You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Janus

Comments

Ah, inaction!
October 04, 2020 at 00:54
:up:
October 04, 2020 at 00:46
As I said I'm not seeking to explain "rules by more rules" or even "games by more games". Where, if at all, does explanation terminate? What's your al...
October 03, 2020 at 23:47
How is imitation just more rules? Are you claiming that is so in animals too? If you call following instinct following a rule, then your usage of "rul...
October 03, 2020 at 23:18
Say someone uses a novel expression; it could become established as convention or not. If others don't imitate, then it won't become established, and ...
October 03, 2020 at 23:00
As I already suggested, I think we understand malapropisms through association. Association is basically a form of imitation; where one idea resembles...
October 03, 2020 at 22:53
Well, the explanation for our ability to understand malapropisms that Davidson seems to be rejecting is that it could be merely a matter of following ...
October 03, 2020 at 22:28
The "just doing it" is not in question, obviously; it's the explanation for that ability which is in question.
October 03, 2020 at 22:15
Strangely my first thought was "soup kitchen". It's all a matter of associations I guess. "Tureen" associates the idea of two kinds of vessel or conta...
October 03, 2020 at 21:59
I'd say this kind of what you call rule following is simply imitation. Humans (and other animals) seem to have a powerful instinct to imitate others o...
October 03, 2020 at 21:34
Thanks, will take a look at it.
October 03, 2020 at 01:52
Yes, well of course I am going to agree that the regress is gotten around; it must be. I also agree that rules (or at least conventions which can be e...
October 03, 2020 at 00:40
I agree that language does not rely on rules, and there is a fairly simple argument for that. If it was, through and through, merely a matter of follo...
October 02, 2020 at 23:47
Human life is negentropic, because it is not a closed system. Sure it can descend into disorder, but that would be the result of mismanagement, human ...
October 02, 2020 at 23:19
Really? What do you think it means?
October 02, 2020 at 02:59
I don't think so. Not in any simplistic sense. It's a more complex question than it appears to be.
October 01, 2020 at 11:04
I actually don't think Buddhism sees the world as "dark and evil" but it ascribes the darkness and evil that brings suffering to dukha (ignorance) whi...
October 01, 2020 at 03:19
I would say that will is a reified concept of motivation or causation. It may be reasonable to ascribe will to self-conscious agents but Schopenhauer ...
October 01, 2020 at 02:55
Surely that would vary with each individual. Not having experienced what others do, and having only anecdotal evidence of a vanishingly tiny fraction ...
October 01, 2020 at 01:57
Why should the fact of entropy lead us to pessimism? The Buddha is considered to be all-good and all-knowing if not all-powerful. There are many deiti...
October 01, 2020 at 00:27
If you define religion as consisting in worship of a deity, then Buddhism both does and does not (and neither does nor does not :wink:) qualify as a r...
October 01, 2020 at 00:04
Returning to the point raised in the post before last. Having said what is said there, I acknowledge that it must be thought to be a bad thing if soci...
September 30, 2020 at 23:12
I am not sure just what an "identity claim" is for you. Is it a claim that there exists a changeless soul? Or is it a more empirical claim that there ...
September 30, 2020 at 22:36
The whole point of this thread has been to show that it is not coherent to claim that AP (or any other branch of philosophy or intellectual pursuit) h...
September 30, 2020 at 01:12
Of course we value on account of how we have been socially conditioned, and how we have reacted to that and worked with it, or not. Community values, ...
September 30, 2020 at 00:18
Yes, so each individual decides what has value for their life and its limits.
September 30, 2020 at 00:08
They are simply different approaches to different subjects. There is no absolute measure of value by which they could be compared.
September 29, 2020 at 23:59
The increase in early and late teen mental illness, depression and suicide is disturbing. On a general level, if social media and the news filter bubb...
September 29, 2020 at 07:06
A love triangle has three sides, hence the name.
September 28, 2020 at 23:19
I take "AP" to refer to philosophy which is predominately concerned with logic, language and semantics. I think "logical rigour', however that has bee...
September 28, 2020 at 03:15
I don't know what you mean by "knowing it to be thought". Philosophy doesn't "tell me anything" it is ideology that would "tell me things". There is n...
September 28, 2020 at 02:46
Sure, but Popper is both a philosopher of science and a political philosopher, and would not usually be considered an analytic philosopher since his m...
September 28, 2020 at 02:38
If you're referring to practical, political or ecological relevance, then so what? No philosophy really has direct practical relevance, and only polit...
September 28, 2020 at 00:39
Relevance to what? Do you think they should reciprocate and not deny you the aesthetic right to play your dialectical games (or however you style them...
September 27, 2020 at 23:31
Well, we'll have to wait for Jersey to return and state whether he is only concerned with the "negative social value" of this particular paper of Davi...
September 26, 2020 at 05:16
:ok:
September 26, 2020 at 03:31
Do you mean a judgement about the post you are making or the post you are responding to? If the latter, would it not be the case that if you didn't fi...
September 26, 2020 at 02:37
I know how you feel. But people have different styles, and some simply won't respond if they don't find what you have said interesting or relevant eno...
September 26, 2020 at 00:16
Consider yourself lucky then?
September 26, 2020 at 00:09
Now, that's an interesting question! Are the analytics analyitcally retentive or analytically expressive? (I have known quiet a few anal expressives).
September 25, 2020 at 23:48
Oh dear, if it's not about anything at all does that mean its worthless, or even has negative social value? Do you have an argument for that? :wink:
September 25, 2020 at 23:46
I think Jersey does want to claim worthlessness for the whole tradition, and even negative social value. Surely he couldn't be concerned about the neg...
September 25, 2020 at 23:44
Why are you worried about the behavior of individuals? Aren't you here to do some philosophy, to learn? The people you refer to can likely teach you s...
September 25, 2020 at 23:39
:up: yes, and the kind of iconoclastic analysis you are referring to is not confined to the anal tradition either! The intercontinentals also did thei...
September 25, 2020 at 23:35
That's hailarious! I haven't claimed anything about the value of analytic philosophy other than that it, like other intellectual pursuits, can sharpen...
September 25, 2020 at 23:18
No, you were making unwarranted assumptions about what I have been "conditioned" by. I'm not interested in references to works unless you want to quot...
September 25, 2020 at 06:58
:up:
September 25, 2020 at 06:49
I have no idea what you are talking about, all I've done is moved the discussion I was already having to this new thread since it was derailing the ot...
September 25, 2020 at 06:48
I still haven't seen your argument. Here we have instead a classic appeal to authority, and an implied ad hominem to top it off. Nice work! I actually...
September 25, 2020 at 02:04
I've started a new thread and copied this debate there, so as to refrain from derailing the thread further.
September 25, 2020 at 01:35