You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Wayfarer

Comments

It's philosophical.
November 11, 2016 at 21:09
You see, it's impossible to argue with someone who defines basic terms, like 'identity','reason', and so on, so as to play games on a computer. And th...
November 11, 2016 at 13:39
Would you agree that if two people put coins in a vending machine, and got out the same snack food the outputs would be identical? Would you agree tha...
November 11, 2016 at 13:34
Anyway, that claim is wrong on my view. Why?
November 11, 2016 at 13:26
The argument is that the information and the representation are different. So, typically, rather than dealing with the argument, you say, 'I disagree ...
November 11, 2016 at 13:15
People are always criticizing comments for not being arguments. Well, where's the argument here? Take a proposition that is determinative - the instru...
November 11, 2016 at 13:09
That's the dilemma of Western civilization in a few words. It ought not to be like that, but there's a reason why it is. You seem to be trying to brid...
November 11, 2016 at 13:00
From the POV of physics, does any of that exist? No. But this is where the 'epistemic cut' comes in. There is a level of order found in biological sys...
November 11, 2016 at 08:02
Consciousness is obviously a biological phenomenon. It is spoken about from a biological perspective, but that doesn't mean it can be understood solel...
November 11, 2016 at 07:46
Interesting question! I suppose in computer science the rules are clear enough, computer language>assembly langage>machine code (something like that, ...
November 11, 2016 at 07:20
They are all examples of the idea that information and the way the meaning is information is encoded are separable. A more simple example is that you ...
November 11, 2016 at 06:31
There is a relationship between a code and its meaning. but the relationship is not one of identity for the reasons @Tom has given. Why this is so is ...
November 11, 2016 at 02:12
I suspect you're young. In any case it seems rather an egocentric view of life. I think the element that is absent in your OP is the sense of somethin...
November 10, 2016 at 21:23
@Metaphysician Undercover - I am going to create a separate thread on the topic we're discussing, it's a subject in its own right.
November 10, 2016 at 21:00
that piece Rock Thrush linked to is a traditional American gospel song called Wayfaring Stranger, I think it was a reference to my screen name. I have...
November 10, 2016 at 20:35
I agree, it is very important to understand that every human being has value. That is actually central to Christian ethics. The central idea of Christ...
November 10, 2016 at 10:03
I think 'every being has value' is too broad. I think the original saying that you're referencing is 'every human being is an end in themselves', whic...
November 10, 2016 at 06:42
It isn't a matter of reducing qualities to quantities, but of quantitative measurement. Whenever you wish to subject a question to scientific analysis...
November 10, 2016 at 05:48
Of course. Hence this discussion. But if I were to refer to any kind of 'objective morality' or 'moral absolute', then that is generally interpreted t...
November 10, 2016 at 02:14
"Objective" means what it says, i.e. pertaining to or inherent in an object or object of analysis. Colloquially, you might say that a persons objectiv...
November 10, 2016 at 00:55
Hey Metaphysician Undercover - I know this discussion is between yourself and Sapientia, but I did try and address that very point in this post, refer...
November 09, 2016 at 22:39
It's a textbook case.
November 09, 2016 at 22:22
I think it is objectively the case. You recall the long period when Sanders was refusing to concede, and there were a series of debates between he and...
November 09, 2016 at 22:04
Au contraire, BC, I think they've tried 'smart' and it hasn't worked. Trump won by trying 'dumb' - slogans, fear, hatred, 'the other', anger, doubt, a...
November 09, 2016 at 21:48
Now that it's happened, I hope all the dire predictions are wrong, that Trump turns out OK. But honestly, apart from hand waving and talk about 'harne...
November 09, 2016 at 20:59
Michael Moore predicted it correctly in August: http://www.smh.com.au/world/us-election/michael-moore-meet-the-man-who-got-this-election-right-2016110...
November 09, 2016 at 20:41
Cast your mind back to 2000 when Bush beat Gore by 300 votes. I will always believe, had Gore won, the world would have been better off, not that we'l...
November 09, 2016 at 20:21
Say goodbye to climate change action, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the bans on drilling and mining in sensitive wildlife areas. Trump is f...
November 09, 2016 at 20:11
My understanding now (and it constantly evolves) is that the insights preserved in the great philosophical and spiritual traditions represent profound...
November 09, 2016 at 20:02
I see Trump as 'the triumph of television'. People can't differentiate reality and TV; when Trump waves his arms and says he's going to make America g...
November 09, 2016 at 19:39
OK, I can concede that point. Say it's something akin to the placebo effect on a large scale; the power of belief to affect medical outcomes. We you m...
November 09, 2016 at 19:36
They have protocols. The 'Lives of Saints' provide an archive of such materials, what criteria they use to make judgements, and so on, going back hund...
November 09, 2016 at 19:32
When argument fails, resort to insult, eh TS? That should do the trick.
November 09, 2016 at 19:06
Here's the Wikipedia entry on 'demagogue': Right on the mark. Note the observation about 'changing democracy into dictatorship'.
November 09, 2016 at 19:05
You don't know what you're talking about TS. You define words to suit your arguments and then ridicule others for not knowing what you mean. Your post...
November 09, 2016 at 19:03
It's not logically fallacious, you're just saying that as far as you're concerned, it's unbelievable. You have a 'will not to believe'. Incidentally, ...
November 09, 2016 at 18:53
Trump succeeded because of the fact that there are many people who are easily fooled.
November 09, 2016 at 10:26
Another comment from the article: So - science has shown the religious accounts of creation are baloney, because we're piss and not wind! X-)
November 09, 2016 at 09:15
Right. So the whole thing about 'brain=mind' boils down to whether concepts can be described as being physical. I say not. The arguments are long and ...
November 09, 2016 at 09:03
I don't know if this is for real, but it's out there. http://www.dynamicdata.com.au/images/IMG_2468.JPG What I said. Although I hope in all this, to b...
November 09, 2016 at 08:30
I think it's the triumph of television, of appearance over reality. Can't see a single good thing coming out of this, it inverts the exaltation and jo...
November 09, 2016 at 07:59
I would sign up in a flash to hear lectures from Prof. Pickstock
November 09, 2016 at 07:50
Everyone I know here in Sydney is scared, shocked and dissappointed. We thought, at the end of the day, the good guys were going to win. Now it looks ...
November 09, 2016 at 05:20
Kid to Dad (looking downcast and anxious): Don't worry, Dad, if Donald Trump wins, it won't be the end of the world. Dad to Kid: ------ I'm predicting...
November 09, 2016 at 05:01
The obvious problem is that nobody can agree on what constitutes 'an ethical progrram'. I mean, if you look at politics at this time in history, what ...
November 09, 2016 at 02:03
The point of the book that I provided a link to, is that it documents the procedures involved in declaring supernatural intervention. Part of these pr...
November 09, 2016 at 00:49
I agree theology ought not to be taught as part of the curriculum of a secular university, unless under the heading of comparative religion, history o...
November 09, 2016 at 00:33
Right! This is actually the basis of Hume's famous 'is/ought' problem Which is central to the entire debate about naturalism and ethics. Basically it ...
November 08, 2016 at 23:37
Where did anyone ask me anything resembling anything in the realm of "Is there actually such a thing as personal identity?" You seem to have forgotten...
November 08, 2016 at 23:13
In your conversations with csalisbury, you wouldn't acknowledge that there is actually such a thing as 'personal identity', or that it is, at any rate...
November 08, 2016 at 22:40