You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Philosophim

Comments

Ok, but liking a rose isn't the same as experiencing redness. What you're saying is that liking the rose is the same as saying the rose is good. Are y...
January 20, 2025 at 18:21
No argument there. All of these are questions of scope. You can explain emotions without neurons if that isn't within your scope. Include that as the ...
January 20, 2025 at 17:20
I am neither arguing for or against spacetime as fundamental. I don't understand the point. Right, I've never even mentioned the Big Bang. Tell you wh...
January 20, 2025 at 15:46
All you've replaced is personal emotion with group emotion. Meaning I could nuke a group that doesn't have the emotions I do to do what I want, and th...
January 20, 2025 at 15:43
But this was in regard to feelings. I don't feel that the rose is red. Red is not a feature of my feeling, its a feature of the light bouncing off the...
January 20, 2025 at 15:32
Something outside of space and time cannot affect space and time. Physics is all about contact and transference. We also have no evidence of anything ...
January 20, 2025 at 15:21
That's because we've limited the scope to that factory only. Increase the scope to the people who planned and built the factory and now we have intent...
January 20, 2025 at 03:52
Well if we could trace its composition over time we would come to a being that had intention when making the object. That fits in fine with my argumen...
January 19, 2025 at 23:08
Sure, I'm not saying they aren't impossible generally, and I definitely am not a fan of infinite regress, but I think they are impossible with the exa...
January 19, 2025 at 23:03
I don't understand what this means, can you go more in depth? For the rest of your replies MoK, I'm just seeing restatements of assertions, not reason...
January 19, 2025 at 21:15
Then the only thing we can reason is that we can all do whatever we want to each other and no one has a reasonable way of saying what can and cannot b...
January 19, 2025 at 16:48
Then good and evil are just synonyms for feelings. At that point why even have the words? You haven't differentiated them from feelings, you've simply...
January 19, 2025 at 15:18
But you have replied in a way that indicates there is one. A person can claim that plants don't need water to live, but then proceed to water their pl...
January 19, 2025 at 15:01
To clarify, I'm addressing my personal opinions on infinite existence. This actually wasn't a criticism of your point. :) I think you misunderstand st...
January 19, 2025 at 01:54
My point is that you were stating a moral fact, but declared there was none. So is pain good or evil? If people who don't feel pain live less, is that...
January 18, 2025 at 17:20
So is everything about our experience. How does good differ from happiness, sadness, like, dislike, etc? If good is not what should be, then is it wha...
January 18, 2025 at 17:12
Its more than that. Its a reference to creating an argument of mysticism to fill in when there's a problem that's difficult to solve. I find the belie...
January 18, 2025 at 17:07
That's simply included in the classification of composition and time. If part of the prior reason for an action included an intelligent being, then in...
January 18, 2025 at 14:34
A definition of a moral fact! :D Is it a fact that they are necessary, or simply a feeling and thus only an opinion? When you include things like reas...
January 18, 2025 at 14:29
These seem to be solid definitions, nice. Agreed. So I personally do not like the idea of an infinite regress, and view it as a 'god of the gaps' argu...
January 18, 2025 at 14:20
Which is fine, but I'm asking you how this applies to what I've written. Do you believe this counters the arguments of the OP, agrees with the argumen...
January 18, 2025 at 05:13
How does this apply to the points of the paper? I feel like you just chimed in with your own viewpoint on something, but it would be great if you coul...
January 17, 2025 at 19:55
Is that a fact, or a feeling? If its a fact, then we have a moral fact. If its a feeling, then what if I feel this is incorrect? Who's right? And that...
January 17, 2025 at 17:22
Well what do you think about this then? https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/15203/in-any-objective-morality-existence-is-inherently-good/p1
January 17, 2025 at 14:46
Hello again Bob! My busy end of 2024 schedule has relented, so I have time again to properly engage with your posts. I'm always a fan of 'God' origin ...
