You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Wayfarer

Comments

If a species evolves to the point where it can recognise 'the law of the excluded middle', does that entail that 'the law of the included middle' can ...
January 04, 2025 at 21:09
The above also applies to number.
January 04, 2025 at 21:03
Thank you, appreciated. I’ve found some articles on the topic also.
January 04, 2025 at 01:22
Sure humans evolved, and so too the ability to count, speak, tell stories and much else besides. But that doesn't mean that Frege's 'metaphysical prim...
January 03, 2025 at 22:39
Do you understand the difference between them? Not according to your personal philosophy, but what would be said in an encylopedia or what you would s...
January 03, 2025 at 22:11
If you mean, materialism is a tendency at a certain point of the development of cultures, then sure. It is also true that it is a belief system that i...
January 03, 2025 at 21:34
But you've said a number of times that you advocate scientism and materialism. Scientism is the belief that science is the adjuticator of all knowledg...
January 03, 2025 at 21:32
The blind spot is a well-known phenomenon which arises where the optic nerve attaches to the cornea. As a consequence there is a blind spot in the mid...
January 03, 2025 at 21:11
Language and the symbolic forms which characterise the cellular activities of organisms cannot be reduced solely to chemistry. That’s one implication ...
January 03, 2025 at 20:20
There's a very good book that can be found online Thinking Being: An Introduction to Metaphysics in the Classical Tradition, Eric S Perl. The explanat...
January 03, 2025 at 06:57
Agree. The essay puts it as follows: Put another way, the very fact of the controversy counts against a materialist explanation.
January 03, 2025 at 06:42
Let's unpack that, there are elements I can go along with, others not so much. That is indeed what reification means, and I agree that 'res cogitans',...
January 03, 2025 at 06:36
I couldn’t make sense of your comparison. Look at the passage above your post, specifically: Agree or disagree with that proposition? Why? The differe...
January 03, 2025 at 04:58
This is something h.sapiens can do that no other creature can do. If there’s anything problematic it is the inability to see the significance of that.
January 03, 2025 at 04:47
We’re talking about the faculty of reason. I think we take it for granted without noticing how significant it is. Consider what it enables.
January 03, 2025 at 00:27
Very important work - pleased there’s someone else reading it.
January 03, 2025 at 00:23
Indeed. But also note As I understand platonism, neither would it. This would be a reification, objectification of the act of act of counting. But it ...
January 02, 2025 at 23:10
You and others might find this essay interesting Aristotle was Right After All, James Franklin. (I don't agree with his depiction of the 'other world'...
January 02, 2025 at 22:40
Yes, but I'm finding it a real hard slog to maintain focus. I figure that as he has to penetrate the habitual cynicism of the current philosophical pr...
January 02, 2025 at 22:35
I'm not an admirer of object-oriented ontology, (which I suspect was a catchphrase swiped from information technology.) That distinction it makes betw...
January 02, 2025 at 21:41
I’ve become very interested in (although not very knowledgeable about) the idea of the ‘divine intellect’ in Aristotle and Platonism generally. The ba...
January 02, 2025 at 21:11
I see that Tao as being one of the seminal forms of expression of 'the unconditioned' - not actually a hard case to make, considering many of the pass...
January 02, 2025 at 21:05
So, you say mathematical proofs are empirical? I think you're on shaky ground there but I now know better than to argue with you about such things, so...
January 02, 2025 at 20:51
You certainly sound a highly imaginative and interesting writer! I am not qualified to comment on the intricacies of Taoist principles, as I mentioned...
January 02, 2025 at 20:50
However, one has to grasp the concept to make such distinctions, so it is not something that can be ascertained by observation alone. It is deduced.
January 02, 2025 at 20:47
I beg your pardon, it was a mistake. Interesting further points there on Hegel, with whom I am not well acquainted.
January 02, 2025 at 20:39
Of course - but there's another 'sub-theme' here which is deeply connected to this whole debate. That is the belief in the pre-modern world that the C...
January 02, 2025 at 20:17
No doubt. There are very many resonances between Tao, early Buddhism and Stoicism, albeit Taoism and Buddhism both had beliefs in immortality in vario...
January 02, 2025 at 20:14
Also what Arthur Schopenhauer says, but when he says it, he's a miserable pessimist. When a Taoist master says it, it is Eastern wisdom.
January 02, 2025 at 07:47
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQyE9uqcHj8 Heed Bernie's warning
January 02, 2025 at 04:43
That sounds like a hard problem ;-)
January 02, 2025 at 00:30
I'm following your other thread on Rödl and also reading the text. I don't need or expect anything from anyone. We're here to discuss ideas, and these...
January 02, 2025 at 00:29
I apologize, it was careless of me to use that term and I will not do so again. But then, as I explained, the view that 'mind is to brain as digestion...
January 02, 2025 at 00:19
But you notice, I presented an argument. I said, the analogy of stomach and enzymes is insufficient as an analogy for brain and thought, on the basis ...
January 02, 2025 at 00:03
You're not doing your case any favour by citing cartoons.
January 01, 2025 at 23:44
If you could make lumps from air.... :rofl:
January 01, 2025 at 23:32
That's an essay question. I cribbed some of the lecture notes but never sat the exam. Regardless, hope the point is clear. It's not that. I've explain...
January 01, 2025 at 23:22
See this excerpt from some lecture notes on Wittgenstein: This is entirely in keeping with the phenomenological analysis. Again, it does not call into...
January 01, 2025 at 22:40
:chin: This is your congenital misrepresentation of what I actually say, but no matter how many times I try and set it straight, you never get it. Wha...
January 01, 2025 at 22:27
And this would be Arthur Schopenhauer's criticism of Armstrong:
January 01, 2025 at 22:19
Sure. There was a famous expression which circulated in Enlightenment Europe, that 'the brain secretes thought as the liver secretes bile', spoken by ...
January 01, 2025 at 22:13
I don't quite follow your argument. Again, I don't see what I'm arguing as exceptionally obtuse or difficult. The element of Platonism that I appeal t...
January 01, 2025 at 21:48
It might be mentioned in passing that Peirce's academic career was pretty brief. He lectured at Johns Hopkins University from 1879 to 1884, during whi...
January 01, 2025 at 06:21
Happy New Year to you also, :party: and thanks for the kind words. That's an assertion not an argument. How would you justify that? And what do you me...
January 01, 2025 at 06:02
Only that the sense of 'is' implicit in 'A=A' seems of a different order to that conveyed in 'The cat is on the mat' or 'that apple is red'. In mathem...
January 01, 2025 at 05:11
Regardless the general point holds - that Confucian values were sometimes parodied in Taoist literature as representing social custom rather that the ...
January 01, 2025 at 03:06
It was a single sentence. I’m sure there were many things it doesn’t include.
January 01, 2025 at 02:02
The customary explanation is that Confucius (Kung Futzu) represents social propriety and custom while the ‘true man of the Way’ is basically unbound b...
January 01, 2025 at 01:16
Personal predilection. The first non-dualism I encountered was Advaita. I felt I couldn’t form as clear an idea of the subtleties of Tao although it h...
January 01, 2025 at 01:11
I've had years of dispute on this forum about the meaning of the term 'ontology'. At one point in the past, etymologyonline.com had the etymology of t...
December 31, 2024 at 23:35