Deleted User

Let me fix that for you.

Opining with no explanation or support.

A ridiculous statement. By this definition, a statement can be a lie only when the liar has confessed to lying. Ridiculous.

The Brookings Institute cited causal evidence as well. Time for you to irrationally dismiss it. In fact, the Brookings Institute predicted your dismis...

No need to respond further. If you're content with your slogan re the rise in hate crimes in the United States, you obviously don't care about the vic...

Always a convenient end-stop slogan for the infatuated.

Welcome, to the forum!

The debate will continue after you've addressed the research from the Brookings Institute, referenced above.

Gray matter, absolutely.

I don't think we'll really know if we've taken the Orwellian turn until after the 2020, and if Trump wins, after the 2024 election. Alarmism hits me o...

The first stupid thing was doubtless the first thing you said this morning. :lol: Anyway, apparently research from the Brookings Institute isn't enoug...

I appreciate your appreciation. Starting to feel like I understand something about this debate.

Spoken from a pedestal of privilege. Trump's lies damage lives. "Even more alarmingly, there is a clear correlation between Trump campaign events and ...

Still waiting for an answer to this one...

You don't seem to know what this word means. The words people say certainly tell us something about the people who say them. Do you dispute this fact?

That's laughably understated. Trump is the King of PR. He might as well have studied with Bernays.

Quite a bit. But I've insulted you enough. I'll keep it to myself. One thing I will mention: It means you value hilarity over veracity. That's just ch...

So you find nothing at all objectionable in his habit of making false and misleading statements?

Well. That tells us a lot about you as a person.

Good to know. So I'll ask you again: What do you have to say about Trump's well-documented history of making false and misleading statements? Do you t...

Then you must be in support of inviting witnesses - Bolton and Mulvaney, for starters - to testify. Do you support the call for witnesses?

Trump's pathetic attempt to discredit Bolton via tweet: "I NEVER told John Bolton that the aid to Ukraine was tied to investigations into Democrats, i...

:smile: I've been learning a lot.

Yep. A weeping woman in the shadow of the cross of the crucified Trump.

Again: We don't need arguments. We need facts. We need documents and witnesses. But, sure, if you like: Awesome work, Relativist! Thanks for helping u...

A lie. Did you even so much as glance at the articles? Statement from Bolton's lawyer: https://twitter.com/ZekeJMiller/status/1221606673447575552/phot...

Here's an article from the Hill on Bolton's book: https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/480014-bolton-book-alleges-trump-tied-ukraine-aid-freez...

I can't get to the article. Would you be willing to paste it here?

Fact Check Continued In a letter, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said continuing the inquiry without a vote would render the process "devoid of ...

Trump's War on Corruption Trump and GOP killed an energy anti-corruption rule for no good reason, advocates say https://www.cnbc.com/2017/02/14/trump-...

For Republicans, muddy waters are a perfect excuse to shut the whole thing down.

Don't forget to doubt your doubt. There's no reason not to doubt your doubt exists.

Mike Purpura failed to mention Zerkal. Why? “We had this information. It was definitely mentioned there were some issues,” Olena Zerkal told The New Y...

Re whether Ukrainians knew there was a hold on military aid. (Third of Purpura's six 'facts': "3. President Zelensky and high-ranking Ukrainian offici...

Mike Purpura: "As soon as the Ukrainians learned about the hold they asked about it." A misleading statement. More accurately put: "As soon as the hol...

As usual. That's how Palpatine rebranded the Republic the First Galactic Empire.

They're asking us to accept that Donald J. Trump is some kind of anti-corruption crusader. Laughable.

Yep.

Right. He's been liar and a bully for a long, long time.

K. Have a good one.

Too vague to be considered a rebuttal. Your rebuttal doesn't address the specific facts in my fact check. To continue the discussion, please address t...

If you had read my fact check, above, you would know. Go ahead and give it a read.

Vague, unsupported opining.

It's above, in my fact check.

What do you have to say about Trump's well-documented history of false and misleading statements? Do you trust Trump?

Unsupported and vague opining. Emotional content without a factual support.

So-and-so say it's so. So-and-so say it's not. So it's arguable. But you've made up your mind. Because you're a fanatic and have an emotional weakness...

Getting caught has the power to change behavior. Basic psychology. Obvious to anyone who isn't blindy in support of Trump. Especially considering his ...

I can see I've brought a fact to a feeling fight. Enjoy your feelings about Trump. But maybe do some research into Trump's personality and history.

The positive claims and the House's claims to the contrary are both irrelevant.