January 17, 2025 at 13:12
Do we know for a fact that there is no moral fact? Do we even need such a claim in your argument? For example, lets say that God did exist and knew al...
January 17, 2025 at 12:56
Sounds good to me. We can like things even if they're ugly.
January 15, 2025 at 05:06
I see, so you think there is something apart from what causes the emotion of beauty, to instead believe that beauty is something as a property which e...
January 14, 2025 at 13:47
I'm glad! I find that whether I arrive at an answer or not, the thinking about it is sometimes the best part of the process. I've give my answer, thou...
January 13, 2025 at 18:51
Fantastic! Can you delve further? Why would symmetry, curvature, etc be beautiful? Is there a combination of object, color and the like which would no...
January 12, 2025 at 16:08
No disagreement here, but what is the underlying aspect that makes something beautiful? My apologies if I'm not volunteering my own thoughts, its more...
January 12, 2025 at 15:34
I think beauty and ugliness are innate parts of a healthy human experience. The more interesting question in my mind is, "What do they mean?" While so...
January 12, 2025 at 13:51
For the actually honest person without psychological issues that wishes to prove the world is round, there are a host of resources to do so. The peopl...
January 10, 2025 at 17:01
No, you would have proven that the world is less round then the experts listed. Again, proven off of incomplete information. Testing refraction is the...
January 10, 2025 at 16:56
Ever heard of the saying, "Enough knowledge to be dangerous?" The problem with the flat Earthers is they're only taking one part of the equation and n...
January 10, 2025 at 16:08
Sure, I'm quite sure the specifics of it are going to be slightly different from my example. My point is the same: Look at how the experts formed thei...
January 10, 2025 at 16:00
First, we can take the claim of scientists and experts and test them ourselves. We can test with measuring shadows like in ancient Rome. We can test b...
January 10, 2025 at 15:44
That didn't answer my question. Which means you know the answer, but were unwilling to admit it. Of course what the kid states is true, even if they d...
January 10, 2025 at 14:08
What specifically is unclear? Let us say that I tell a young kid, "1+1=2". The kid doesn't know what any of it means. They go up to an adult and say, ...
January 10, 2025 at 13:15
Truth is about something concrete, and corresponds to reality. Let me fix this for you: "A true statement is about something concrete, and corresponds...
January 10, 2025 at 12:26
No, its simply noting that things exist apart from what we know or believe. Truth is what is whether its observed or not. Whether its mundane or not. ...
January 10, 2025 at 12:12
No. Truth is what simply is. Whether you know it or not is irrelevant. Again, you're confusing truth with knowledge. Knowledge is a tool; a logical pr...
January 10, 2025 at 11:37
You're making a classic mistake in conflating two separate labels. "Knowledge" and "Truth". What is known is determined through a series of logical de...
January 10, 2025 at 10:39
Science is looking at a situation, coming up with a hypotheses, then testing it. But in this case, most of the words are all clearly defined. Philosop...
January 09, 2025 at 15:27
First, we need to define 'science'. Science does not claim "x is true". Science claims, "We have a hypothesis that X is true, and every attempt to pro...
January 08, 2025 at 10:52
Sure, insects like an ant. They can think, but I'm pretty sure one has never realized its an 'I'. Thinking does not presume one has ever thought of th...
January 05, 2025 at 15:09
This would be incorrect, as there are thinking things that do not have a sense of self. Kant really means, "I think, therefore I am." If one realizes ...
January 05, 2025 at 02:59
You can't know the truth about reality, but you can have knowledge. Read here if you're interested. There's a fantastic summary of the post from the n...
January 03, 2025 at 00:39
I think the word you're looking for is 'pre-requisite', not cause. I can have a 1 and a 1 next to each other and never think of the idea of '2'. The i...
January 02, 2025 at 19:40
I believe beauty is the impression of a being or place which is conducive to existence. Existence being a conglomeration of balanced differences, exis...
December 27, 2024 at 18:09