You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Srap Tasmaner

Comments

There's actually a funny issue with non-response I've been thinking about, since 's entreaty that I stick around. It's one of the things Lewis talks a...
June 11, 2025 at 21:09
Does this sentence strike anyone but frank as plausible? Sometimes @"frank" I just don't see the point in responding. I'm sure you understand.
June 11, 2025 at 20:10
I'll add one little note, relevant to the issues raised in the OP about essential properties. In the collected papers of Ruth Barcan Marcus, there is ...
June 11, 2025 at 17:46
Right right. It's been years since I read this. I've got nothing to contribute on "what Kripke would say" so I'll mosey along.
June 11, 2025 at 16:04
It just seems obviously not to be. 1. It has an indexical in it. I think that rules it out from the jump. 2. As phrased, it names a class of actual pe...
June 11, 2025 at 15:22
In this case, even to the degree that I am engaging with another person, I am speechless.
June 11, 2025 at 14:36
I'm sure it's my fault. Of course it should be possible to provide an account of what makes names names, what makes them special, what their role in l...
June 11, 2025 at 01:00
This question is a non-starter. You're presuming the entire system of conceptualization and language usage is at your disposal, and then all you're do...
June 10, 2025 at 22:54
Well, I'm not even sure what we're talking about now, but it looks like you are trying to create one of Wittgenstein's private languages. You want to ...
June 10, 2025 at 17:04
June 10, 2025 at 03:05
I'm a little unconvinced by the "about whom I say..." locution, precisely because we're lacking a guarantee that the sentence the speaker utters means...
June 10, 2025 at 02:07
Tell us what you mean by that, and why you think so.
June 09, 2025 at 23:09
Unless it is. This is such a great example because the reference of the word "champagne" is regularly disputed. Are you using the word "champagne" "co...
June 09, 2025 at 23:07
I don't think it's that simple. In cases where the speaker is mistaken, memory being what it is, it is possible for them to learn what they are trying...
June 09, 2025 at 22:12
I would only add that "the one holding a glass of champagne" is said for the audience's benefit. I can look at someone and silently think "asshole" an...
June 09, 2025 at 16:39
Which is fine, I've just been avoiding committing to some major difference between the natural sciences and the human or social sciences, because I've...
June 06, 2025 at 18:42
Agreed. I suppose I shouldn't have put it this way because I was thinking of the musicologist not the musician, someone who is analysing a performance...
June 06, 2025 at 17:18
Yeah I think there's a trick to that story, that it does mean it's too hard to sight-read. But then I also think about the difficulty of notating jazz...
June 06, 2025 at 15:06
I'd say people quite often want to learn things that can be known, and when they reflect on how they're going about doing that, you have the beginning...
June 06, 2025 at 14:40
June 06, 2025 at 02:02
I meant to say earlier, I quite like this idea.
June 06, 2025 at 01:59
To the hoi polloi, "science" seems mostly to mean "medicine", which is no doubt an interesting story. For my purposes, medicine is a good example beca...
June 06, 2025 at 00:40
I tend to think what matters most is that the enterprise is self-correcting, and it achieves that by being plural. The replication crisis is a great e...
June 05, 2025 at 14:37
That's a lovely point.
June 05, 2025 at 02:46
What if we left out "paradigmatically" in your question: are some disciplines "more scientific" than others? If you take "discipline" reasonably broad...
June 05, 2025 at 02:16
I don't really understand the question. "Appropriate" in what sense? I don't understand this question either. "Justified" in what sense? Truly don't k...
June 05, 2025 at 01:21
It's the view Nelson Goodman defends in Ways of Worldmaking, and one consequence I found particularly appealing is that it puts you in a position to t...
June 05, 2025 at 00:27
Agreed, but I would have thought "the limits of what we know how to investigate". At least that's how I think of naturalism; it's a program for furthe...
June 04, 2025 at 22:00
The intent of putting it this way was just to suggest that you might not ever be aware of entirely decontextualized (let alone "raw") bits of content....
May 28, 2025 at 16:05
That's close to where I'd find room for philosophy, but it's tricky. Consider emotions. The average person is under the impression that an emotion wel...
May 27, 2025 at 23:30
The first question is, fundamentally, empirical ? not just about me, but in general: is this an experience people have? The second question is still e...
May 27, 2025 at 19:11
This is the main thing I find so puzzling about your approach. (You seem to think it's phenomenology, and I think it's rather the opposite.) Rememberi...
May 27, 2025 at 03:58
Convince me that's either (a) not already a theory about how mental life works, or (b) it's a good theory, a reasonable theory. Yes, yes, but you seem...
May 26, 2025 at 03:05
Oh I don't think so. There have been several interesting points raised (by you, @"Dawnstorm", et al). No, my post was really just about methodology, b...
May 26, 2025 at 00:35
.
May 25, 2025 at 01:50
And you ask me for evidence! A lot of empty chin-stroking. How you can take this seriously --
May 19, 2025 at 00:50
The evidence for what? For your assertion not applying to me?
May 19, 2025 at 00:37
I expect I'll do as a representative secularist, and I have never in my entire life been afraid that one or another religion might turn out to be true...
May 19, 2025 at 00:30
What do you mean "us", kemosabe?
April 29, 2025 at 22:26
I'm sympathetic, but this is patently false. If I want to die, I might very well seek out poisonous beverages. I have elsewhere argued at some length ...
April 29, 2025 at 21:33
This is demonstrably false. (I suspect you were misled by the mobile version having search in two different menus.) Either you had never run across th...
April 11, 2025 at 22:25
It does work better as a companion to the first video. The basic idea is that he has his camera mounted on a jib so that he can raise and lower it. At...
January 10, 2025 at 17:00
For the second video I posted, the first five minutes goes over his camera setup and the math he is going to be checking. He explains exactly what mea...
January 10, 2025 at 16:40
And a reply to things "looking pretty flat." Dan Olson happens to live not too far from a perfect spot to test whether the earth is curved or flat, a ...
January 10, 2025 at 16:33
That covers the whole flat earth cultural thing. He made a companion piece just about the experiment: https://youtu.be/y8MboQzXO1o?si=_tt1iuZG9PLWk4_u
January 10, 2025 at 16:23
Dan Olson has done the test for you: https://youtu.be/JTfhYyTuT44?si=dnL8Clt_vFlnQuGt
January 10, 2025 at 16:17
Take another look at this argument. Anything odd about it? Anything at all?
January 07, 2025 at 04:39
It is, though I wouldn't lean too heavily on the niceties of phrasing. There are just too many possibilities and too many shades of meaning. Also, I'm...
January 07, 2025 at 03:38
But we all, I presume, want to avoid saying that a potion makes you sleepy because of its virtus dormitiva. The "because" in "because of what they are...
January 05, 2025 at 17:50
Well, that's a question. The thing is, models are sort of inherently hypothetical. They tell you what the world would be like if a duck were right the...
January 05, 2025 at 15:10