You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Wayfarer

Comments

Thanks. This is an idea I've been researching, and I would appreciate your view of it. It's often said that Aquinas was a realist, not an idealist, bu...
January 08, 2025 at 09:28
No, Frege was much later than Kant and was critiquing Kant. And Frege is indeed mentioned right at the outset of Rödl’s book. Remember the title of th...
January 08, 2025 at 02:55
:pray:
January 08, 2025 at 02:51
I would have thought you’d agree with:
January 08, 2025 at 02:47
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought_(essay)
January 08, 2025 at 02:17
Frege’s contention is that the content of thought (<p>) can be entirely objective and independent of any particular subject. Frege’s emphasis is on th...
January 08, 2025 at 02:14
Is the contention from both Kant and Rödl simply that any thought that <p> is necessarily entertained by a conscious subject? Meaning that the subject...
January 08, 2025 at 02:06
Incomprehension followed by profanities. True to form.
January 08, 2025 at 01:50
But it does more than that. Yes. there is an external reality, but no, we don’t see it as it is. That surely provides scope for philosophical analysis...
January 08, 2025 at 01:44
I'd agree with that. I've tried to field your many repetitive complaints in good faith for a lot of years, but it does become wearisome.
January 07, 2025 at 23:30
Of course not. When I cite a source for support, it is to orient my arguments with respect to others, standard practice in debates. And you're what Ka...
January 07, 2025 at 23:10
Hence the distinction between what exists and what is real. I said, I know it's a difficult distinction to make and that it's controversial, and that ...
January 07, 2025 at 22:48
There's no accounting for taste, especially in popular music. Some people like Neil Diamond.
January 07, 2025 at 22:20
'You're the Voice' would be preferable. However, shouldn't be forgotten that voting is mandatory. When my son moved permanently to the US, he would re...
January 07, 2025 at 21:25
that's right - all the folks who man the voting booths and conduct the ballot, many of them volunteers. The latest it can be is May 2025 but it could ...
January 07, 2025 at 08:46
Because as a rational sentient being, you can number them. The point about objects of intellectual cognition such as numbers, geometric and scientific...
January 07, 2025 at 05:25
well, as I said, more's the pity that nuclear has been made subject to partisan politics. It's too big an issue, but I guess if Dutton looses, that wi...
January 07, 2025 at 01:04
Splendidly put sir. They arise from our experience and interpretation of the world. See https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/955313 for a...
January 07, 2025 at 01:03
I've found a book on Husserl, phenomenology and mathematics. Tough going but I think my very simple grasp of philosophy of maths can co-exist peaceful...
January 07, 2025 at 00:31
Regardless, I noticed last night that Hanson-Young was talking up the necessity of supporting Albanese over the Coalition. The Greens are losing voter...
January 07, 2025 at 00:18
Which is why I keep mentioning Thinking Being. This book has been put online, in reality it's out of print and when available was very expensive. The ...
January 06, 2025 at 22:55
I think there is confusion around the term 'platonic realm'. There is a domain of natural numbers, right? Where is it? Obviously a silly question; 'do...
January 06, 2025 at 22:47
I contemplate the idea that the appearance of organic life is also the appearance of intentionality in rudimentary form, beginning with the physical d...
January 06, 2025 at 20:28
But doesn’t that assume the very separation between mind and world that elsewhere you’re very keen to criticize? Humans are, after all, part of the ve...
January 06, 2025 at 20:16
You're asking a very big question in this OP, but not a question that science itself can answer, because it’s about judgement. Scientific methods deli...
January 06, 2025 at 09:58
I’m generally in agreement with everything you’ve said in this thread. But one of the thoughts it has triggered in me, is the role of language and, th...
January 06, 2025 at 07:32
And, more than ‘observing’. Cats and dog are quite capable of ‘observing’ the things humans observe. But only h.sapiens can measure and quantify. (I r...
January 06, 2025 at 07:13
thereby highlighting an intriguing link between physical causation and logical necessity, which today’s philosophy generally describes in terms of sep...
January 06, 2025 at 06:59
You mean, alternative mathematical systems that could produce similar results? A big part of that paper is not that maths just happens to work, but th...
January 06, 2025 at 01:21
Can you explain what about Wigner’s famous paper you think is confused?
January 06, 2025 at 00:28
It’s just a focus, and Rödl’s book is very focused. Otherwise, questions like ‘what is consciousness’ and ‘are animals conscious’ just become like hun...
January 05, 2025 at 23:02
Context! Sebastian Rödl's book is about human reason. The title is "Self-Consciousness and Reason: An Introduction to Absolute Idealism" (Google Books...
January 05, 2025 at 21:53
As far as animal intelligence is concerned, a rudimentary sense of 'self and other' would characterise any life whatever, even that of single-celled o...
January 05, 2025 at 20:43
Actually that makes perfect sense to me, little as I know about physical cosmology.
January 05, 2025 at 08:31
So might I enquire where consciousness/awareness enters the picture as you see it? Causal or consequential?
January 05, 2025 at 07:57
You mean the one from the University of Canterbury? Dark Energy May Not Exist Would that comprise an 'overall increase of intelligibility'? Does that ...
January 05, 2025 at 03:48
Any examples come to mind?
January 05, 2025 at 03:10
Sebastian Rödl is Professor of Practical Philosophy at Leipzig University and an advocate of absolute idealism, associated with G W Hegel: “According ...
January 05, 2025 at 02:34
I probably should not leap into this breech, but I think I understand the meta-philosophical reason for this. I think it's linked to something which J...
January 05, 2025 at 00:11
Oh. Well Jim Franklin is indeed a UNSW philosopher, so an easy misidentification to make.
January 05, 2025 at 00:02
Jim Franklin was a customer of Campus Computers at Usyd in the late 1980’s, when I was manager there. He was then quite a gnomic figure back then with...
January 04, 2025 at 23:50
Yes, agree! I didn’t read it carefully enough. I read one, and then four, but now you mention it, 3 hits the nail on the head.
January 04, 2025 at 23:44
Thanks for the link, will read with interest. As I’ve often mentioned, Armstrong was HoD when I was an undergrad, and as an aspiring counter-cultural ...
January 04, 2025 at 23:21
Yes, you can see it, and report accordingly, as a rational sentient being.
January 04, 2025 at 23:15
I vote '1'. Just as Kant (and Husserl) say, 'transcendental' means 'necessary for thought but not accessible to it'. We're generally *not* self-consci...
January 04, 2025 at 23:06
I did just that, but you're in such a hurry to reply that you didn't notice. Sure thing. Hope you enjoy your time here, but might serve not to spread ...
January 04, 2025 at 22:44
But without any supporting argument.
January 04, 2025 at 22:38
I'm beginning to form the view that you're too confused to debate with. You will jump in with an appeal to Mario Bunge, who you mention frequently, wh...
January 04, 2025 at 22:35
No kidding. Anyone will know that corpses do not have appetites. I'm not opposing them. I'm saying they don't support the view that neural states are ...
January 04, 2025 at 22:29
Fluff. Let me lay it out for you. Bunge et al, the scientific materialists want to bring mind under the ambit of the neurosciences - firm, objective, ...
January 04, 2025 at 21:39