You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Wayfarer

Comments

Right. Cynics say that McConnell was having a bet each way - not voting for impeachment so as not to antagonise the Trump base, but then declaring Tru...
February 16, 2021 at 05:26
I figured you might. That's why I mentioned Dennett. But it's not specific to him - it's a general observation. I've just learned an interesting phras...
February 16, 2021 at 02:48
Never argue with trumpworld inhabitants. As they're beyond reason, trying to reason with them is futile. This has been proved a million times.
February 16, 2021 at 01:01
:up: I notice you do explicitly mention 'scientism' in that option. Also I was going to suggest that 'normative' might be a better term than 'prescrip...
February 16, 2021 at 01:00
‘And then you bring in all these things I hadn’t thought of and writers I haven’t heard about which criticises this view. How condescending! You’re ju...
February 16, 2021 at 00:41
It is not condescending to point out that this is an insufficient basis for resolution of the question posed by the OP.
February 16, 2021 at 00:12
welll, more than personal - it can be social, a widely-held view that an individual also accepts.
February 15, 2021 at 23:57
Have a look at that top essay, by Richard Polt, lays it out far better than I could. (From a tenured professor of philosophy, by the way.)
February 15, 2021 at 23:40
Anyone else notice that Mitch McConnell's speech, directly after the acquittal, saying that it was undeniable that Trump was responsible for incitemen...
February 15, 2021 at 23:39
I'd go along with that. Have a geez at: Anything but Human, Richard Polt, New York Times. It ain't Necessarily So, Anthony Gottlieb, New Yorker.
February 15, 2021 at 23:34
That is simply a paraphrase of: Isn't it? Did I read it wrong? I'm generally critical of the way that biological evolution has become a 'theory of eve...
February 15, 2021 at 23:27
Obviously you don't understand my criticisms, but I assure you, they are not made in bad faith. In every interchange, I'm making an effort to explain ...
February 15, 2021 at 23:16
The problem with that, again, is that if the 'biological determines the intellectual', then it undermines the sovereignty of reason. If reason depends...
February 15, 2021 at 22:36
I think you're missing the option 'one domain viewed from different perspectives'.
February 15, 2021 at 22:19
totally irrelevant to the scientific study of psi.
February 15, 2021 at 08:20
Parapsychology research does depend on demonstrating odds of greater-than-chance over trials using various mechanisms, like cards with symbols on them...
February 15, 2021 at 06:31
:up: Agree. Descartes was the first author I studied in philosophy, under the heading The First Modern Philosopher.
February 15, 2021 at 01:02
Meaning what, exactly? There is no single authoritative source or oracle by the name of 'science'. Science is multi-faceted, always evolving. I think ...
February 14, 2021 at 23:32
'What it means' is that humans can contemplate 'what if....'; they can undertake different courses of action; they can consider the outcome of those c...
February 14, 2021 at 23:12
Right - but that can only ever amount to either utilitarianism or pragmatism. And 'intellectual' is in a different category. If you're a predator, you...
February 14, 2021 at 22:26
that's an opinion piece from Tom Toole, the WP's editorial cartoonist. It points out that Clinton had won the popular vote and Trump's overal margin w...
February 14, 2021 at 22:09
:up: That's an interesting idea. The problem with Darwinism as an ethos, is that there is no inherent purpose other than propogation. Due to the histo...
February 14, 2021 at 21:46
And once again the political finesse/stinking hypocrisy of McConnell is on full display. Gives a damning speech, more or less fessing up that ‘Trump d...
February 14, 2021 at 06:17
https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-gop-just-spit-in-the-face-of-american-democracy-by-acquitting-trump-at-his-second-impeachment-trial?ref=home https:/...
February 14, 2021 at 05:21
No obvious warrant, or short-term reward. But Christians will talk in terms of their 'heavenly reward'. There's a rationale behind religion, even if i...
February 14, 2021 at 04:23
Tosh. It’s fundamental. You can’t even talk about a warrant without considering what it is for.
February 14, 2021 at 04:06
I'm saying, there's a strong presumption of religious belief being unwarranted. So I'm trying to focus on the question, what would warrant it? I suppo...
February 14, 2021 at 03:25
When I said 'of course it does', I meant 'Heisenberg's discovery of uncertainty tends to undermine the causal determinism that is implied LaPlace's 'd...
February 14, 2021 at 03:18
The question I raised is, what would be the warrant for religious belief? What makes it different from belief in Russell's orbiting teapot, or the fly...
February 14, 2021 at 02:12
No, that's your issue. That's what you believe.
February 14, 2021 at 01:51
And, for that matter, what would warrant religous belief? What's on offer? If it turned out to be a good bet, what would the winnings look like?
February 14, 2021 at 01:46
What does 'evidence' consist of, in this context? You see, typically, we will start with the presumption that the sacred texts of the religious tradit...
February 14, 2021 at 01:40
Anyway, as predicted, the GOP Senate has clearly demonstrated once again the fact that it's been taken over by Trump, with the notable exception of th...
February 13, 2021 at 23:21
Agree. Wittgenstein's Forgotten Lesson I agree that Wittgenstein never crossed paths with Buddhism but there are clear parallels. I would characterise...
February 13, 2021 at 22:29
Buddhism practices the opposite of schadenfreude, namely, mudita, sympathetic joy at the fortune or well-being of others.
February 13, 2021 at 19:39
well, as you have no interest in philosophy, I can only conclude you’re trolling. So long.
February 13, 2021 at 10:02
From my perspective, you don’t understand what I’m talking about, whilst I think I have at least an inkling of your point. In any case, please don’t l...
February 13, 2021 at 06:50
Well, that’s an interesting reading, as I say. I will think about that one.
February 13, 2021 at 03:43
‘Subjectivism’ being.....?
February 13, 2021 at 03:37
I know it's a big topic. Before this thread, were you aware of Thomas Nagel and the subjects he writes about? Have you read philosophy of science? Kuh...
February 13, 2021 at 03:23
Is that so? I didn't realise Descartes was cowed by the thought of upsetting religious authority. But I also fail to see the relevance to the philosop...
February 13, 2021 at 02:41
Yes, religions often lead to evil, but saying that religion is intrinsically evil, like Dawkins does, is another thing altogether. I think for a lot o...
February 13, 2021 at 00:53
The point is that in Trumpworld, facts don’t matter. The fact that Trump is obviously guilty has no bearing on the outcome of the trial. Nothing that ...
February 13, 2021 at 00:38
Don't know why you bothered to start this thread, you've clearly got no real interest in the subject matter.
February 12, 2021 at 23:53
The fact that the Republicans are likely to acquit is almost more disgusting than Trump’s behaviour. Although I suppose you have to make allowances fo...
February 12, 2021 at 23:41
Tychism (Greek: ????, lit. 'chance') is a thesis proposed by the American philosopher Charles Sanders Peirce that holds that absolute chance, or indet...
February 12, 2021 at 23:19
I’ve never encountered this reading of history before. The orthodox account is that Cartesian algebraic geometry was a crucial foundation for the ‘new...
February 12, 2021 at 21:19
This post on ‘the silence of the Buddha’ and whether it is comparable in principle to Wittgenstein’s aphorism.
February 12, 2021 at 20:59
Funny, I thought it said ‘scientist’. Silly me!
February 12, 2021 at 09:53
So what is it really? ‘Blind spot? What do you mean, ‘blind spot?’
February 12, 2021 at 09:49