, 2018 at 04:20
No, your problem is that you're not interested in anyone else's thoughts and beliefs, even when they are patently more coherent than your own.
February 13, 2018 at 04:16
Note I said "thoughts" and "beliefs" and you responded using "thought" and "belief". I have been referring to thought as 'thinking' and belief as "bel...
February 13, 2018 at 04:01
LOL, I'm not really sure what you're wanting to say here. That's twice in a row now, so maybe the problem lies with me. Here's an abductive/ inductive...
February 12, 2018 at 23:34
This is a very good point. Deduction being a derivative puristic formalization of inductive reasoning can hardly arrogate to itself such a priority. W...
February 12, 2018 at 23:31
That's an intriguing, yet puzzling, statement: could you flesh it out a bit?
February 12, 2018 at 23:22
That could be a way; but I was thinking of conjecture just as the 'creative imagination' part of science which then gets worked into hypotheses that m...
February 12, 2018 at 23:12
But this is not what Kant held. He held that our intuition of space and time represented the world as it is experienced by us. The Euclidean conceptio...
February 12, 2018 at 22:54
Firstly that is exactly what I was proposing to do "make a case for the viability of inductive inference in general". Determinism can be framed deduct...
February 12, 2018 at 22:33
Yes, I acknowledge the differences between a deterministic and a probabilistic explanation for the laws of nature; my point was only that we have no a...
February 12, 2018 at 22:23
I still don't have a lot of time, so since you think this might be the salient point of our disagreement, we probably should focus on defining our ter...
February 12, 2018 at 22:17
We don't observe light rays or curvature of space in the way we see cells through a microscope, though. We observe other phenomena about which light r...
February 12, 2018 at 22:02
No, I just mean that there is no viable alternative method. Not really. We have to make assumptions to get started. As I have shown if you make the as...
February 12, 2018 at 21:32