Fantastic, I think we've explored down to the nub at this point. Again, thank you for your pointed questions and follow ups. Let me pose another quest...
Thank you, it is always humbling to have someone read a piece of work I've written and enjoy it. I suspected this might be the source of our differenc...
With this question I highly encourage you to read my paper on knowledge that I linked prior. https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/14044/knowledge...
First, I do see your viewpoint and think its a very fair question. It may be that this is a misalignment of philosophical comfort, and I understand th...
Fantastic exploration of how language shapes thinking. Very well written. :) Interesting but not unexpected. I too have found explaining falsifiabilit...
Likewise! Also, I have to compliment your mastery of the written word. Your use of higher level vocabulary in intelligible and clear in ways beyond my...
I tend to be more rational now as I've trained myself, but it was not always so. Early on in life I ran by intuition. If I can go from that in early c...
Agreed. This is more the morality of knowledge and inductions. Whereas the hierarchy of inductions is a rational evaluation, the 'morality' of what sh...
Banno, I have an 8 year old nephew that I've helped raise. Now he's an excitable little fella and sometimes doesn't understand social graces in public...
No, it notes that we can draw a necessary conclusion by examining causation. I wrote it Banno, so if you want to dispute it lets go there. Again, if y...
As am I. You might want to read the paper that I linked in this instance. No, that's not what I'm stating. I stated that if we examine the entirety of...
No, causation ultimately leads to a necessary conclusion. My ultimate point is not to claim causation was necessary. In fact the opposite. It is neces...
I think I see your issue now. To be clear, my conclusion does not violate the intelligibility of what exists. My conclusion is only noting the full sc...
Its impossible to know with our current understanding. What I can claim with 100% confidence is that logically, either way, there is no cause which ex...
One minor suggestion to your own definition. I would remove the term 'arbitrarily'. It may be arbitrary, but it might not. Other than that, I think th...
Thank you for the polite and well written inquiry! It is rare to not get angry pushback. Not that you have to agree with me as this continues, it is j...
My intention at that point is to note that there can be no logical reason for contingent reality. In the case where one reaches the end of the causal ...
My hope is it can help you with those practical goals. An idea, even if it is correct, is no good if it cannot be practically used. Thank you for the ...
It is so refreshing to hear someone who read and understand the premises! Correct. I see what you are saying, but let me counter that slightly. The sc...
Neat project. You might want to read here. https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/14044/knowledge-and-induction-within-your-self-context/p1 I set o...
No. I go over why here. https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/15722/the-logic-of-a-universal-origin-and-meaning/p1 Essentially the universe is unc...
I agree that rehabilitation is normally the best solution. I think we're fundamentally viewing hate as a different thing. Hate is an emotional motivat...
I like this ideal as well. I believe that most people fall under this category. However the reality is that there are some evil and selfish people out...
Fantastic post. Hatred is a desire to eliminate something no matter what value it may have to others. All three. You can feel the fires of hatred yet ...
The cries of those who cannot counter a very simple point. Questioner is an example of what people on this board should be like. We disagree on some f...
I don't want to get stuck on this as these points they were making to other people were never intended as directed at you. The main post of this was t...
No, that is incorrect. Innate and unlearned behaviors are obviously from the brain. The question of course is how much is associated with the brain vs...
My apologies, using it as a search engine is fine. I do not use ChatGPT very often so I was unaware what that referenced. Fair, but you didn't say the...
For kids it can be a little more difficult if someone specifically dressed up a boy or a girl to disguise them, but even at that age its not very diff...
Your source has https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0091302211000252?utm_source=chatgpt.com <- You need to be reading your own pape...
Please do better than chatgpt again. You need to make sure to include sexual orientation in your findings. To my knowledge, most of your papers are de...
I don't know. What it does seem to imply is that sexual orientation is not a processing issue, its an innate brain function. The problem of course is ...
First, my apologies for all these separate posts on your topics, I'm catching up from vacation. I have a major issue with this need to never say anyth...
No, there is a way of feeling like a man. Its sexual. I can grow a beard. I pee a certain way. I have more strength naturally. Its entirely 100% biolo...
I actually don't. I think there are trans sexuals who desire the biological average sex expectations of the opposite sex, and I think desiring that an...
To be clear, anything biological that fits a sex expectation is not gender. Gender is ONLY sociological, and I think this is where the confusion comes...
Back from vacation. Seems like some good conversations happened while I was away. To be clear we mean woman by sex, not gender. And I will not use "wo...
Before you judge, most of us knew the OP from past posts. Darkness had not been doing well. His post was not coming from a purely intellectual place o...
Absolutely. Especially among children and adolescents. My advice is to seek more points of view than you've currently seen. Everything I'm advocating ...
Ah, I'm glad you entered back into the conversation with more information, but you have to understand that I can't keep track of everyone's view of id...
The common definition is that a woman is an adult human female, and a man is an adult human male. It is a biological referent, not a sociological one....
Women are subjects, not objects. Again, a person is not an object, but a subject. Unless you're talking English grammar? In which case we're talking a...
Enough about the strawman. If you're not going to discuss the OP anymore, I'm not going to have a never ending go around on this that isn't introducin...
Completely? Can you clarify what you mean? Its a version of sexism as sex is always involved. Maybe my answers below will help clarify what I mean. It...
A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, ...
Welcome back Questioner! Remember that my definition of gender is aligned with gender theory and you have not shown any credible evidence or argument ...
Thank you! That's a rare compliment. Also thank you for drilling into it more, its good to test it further. I am not saying holding a gender or gender...
But gender is based on sex. Its a belief that a person should act in a certain way in society without regards to biological limitations. "Women should...
Comments