You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Olivier5

Comments

You're asking the questions and providing the answers now... Very nice, please carry on this discussion with yourself.
August 03, 2020 at 14:45
Says who? Moral discoursers? What part of "in philosophy" don't you understand? Of course not. One can often right a wrong.
August 03, 2020 at 13:26
I would like to point out that the scientific method provides no certainty of being 'right'. All its conclusions are temporary by nature, subject to b...
August 03, 2020 at 10:07
You're most welcome. You may find my answer banal and you'd be right: it is just plain, banal common sense to not trust oneself too much, and to think...
August 03, 2020 at 07:09
Okay. Pretty coherent system. Sorry to have misunderstood you. Where can I read more?
August 02, 2020 at 20:14
We can try and reduce, or otherwise deal with our own ambiguities. Ambiguity is the stuff of philosophy and singularly ethics, and you find it everywh...
August 02, 2020 at 20:05
Hey, it's just an analogy, not a basis. :-)
August 02, 2020 at 19:55
So your want to discard concepts or notions that are not based on observation, and only those ones. Seems like a good idea, like a plumber who would d...
August 02, 2020 at 19:48
Ok. What do you call the ethical field analogous to 'ontology'?
August 02, 2020 at 19:38
Interesting comparison between epistemology and ethics. There are a priori rules (of thumb) in epistemology, such as reblicability of observations (e....
August 02, 2020 at 18:18
Because it's hard to do any philosophy without the use of human concepts. Concepts are tools for the mind. They are necessary to understand anything, ...
August 02, 2020 at 17:48
This particular philosophy you are describing is self-defeating.
August 02, 2020 at 17:43
On the OP, I don't know what philosophy tries to "strip away human concepts to gain a more accurate understanding of the world", but I know that philo...
August 02, 2020 at 17:39
My point entirely. Wherever you feel like drawing it. To seek advice or not in a given situation is a personal choice. I'm not trying to arrive at the...
August 02, 2020 at 17:16
Similarly, the idea that morality and ethics are purely human inventions, as well as the opposite idea, and the whole of philosophy for good measure, ...
August 02, 2020 at 12:45
Regarding the impossibility of exhaustivity in any 'accounting' of outcomes and motives, and the need for a priori rules of thumbs and values, conside...
August 02, 2020 at 12:40
Yep, that's the danger. We are ambiguous by nature, we're prone to dishonesty, including with ourselves. Pfhorrest seems to trust our capacity for exh...
August 02, 2020 at 12:25
That would be impossible to do, because both our sensory observations and our "appetites" are much too numerous to be all accounted for equally. The h...
August 02, 2020 at 07:23
Interesting, though quite speculative of course. We know little, still. E.g. i suspect panspermia theories would throw a wrench in those math.
July 30, 2020 at 18:42
True by definition of what a sine is: a projection.
July 29, 2020 at 18:20
In the gif you shared, the curve is traced by the sine dot going up and down on the vertical axis of the wheel, not by the dot on the circumference. T...
July 29, 2020 at 10:02
I think he is right. A dot on a circle spinning along a straight line traces a cycloid.
July 29, 2020 at 07:01
Thanks, that's useful. It confirms my interpretation that when you evoke "a sea of U1 photons", you are talking about the unreachable limits between w...
July 29, 2020 at 06:57
Ciao Scemo. I'm new here too. I agree that our collective vision may improve in our search for distant turtles. That's the best we can do.
July 28, 2020 at 10:00
That's true, we must think of time as a complex function of something else rather than a straight line from -inf. to +inf. But in my mind it doesn't f...
July 28, 2020 at 09:53
Thanks for the detailed explanation, although the technicalities are largely wasted on me, I'm afraid. The way I understand your take, this perfect si...
July 28, 2020 at 07:36
The begining of time (your X, or t=0) could be another mathematical limit, like what happens when the function 1/x gets close to zero. In this idea, t...
July 28, 2020 at 07:04
I find it hard to think of time as limitted.
July 27, 2020 at 22:10
Ah, good point: there is a mathematical limit in terms of mass to infinite spliting, a limit that is equal to 0 mass, just as there is a solution in t...
July 27, 2020 at 22:08
Given our current technology we can only go so far, but technology can and does evolve. As others have pointed out, I’m talking about atomism, and how...
July 26, 2020 at 11:57
Meh!
July 25, 2020 at 18:44
That's exactly the point of the thread: is there a limit to how fine we can "grind" matter?
July 25, 2020 at 18:42
I'm not saying something is "made of quarks". Only that something can be broken down into quarks. There's a difference.
July 24, 2020 at 06:22
What reasons do you have to believe that a proper theory of consciousness would unite QM and the rest of physics?
July 24, 2020 at 06:16
Fair enough, there is a slight difference, but you get the point of the metaphor nevetheless.
July 23, 2020 at 16:44
Until it proves otherwise, of course. Okay, I get it. But what are the pathways and "steps" from a cosmic sea of U1 photons to, say, a quark, a proton...
July 23, 2020 at 16:42
I just think that "measurement" is nothing an amoeba can't do. All this talk about human measurement determining wave functions is just pre-Darwinian ...
July 23, 2020 at 16:37
This doesn't mean consciousness has some magic pan-universe powers. It's only a tool we are using.
July 23, 2020 at 16:24
Actually, in this mind experiment, Schrodinger sees a box. Not a wavefunction for what could potentially be a box. And Schrodinger only proposed this ...
July 16, 2020 at 05:29
The cat in the box is an observer too. If one really believes that observers collapse wave functions, then any cat can do so, including Schrodinger's....
July 16, 2020 at 00:03
Let's agree that a lack of certainty is not a problem. The experiments at CERN and other particle accelerators seem to show that the size of the piece...
July 15, 2020 at 23:55
It's a meaningful objection to the idea that CERN will find the answer to "could it be particles all the way down?" anytime soon, as Banno seemed to i...
July 15, 2020 at 23:39
It's not my problem. I am fine with the idea that science will never reach certainty on much.
July 15, 2020 at 23:00
Why consciouness, of all things?
July 15, 2020 at 22:57
The good people in CERN haven't reached certainty quite yet.
July 15, 2020 at 22:55
Okay but until they do, do you think "particles all the way down" is possible?
July 15, 2020 at 22:51
It should also be reduced in North America and Europe. A few ideas: - ban private funding of election campaigns or cap it to a certain low maximum - g...
July 15, 2020 at 14:44
It doesn't matter. Something exists that hears voices. By convention this something is called "I" in English. You can call it Tartenpion if you want t...
July 15, 2020 at 14:34
I think the cat would disagree with that.
July 15, 2020 at 14:23
The world is one; it's not neatly divided into micro and macro scales. E.g. radioactivity, a quantic phenomenon, is an important cause of genetic muta...
July 10, 2020 at 20:46