You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Wayfarer

Comments

Right! That helps a lot. I noticed your impassioned response against my purported ‘subjectivism’ in one of our recent exchanges. But I stand by it. Mi...
February 12, 2021 at 07:37
Well I wouldn’t shed a tier over it.
February 12, 2021 at 07:15
If I understood that comment, I’d probably criticize it.
February 12, 2021 at 06:41
I did try to draw a parallel between Wittgenstein’s apophatic silence, and Buddhism, in an earlier post - I’m curious as to why this elicited no comme...
February 12, 2021 at 03:33
Oh I see, I missed that, thanks for the explanation.
February 11, 2021 at 22:33
what's infinitely depressing are the lawyers and politicians who continue to support Trump, and the voters who still believe him, even after all this....
February 11, 2021 at 22:07
well that’s the whole point - conviction requires a super-majority, which means in this house, 17 Republicans voting to convict (in addition to the De...
February 11, 2021 at 10:56
Agree. Mind you I don’t want to fall for sloppy relativism either. In Buddhism there are plenty of rules, it’s not at all ‘anything goes’. But that is...
February 11, 2021 at 10:52
Of course it does. The whole point about physical determinism, is that the rules which govern the motions of atoms govern all else. It is a lineage th...
February 11, 2021 at 10:31
No, the State branches, the Republican Party organisation right across the country. Nothing to do with that Pillow idiot. Trump IS the defacto leader ...
February 11, 2021 at 09:48
He has many minions throughout the party organisation who will happily kneecap anyone who speaks against him. I agree with you that he’s finished, but...
February 11, 2021 at 07:48
:sweat:
February 11, 2021 at 07:24
Even though the evidence against Trump is utterly irrefutable, smoking-gun, no possibility of misinterpretation, it seems like the Republican Senators...
February 11, 2021 at 04:29
I’ve also experienced being passed over in silence.....
February 11, 2021 at 02:50
I find there are generally two kinds of reactions to the suggestion of anything supernatural: shocked rejection, on the one hand (the most common reac...
February 11, 2021 at 00:59
When being immolated, there is some period of time, perhaps many seconds, of continued awareness and presumably awareness of pain. The fact that this ...
February 11, 2021 at 00:35
Sure. But I still don’t see why the possibility of cessation is a consideration. Descartes never set out to prove the immortality of the soul, only an...
February 11, 2021 at 00:32
As I said, there are passages in the early Buddhist texts where the Buddha specifically forbids any monk from using such powers for profit or gain, wh...
February 10, 2021 at 23:48
Of course, no argument from me there. But the picture of the monk self-immolating was hardly 'frivilous', I'm sure you would agree. That was the conte...
February 10, 2021 at 23:45
:ok: 'In the beginner's mind, there are many possibilities. In the expert's mind, there are few' ~ Shunryu Suzuki, in Zen Mind, Beginner's Mind.
February 10, 2021 at 23:39
As I said to Gnomon, it cuts against the grain. Sensible folks don’t believe in magic. But Buddhism has been rife with magic from the outset, and bear...
February 10, 2021 at 22:48
From time to time, a comparision is made between Wittgenstein's aphorism of the ladder - that his philosophy is something you can discard when you hav...
February 10, 2021 at 21:51
Contingent upon his existing, for sure.
February 10, 2021 at 21:09
Of course. It is a cultural taboo, and such purported powers are obviously ripe for explotiation. In fact there's a rule in Buddhist orders right back...
February 10, 2021 at 20:49
the point is, they’re the same for all who think, and they can be used to encode ideas which are universally applicable. So, they’re real. But they do...
February 10, 2021 at 08:53
Perfectly true - but only a rational mind can see it.
February 10, 2021 at 08:17
Hey there’s a really good current essay on this subject....quick google....here, I’ve been meaning to start a thread on it, perhaps I will, it’s a bit...
February 10, 2021 at 07:29
There’s a pattern here. Recall the other day, you were arguing that hot and cold are on a continuum, and so couldn’t really be considered opposites. H...
February 10, 2021 at 07:04
Fair enough, and of course I agree, but the point was that there is no need to prove such simple facts. And I’m a Platonic realist about numbers, so I...
February 10, 2021 at 06:40
do you know the meaning of 'siddhi'? They are the super-normal powers which yogis are supposed to attain through the perfection of dhyana. (I suppose ...
February 10, 2021 at 03:36
Yes, Einstein took into account observations, and relied heavily on thought experiments. But he had no data for many of the predictions that were made...
February 10, 2021 at 02:01
Furthermore, nothing Einstein said invalidated Newton. It simply showed that Newtonian laws have a limited range of applicability.
February 10, 2021 at 00:56
It really doesn’t have any bearing on the discussion. Einstein relied wholly and solely on reason to establish principles which couldn’t even be verif...
February 10, 2021 at 00:43
Not at all facetious, but the point is, it's true in principle. How could a world hold together where less was greater than more? Empiricism has its l...
February 09, 2021 at 23:42
A distinction can still be made between necesssary and contingent, without referring to the "divine". Arithmetical proofs, for example, are true in al...
February 09, 2021 at 22:46
Modern people sometimes say that the Buddha acted selfishly by abandoning his home and family. I think the response to that is that, first, his family...
February 09, 2021 at 22:13
I don't know about that. Descartes was well aware of the concept of necessary truths, or a priori truths. Typical amongst these are the truths of reas...
February 09, 2021 at 21:20
I see. Of course that is true, but I'm still failing to see its relevance to what Descartes sought to demonstrate. He wasn't attempting to argue for t...
February 09, 2021 at 20:54
LaPlace's style of physical determinism was torpedoed by the uncertainty principle. That’s the short version.
February 09, 2021 at 09:15
Perhaps you might say a few more words about ‘contingency’. You say that Descartes should have said, ‘I must be thinking contingently.’ Contingent upo...
February 09, 2021 at 07:47
Kenny actually makes the point about poetry. I would agree, so long as it’s not prefaced with ‘mere’. :-)
February 09, 2021 at 07:27
Yes, you’re correct, I completely fail to see the point of the OP.
February 09, 2021 at 04:34
Incidentally, St Augustine articulated a clear pre-cursor to Descartes, centuries previously:
February 09, 2021 at 02:00
However, with the 'complete cessation' - presumably either death, or perhaps through entering a trance, or perhaps anaesthesia - then indeed there is ...
February 09, 2021 at 01:53
Nirv??a does mean something like 'extinction' but a more philosophically sensitive intepretation is the 'extinction of suffering'. This also implies o...
February 09, 2021 at 00:43
Naturalism excludes God as a matter of principle. The mistake is to then believe that science has disproved the substance of such a belief, when in pr...
February 09, 2021 at 00:38
Maybe entertaining, or edifying, but doesn’t count for knowledge, though. I think here there’s a lesson lurking under the surface, but I’ve done all I...
February 08, 2021 at 08:59
why ‘clinging’? What do you think is motivating that?
February 08, 2021 at 08:18
‘If only thoughts were reducible to maths! Then I wouldn’t have this problem.’
February 08, 2021 at 07:55
Whoa. (And welcome). Very sketchy introduction. But what I make of it is that the word 'final' is key. 'Final' means 'something which all must agree o...
February 08, 2021 at 07:33