You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Wayfarer

Comments

Said 'wag' was actually Fred Hoyle, an eminent British cosmologist who never accepted the idea; in a BBC radio interview. I'm chipping in because I ha...
February 26, 2025 at 04:08
My big-picture view is somewhat like those historians of ideas who see the collective consciousness of h.sapiens evolving through, and associated with...
February 26, 2025 at 03:10
Well, Frank, I did post it in four separate sections, allowing time for commentary on each section. But if you can't be bothered reading, then I can't...
February 26, 2025 at 00:53
Isn't that extremely reductionistic? Humans are clearly capable of great empathy, but also of terrible cruelty. But attempting to engineer compassion ...
February 26, 2025 at 00:48
As described in the essay.
February 25, 2025 at 23:33
That topic being ‘nihilism’ ;-) I see your point about faux stoicism but it’s also a pretty cynical take. I don’t think you can paint everyone with th...
February 25, 2025 at 22:05
Trump will be asking, where's the return? Can't we mine an asteroid, or something? What's the point of that thing? All it does is take pictures. Billi...
February 25, 2025 at 09:03
It’s a dark day in history when the US refuses to condemn Russia’s invasion of Ukraine at the UN, because Trump :heart: Putin. https://www.reuters.com...
February 25, 2025 at 08:29
Is this at all related to the immortality of the soul?
February 25, 2025 at 07:59
‘transcendental unity of apperception’.
February 25, 2025 at 07:45
A potentially significant judgement - from NY Times (I’m all out of gift links): It’s a very transparent tactic - nobody is responsible for these mass...
February 25, 2025 at 03:11
Indeed. Which is a perfect segue to Part IV: Detachment East… Interestingly, the Stoic concept of the Logos bears a striking resemblance to the Chines...
February 25, 2025 at 02:57
Time itself is mind-dependent. Given that, we know there was a time before h.sapiens evolved. The two levels, again. It is logically possible that the...
February 25, 2025 at 00:12
No, I reject that emphatically. Again, 'before h.sapiens existed' is itself mind-dependent. That doesn't mean it is all in the mind. Yours is the act ...
February 24, 2025 at 23:57
Interesting and not something I'm familiar with. I've been reading Jonas' book of late, which I find overall amenable (not finished it.) I'm familiar ...
February 24, 2025 at 23:55
But it doesn't, Banno. 'The world' outside any mind has no structure or any features. Structure and features are imposed on it by the mind. This doesn...
February 24, 2025 at 23:29
Run along now Banno. Enjoy your sandwiches.
February 24, 2025 at 23:19
Important to know that this is true in one way, but not in another. It is empirically true that there is vast world outside my knowledge of it - heck,...
February 24, 2025 at 23:01
They're my feelings, also. I'm learning a lot from the readings of the various postmodernist philosophers, but I don't share with them the distrust of...
February 24, 2025 at 22:49
No, I have not backtracked. You asked three questions, about novelty, error and consensus, and I addressed them, with reference to transcendental idea...
February 24, 2025 at 22:44
Again, if you read carefully, you would have understood it was something I was not obliged to deny in the first place. It is only characteristic of wh...
February 24, 2025 at 22:36
It's not a yes/no question.
February 24, 2025 at 22:22
I never said otherwise! It's only your continuous and tendentious misreading of what I'm saying that is at issue.
February 24, 2025 at 22:06
As always you misconstrue the nature of 'mind'. What you are saying is that idealism claims that the world is the creation of your mind, or my mind, o...
February 24, 2025 at 21:59
For instance? The only example that stands out to me is Albert Camus. The 'comprehensive subjective construct' sounds much like Kuhn's use of 'paradig...
February 24, 2025 at 21:44
I think there needs to be a sense of enquiry, of wanting to understand.
February 24, 2025 at 10:31
Earlier today I was served up yet another youtube talk on this very thing, by an Oxford cognitive scientist (which I almost posted but decided not to)...
February 24, 2025 at 10:00
hmm. I think it's very much your own interpretation, but I will yield the floor for now.
February 24, 2025 at 08:46
Hey you’ll like this one. I was discussing Chalmers with Chuck (as I now refer to ChatGPT) and we were both of the view that Daniel Dennett’s eliminat...
February 24, 2025 at 07:56
I can't see that at all. The paragraphs that I've just been studying are those concerning his critique of naturalism: Here, he's saying that while log...
February 24, 2025 at 07:42
You continually mistake the limits of your understanding, for those of others. That’s why I stopped interacting with you a few months ago - oh, that, ...
February 24, 2025 at 07:10
As I’ve patiently explained many times, I do not say that nothing exists without the mind. I say that without the mind, there can be neither existence...
February 24, 2025 at 06:47
He should tell Trump there’s no use drilling for oil, then.
February 24, 2025 at 06:45
https://youtu.be/bEtafYMzxmo?si=AGbB6LNwfg0hG1Uk
February 24, 2025 at 04:49
Excellent point! I have noticed in Mah?y?na Buddhism, there is a lovely expression, that emptiness and compassion are like the two wings of a bird - t...
February 24, 2025 at 03:30
It's an especially hard problem for the generally-accepted forms of scientific naturalism, as they assume at the outset that whatever is real must be ...
February 24, 2025 at 03:27
I have the feeling that you’re incorrect in this analysis although I’m not well versed enough in Husserl to put my finger on why. Perhaps you might co...
February 24, 2025 at 03:14
I’d like to differentiate myself from the thread owner. And the so-called ‘step too far’ you keep accusing of me is nothing of the kind. It is plainly...
February 24, 2025 at 03:04
My understanding is not that time doesn't exist, but that it has an ineluctably subjective aspect. Meaning that the reality of time is not solely obje...
February 24, 2025 at 02:51
I should add that I can't claim to have reached any plateau of serene detachment, although I do see the point.
February 23, 2025 at 23:16
I see your point, but in the context of Galilean physics, the emphasis was certainly on the measurable attributes of bodies and its delineation from A...
February 23, 2025 at 23:09
The Virtue of Detachment As seen above, a scientific orientation often leads us to assume that objectivity is the sole criterion for what is real. Thi...
February 23, 2025 at 21:36
Again, amazing. The depth and nuances are quite remarkable, as also the apparent self-awareness ('I suspect....') (I've been getting help with redesig...
February 23, 2025 at 21:30
There's a book-length article on IEP, The Phenomenological Reduction. I'm still going through it but it's a dense and rich entry. The passage I'll men...
February 23, 2025 at 21:07
whereas I'm inclined to grant the subject a kind of ontological primacy. That would be what is traditionally called chaos, would it not?
February 23, 2025 at 06:45
I’m personally very impressed by Jamie Raskin - I thought he was a stand-out during Comer’s ridiculous kangaroo court hearings about Biden’s supposed ...
February 23, 2025 at 02:58
Nice to know ;-)
February 22, 2025 at 23:57
I understand your perplexity. What drew me to philosophy was the quest for enlightenment. This is something that is often said to be 'spiritual' but t...
February 22, 2025 at 22:40
Thank you :pray: That’s not quite it. The allegory of ‘me looking out the window’ is the self-awareness of the act of looking. A reflection of oneself...
February 22, 2025 at 22:14