You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Janus

Comments

My posts on this reflect my observations; my experience of people, logic and the sciences. I'm very open to counterarguments, but none have been forth...
October 28, 2020 at 07:35
I think some religious people can see their religion's doctrines as metaphorical, not as literal. Whether such people should be referred to as believe...
October 28, 2020 at 07:27
It's not so much a reasonable conclusion than it is a fact. If religion could tell us anything definite, which could be rationally or empirically demo...
October 27, 2020 at 23:15
Its' easy to show how determinate inter-subjective knowledge is possible within logic, mathematics and the sciences. If you think it is possible in ot...
October 27, 2020 at 22:35
Yes, air is invisible too, but air pressure and the curvature of space have measurable effects. It's not a matter of me believing anything. I am merel...
October 27, 2020 at 22:21
That's just condescending nonsense to say that if someone doesn't find what you say convincing then they must not understand what you have said. Of co...
October 27, 2020 at 09:50
I'd say it is more the case that your mind is made up than it is that mine is. I actually used to think as you do, but I saw there were holes in it. I...
October 27, 2020 at 09:38
I say you are intellectually dishonest because you won't address any of the arguments made against your position, not on account of your holding your ...
October 27, 2020 at 06:18
Why would you say that? It is the theist who is claiming that something invisible exists. How could there ever be evidence for such an existence?
October 27, 2020 at 06:07
I agree with this; I value peak experiences for themselves, not as means to some imagined end. I don't believe any conclusions can be rationally deriv...
October 27, 2020 at 06:06
Why would you say that? Others can see you sitting at the table and thus confirm your belief in your experience of sitting at the table.
October 27, 2020 at 01:10
If it is an absolute eternal fact that there are no absolute facts, then all that shows is that there is one and one only absolute fact not that "ther...
October 26, 2020 at 23:05
If you think it could me more, then you should be able to explain how it could be. Note, I'm not claiming that peak experiences don't tell us anything...
October 26, 2020 at 22:48
Gnosticism is the belief that certain kinds of experiences tell us something about the nature of reality. That cannot ever be anything more than a bel...
October 26, 2020 at 22:15
Belief (faith) is fundamental, though, as Açvaghosha's Discourse on the Awakening of Faith in the Mahâyâna attests. Who would go through "unrelenting ...
October 26, 2020 at 03:46
Sure English can be systematized, but it doesn't seem to follow that language use is systematic not to mention algorithmic. Not all systems are algori...
October 13, 2020 at 23:03
As I see it wisdom consists in making good use of knowledge. What good use consists in is an ethical matter, a matter for each individual according to...
October 13, 2020 at 10:06
Can you offer an example of "language processing"? Understanding language seems to be more ad hoc and associative than algorithmic. Sure language has ...
October 13, 2020 at 09:34
Says "especially", not 'exclusively'. "Algorithm" is a malapropism :wink: as has already been suggested
October 13, 2020 at 00:25
Similarity of sound and shape are not the only associations; there are many other associations of ideas; that's why I thought the analogy unhelpful, b...
October 11, 2020 at 23:00
Yes, civil war is not an all or nothing thing; obviously there are degrees. Perhaps civil terrorism would have been a better term. I do think the pres...
October 10, 2020 at 21:09
The approach of another civil war in the disunited state of America?
October 09, 2020 at 21:49
According to Harry a malapropism must sound like or rhyme with the word it has replaced. Can you think of any candidates?
October 08, 2020 at 20:53
I appreciate your enthusiasm. I will admit I've only read through the paper once and skimming at that. I find Davidson very difficult to read. Usually...
October 08, 2020 at 20:08
You should read more carefully. I've already said several times that the meaning of sentences containing malapropisms or inappropriate words is derive...
October 08, 2020 at 19:56
Fair enough, but in that case the inappropriate usage of 'theory' is not for any actual purpose, and is potentially misleading for the novice. So, it ...
October 08, 2020 at 05:05
Firstly I would question just whose standard description this could be, and whether there really is a "standard description" at all. I'm not saying th...
October 08, 2020 at 04:39
I think you only have to look at some of the long threads to realize that length does not necessarily equate to quality. As to whether duration equate...
October 07, 2020 at 22:46
While I agree that that is the usual meaning of the term, the substituted words need not rhyme or sound similar. The etymology of malapropism renders ...
October 07, 2020 at 22:24
I've already read the paper. What do YOU think he's doing with it?
October 07, 2020 at 08:06
It's puzzling that you would say that malapropisms are not important to Davidson's argument. As I read it they are the central concern. But I find Dav...
October 07, 2020 at 03:33
I don't think the problem is so much the limitations of general accounts, but the impossibility of a precise account that doesn't rely on the idea of ...
October 07, 2020 at 03:28
If Davidson is claiming that people generally have "complex theories" about the rules of language use, which he says in the passage you quoted that I ...
October 07, 2020 at 03:20
Yes, and I think his use of "theory" in that context is therefore inapt. Would it count as a malapropism?
October 07, 2020 at 01:31
I did spray "nutting munch" not "nutting". Your dissemblance is knotted howover.
October 07, 2020 at 01:23
Sorry not sure what you mean; lacking in what capacity?
October 07, 2020 at 00:55
Most speakers and hearers probably don't entertain any "complex theories" at all. A complex theory may be able to be formulated after the fact based o...
October 07, 2020 at 00:54
Yes, and I'm not sure I would agree that the three principles do "cover" all "conventional accounts". It is a huge generalization that depends on what...
October 07, 2020 at 00:48
OK, and I agree; but isn't that the very thing that Davidson is also proposing. Isn't that, in other words, just the initial recognition of the proble...
October 07, 2020 at 00:39
My interest was rekindled so I edited the post. :smile: I did read that long paragraph at the bottom of page nine, and I'm not saying I don't agree wi...
October 07, 2020 at 00:38
This is a good point. We don't have any precise understanding of the meaning of Jabberwocky, and there are many poems included in the "Canon" that may...
October 07, 2020 at 00:32
I don't think your mixture of metaphors here is helping. Well, I guess I should only speak for myself: it's not helping me.
October 07, 2020 at 00:20
Now here's something more interesting! I have been thinking that no move in chess which involves the pieces moving in the conventional ways would be a...
October 07, 2020 at 00:15
You seem to be saying that language is not governed entirely by rules or conventions because otherwise it would be impossible to understand malapropis...
October 07, 2020 at 00:03
:gasp: That's true, but there is nothing in chess analogous to malapropistic expressions. I think my response to the earlier "soup tureen" example sho...
October 06, 2020 at 01:16
This thread seems to be going around in circles without anyone apparently being able to say with any surety just what Davidson is arguing for and just...
October 06, 2020 at 00:45
Yes, not a desirable result.
October 05, 2020 at 22:55
Can you think of any examples of total revolution; where existing institutions are not merely co-opted and rearranged, but completely done away with b...
October 05, 2020 at 22:24
Yes, but I dare say most radicals would not be content with what would likely come to pass if they had their way.
October 05, 2020 at 01:32
If radical change means sweeping away or even undermining existing institutions then it seems obvious that would be far more unlikely to lead to desir...
October 04, 2020 at 22:31