You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Wayfarer

Comments

The universe of modern science is what can be measured with telescopes and so forth, so of course it would be absurd to consider a universe so constru...
May 19, 2019 at 09:45
Don’t you think ‘a feel for the indifferent’ is somehow oxymoronic?
May 19, 2019 at 08:56
It's not just a tool, or rather, if it is, it's a meta-tool, something used to make tools. Knowing maths, you can make tools you could otherwise not: ...
May 19, 2019 at 05:02
I fail to see anything ‘sublime’ in it. Well, the problem is posited with a solution. Otherwise, it would be pessimistic.
May 19, 2019 at 04:45
Finally a gutsy Republican Congressman, Justin Amash, has stated that he believes there are grounds for impeachment in the Mueller findings. Hopefully...
May 19, 2019 at 04:43
Earning your name again ;-)
May 18, 2019 at 20:53
The point about qm, is that it casts into doubt the notion that on a fundamental level, the real universe exists in a particular way, independently of...
May 18, 2019 at 07:21
WaPo
May 18, 2019 at 05:58
The point was simply that there is nothing like that in Camus' philosophy. His philosophy was called 'absurdism', that life is fundamentally absurd, a...
May 18, 2019 at 04:46
Zen is grounded in the literature of Prajñ?p?ramit? which can be literally translated as 'wisdom gone beyond'. This is a matter of fact, not interpret...
May 18, 2019 at 04:03
Of course it's not. Zen is grounded in the literature of Prajñ?p?ramit? which can be literally translated as 'wisdom gone beyond'. The denial of anyth...
May 18, 2019 at 03:50
So, what in Camus’ Sisyphus corresponds with Nirv??a? Certainly in some readings of Zen - ‘Chop wood, draw water’ - there’s a sense of finding the tra...
May 18, 2019 at 02:17
I'm not trained in physics past high school level, but I've read quite a bit about the philosophical implications of quantum mechanics. It's a lot mor...
May 17, 2019 at 22:06
Perhaps your’re right. As as I said before, I don’t see how strict determinism can be defended in light of uncertainty. It seems to undermine it at th...
May 17, 2019 at 06:43
The problem with this criticism is that mistakenly equates what is 'out there', in other words what exists in the manifold domain of objects, with the...
May 17, 2019 at 02:57
Well, this grew out of a consideration of the nature of ideas, and whether or in what sense they're physical. In the case of plans, formulas, and spec...
May 17, 2019 at 00:22
Not buying. It’s a rock.
May 16, 2019 at 11:01
I’m not able to do that.
May 16, 2019 at 09:37
Meaning, the argument is unprovable.
May 16, 2019 at 08:22
I choose not to attempt to refute that.
May 16, 2019 at 08:22
So, not determined.
May 16, 2019 at 08:18
But I decided to take up the argument, of my own free will. I could just as easily have not done so. So if my participation is by my own choice, and h...
May 16, 2019 at 08:18
And how does this resolve the dilemma that I have posed?
May 16, 2019 at 06:49
I will try again. My argument is that if one's beliefs and actions are determined by external causes, whether biological or other, then one cannot cla...
May 16, 2019 at 06:45
I guess it requires reading Sickness Unto Death, which I will admit, I'm probably not going to do, so I will bow out at this point.
May 16, 2019 at 00:11
But in the Christian view, Christ's sacrifice put an end to all sacrifice, as it was the ultimate sacrifice - God sacrificing his own son. Hence the i...
May 16, 2019 at 00:01
I often reflect that we don't fully appreciate the setting of that story, which was ancient tribal culture in which sacrifice was integral. It was a u...
May 15, 2019 at 23:50
schopenhauer at least sees light at the end of the tunnel, in terms of askesis, and also art. But Camus https://gifimage.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/0...
May 15, 2019 at 22:51
:lol: That is just too funny - believing Trump has a philosophy, or expertise. 'Malevolence foiled by incompetence'.
May 15, 2019 at 21:32
But we still validate all of those discoveries against experience. That is what experiment and observation does, after all; you predict what will happ...
May 15, 2019 at 21:29
I made an argument, which you so far have given no indication of having understood. That doesn’t follow at all. There are many ideas which could never...
May 15, 2019 at 21:16
No, it changes as a consequence of physical force, not as a consequence of persuasion. Because you're a rational being, able to be persuaded. Objects ...
May 15, 2019 at 11:07
What’s that got to do with it? A computer is a device built by humans, to compute. It does so very well. Furthermore a computer doesn’t ‘agree’ except...
May 15, 2019 at 10:38
That’s LaPlace’s daemon, right? Well, the problem there is Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle torpedoes it. Reality is in some fundamental sense indet...
May 15, 2019 at 10:20
The OP :roll:
May 15, 2019 at 07:37
Remember Hume was 'enquiring into the foundations of human understanding'. He accepted that it is possible to know deductive proofs with certainty, th...
May 15, 2019 at 04:41
Slate: Trump's Tariffs are actually a Huge Tax Hike Of course, to the base, it doesn't matter. We all know the GOP hates and would never approve raisi...
May 15, 2019 at 04:22
That's even more mistaken. At least biology recognises that living creatures are ontologically distinct from billiard balls. And sure, if you drop a h...
May 14, 2019 at 23:00
It really seems that Trump is convinced the Mueller Report was an illegal conspiracy, intended to bring him down, and was basically a coup attempt. As...
May 14, 2019 at 21:50
Because if your beliefs are determined by biology, then you are not amenable to persuasion. If I persuade you that you are indeed acting on the basis ...
May 14, 2019 at 20:31
Yeah but taking income off farmers is going to hurt the base a lot more than taking money off the Pentagon to build the Wall.
May 14, 2019 at 09:25
Democrats could point out that tariffs are actually taxes and that what it really means is that Trump is raising taxes. There’s no greater poison for ...
May 14, 2019 at 07:34
Trump’s senior economic advisor contradicts him on ‘who pays’. It’s not that different to insisting that ‘Mexico would pay for the wall’.
May 14, 2019 at 06:35
That may be true, but it's beside the point.
May 14, 2019 at 05:50
Because deities and ducks belong to different orders of being?
May 14, 2019 at 03:41
In which case, what’s the point of responding? Because no matter what I say, you’re not amenable to reason; you’re only ever going to respond accordin...
May 14, 2019 at 02:30
My first question to you is, did you write this of your own free will, or were you compelled to say it? If the former, your thesis fails; if the latte...
May 14, 2019 at 01:12
It never hurts to state the obvious when the stakes are so high.
May 14, 2019 at 00:17
It is entirely true, Wallows. It might indeed 'hurt China', it might do what tariffs are supposed to do, it might even be a desirable thing, but China...
May 14, 2019 at 00:11
China does not pay the tariffs - the receiving country pays them. All that said, I have read the Dems are in support of tariffs and reining China in. ...
May 14, 2019 at 00:01