You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Wayfarer

Comments

I admire that (although I just bought a car.) But I also gloomily realise the truth of the old maxim about the patterns being set in early childhood, ...
May 14, 2024 at 05:36
I wonder if that shows up here:
May 14, 2024 at 04:11
‘Hiding behind Wittgenstein’s skirts’, as one of our illustrious contributors once quipped.
May 14, 2024 at 03:50
Make the case, then.
May 14, 2024 at 03:19
Logic was codified by Aristotle and his successors in the context of an assumed ontology and metaphysics which was to become an integral part of the C...
May 14, 2024 at 01:50
*
May 14, 2024 at 01:19
What has really changed between ancient philosophy and our own day is due to the advent of modernity and the ascendancy of individualism. It is, in ph...
May 14, 2024 at 01:01
Transcendent yet immanent. Something the 'new atheists' could never comprehend. Have a look at The Theological Origins of Modernity, Michael Allen Gil...
May 13, 2024 at 23:55
It may not be an exact quote but the book I mentioned says which is pretty well exactly what I said. There's another account of the same idea on the t...
May 13, 2024 at 08:42
My take is - and this is another digression, but what the heck - there is no electron until it is measured. Until it is measured, what exists is a dis...
May 13, 2024 at 08:03
Good to know. I started with 3.5 but upgraded to the paid version a few months later. I don’t really have a justification for the subscription - it’s ...
May 13, 2024 at 07:47
Don’t confuse apathy Stoic ‘apathia’ with mere indifference or ennui. It’s more like the ability to rise above personal emotions and pettiness. I thin...
May 13, 2024 at 07:22
as you probably know Bernardo Kastrup has published a book on him, Decoding Schopenhauer's Metaphysics, which compares his ideas favourably which thos...
May 13, 2024 at 06:39
'Reflecting on the general nature of experience' is an empiricist argument, but it is something that already requires the capacity for judgement. John...
May 13, 2024 at 05:36
I don't agree, although I also don't think it's of particular relevance. I agree that some experiments and observations demonstrate a kind of 'proto-r...
May 13, 2024 at 03:24
Tell me, then, exactly where this goes wrong:
May 13, 2024 at 02:41
The fact that you think all the sources I cite are mistaken, would be a major one. I can tolerate disagreement, but not pointless arguments, of which ...
May 13, 2024 at 02:31
I have provided references to many other sources, including, in this instance, Frege, Russell, Nagel, and Advaita Vendanta. I believe that I make a co...
May 13, 2024 at 02:11
Yes I think I'd go along with that. I think Plato would recognise it as the initial stirrings of anamnesis.
May 13, 2024 at 02:02
Yes. There's also the passage which I've quoted to you and elsewhere on this forum: Notice from the SEP entry on Schopenhauer: So, important to regist...
May 13, 2024 at 01:42
Unfortunately I don't have the rhetorical skills to fend of such exalted polemics. And, as always, you declare what you yourself don't understand as t...
May 13, 2024 at 01:36
I am interested in discussing ontology. By the way I checked in with ChatGPT about the relevance of quantifier variability, which produced some useful...
May 13, 2024 at 01:34
As I also noted somewhere in this thread, I am using the term slightly differently to Kant. Some points from the wiki article on noumenon: However, th...
May 13, 2024 at 00:07
Obviously a very meaty paper, I have found it and will peruse it later. My initial response is simply that I never deny the fact of objectivity or fac...
May 12, 2024 at 22:03
That it’s the kind of thing a Parmenides would say? Not two kinds but two levels, phenomenal and noumenal - and the role of the mind in synthesizing t...
May 12, 2024 at 11:51
:up: Alan Watts is well worth reading. He has had new generations of readers since his death.
May 12, 2024 at 05:27
Machines are artefacts, are they not? I'd be interested in your take on this paper I often cite, Frege on Knowing the Third Realm, Tyler Burge - about...
May 12, 2024 at 02:25
You always argue from an unquestioned empiricism and can’t see how anything that challenges that can ‘make sense’ in your terms. There are things you ...
May 12, 2024 at 01:10
I would like to believe that this position is nearer to Kant’s transcendental idealism. There’s no way I posit anything like Descartes ‘res cogitans’ ...
May 12, 2024 at 01:08
I presented the argument here https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/902998 which was somehow misconstrued as Cartesian dualism, although w...
May 12, 2024 at 00:29
:ok: From an essay on the issue: Actually I think there’s a sensible answer to that question, which is that empiricism is tremendously effective at fi...
May 12, 2024 at 00:17
That's not my claim. It is in the article that I referred to, The Indispensability Argument in the Philosophy of Mathematics. That article says that m...
May 11, 2024 at 23:50
I've learned that the dissident theological movement, Radical Orthodoxy, sees Duns Scotus' univocity (in combination with Ockham's nominalism) as the ...
May 11, 2024 at 23:09
What I see is only that the causal sequence that gave rise to life and mind didn’t commence with the formation of earth, or the formation of stars. Bu...
May 11, 2024 at 22:09
Only in your misreading of them. A perceptive reader would notice a much closer resemblance to form-matter dualism which is quite a different thing to...
May 11, 2024 at 09:47
Nothing whatever to do with Cartesian dualism, which never made any such distinction. //but thank you all the same//
May 11, 2024 at 07:23
It is well known that the 'four noble truths' of Buddhism begin with the observation or axiom that life is suffering - the Buddhist term is 'dukkha' w...
May 11, 2024 at 03:30
You might be pleased to learn that the inestimable value of each human life was a foundational principle of the great philosopher Immanuel Kant. He ar...
May 11, 2024 at 03:19
Thanks for that, we have some agreement. Maybe to you the issue I'm commenting on 'goes without saying' but I think there's something that needs to be...
May 10, 2024 at 23:51
It was never intended to, but it’s occupied the space left by the collapse of creation mythologies.
May 10, 2024 at 22:09
I’m not arguing in favor of it. I’m asking why it’s even necessary. I’m questioning the claim that ‘according to our best epistemic theories, mathemat...
May 10, 2024 at 10:45
Indeed you are. I will reply later, dealing with domestic duties today. Take it aside and explain to it the meaning of ‘prime number’.
May 10, 2024 at 07:30
And Lloyd Gerson lays out the thesis, in Platonism and Naturalism: The Possibility of Philosophy, that (1) philosophy proper is Platonist, and (2) is ...
May 10, 2024 at 02:03
How am I defending it? I’ll come back to this later.
May 10, 2024 at 01:38
Do you agree or disagree that mathematical knowledge is incompatible with ‘our best epidemic theories?’ That is the point on which the argument hinges...
May 10, 2024 at 00:40
Fair enough - but it’s not ‘my article’, it’s an encyclopedia article on a genuine controversy. Why it’s a controversy, and what the implications are,...
May 09, 2024 at 22:44
Phenomena - apparent, appearing Noumenal - object of nous/intellect Imaginary - fictional and literary
May 09, 2024 at 22:26
Really? Where do I sell? In any case, once it's posted, it's published, to all intents and purposes, in that anyone can read the posts here, even if o...
May 09, 2024 at 07:51
That they have a common reference, that the value of a number is not a matter of opinion or choice. I would like to say 'objective' but I don't think ...
May 09, 2024 at 06:03