So even if I clarify what I mean on the specific terms I use, you will still insist on reading them at face value? Maybe it is, but even so, I am stil...
Most likely that we're talking past each other, but I have tried to clarify what I meant by both sentences so what the terms I use mean normally in En...
Can you clarify further what "the only thing I ever experience is sitting at my computer"? Sorry, I am still trying to make sure you mean what I think...
Sorry, but I am afraid I still have no idea where you derive your contradiction from, and am probably as confused as you are. Maybe I haven't taken en...
That was an example to make things easier to understand. That was not my view or built into my P3. I am willing to initially assume in my OP that our ...
Well, what you were asking about happens to be the presentist position (and no, I am not saying here it is my position, in case you were wondering). T...
Let's just assume a presentist world again. There is nothing contradictory in saying the following: - My experience during the entire time I exist (wh...
What could possibly not be clear about it? If my doctor asks me if I am in pain, I find myself not to be in pain at all, and I tell him I am not. Woul...
For the last time no. If I just said that I am the temporal worm, the temporal worm that I said should have an experience of 2010 as a result of it be...
- Let's say that the entire duration in which I exist is limited to an instant. During that time, I am only sitting in my room and looking at my compu...
Huh? Of course I am not saying that the sorts of things I experience is limited to sitting in a computer, if by that you mean the types of experience ...
Under the worm theory, I am the entity that identifies with the entire worm. There is no other entity I can be. I said that they were inconsistencies ...
When I was using the term "now", I was mainly referring to the temporal manner in which we frame our experience. Earlier, you mentioned that our exper...
Again, I never made the statement that the 2010 joys are had by the 2017 temporal part. In fact, I have tried to make that point clear in my OP. I thi...
I can grant that. "Here" would refer to the spatio-temporal location of the utterance event (or alternatively the speaker of that utterance as I have ...
So much as I have disagreed with you, it had more to do with the restricted definition of what you want "now" to mean. What I have insisted is not tru...
Like? Certainly my experience of being in my room describes a complex set of experiences. My visual experience of me of the computer screen in front o...
Just as much as for any bank account, I own only the money in that account. But that doesn't stop me from owning all the money in every account simply...
I am not saying that you cannot (in face, P2. explicitly states that you must have them). I am just saying that you do not have them (or maybe you do,...
Maybe I don't understand indexicals well enough, but even if we were to assume that there was a present tense that attaches itself to my claims, I sti...
I'm in a rush right now, but I just want to say that the worm theory is an eternalist theory. The notions of "experienced", "will" and "present-tense"...
There's more to it than that actually. If an experience is had as part of a larger experience, then I believe that this fact should figure into the co...
It's easy for someone to claim that you experiencing all of your times, but do you really find yourself having all of them? I can claim that you are i...
I disagree. The claim that I am having an experience of sitting in my room only is simply inconsistent with the claim that I am also having another ex...
I think you are misinterpreting what I mean in my P3 since you seem to be emphasizing the fact that I am only having an experience "at a given time". ...
Hello and thank you for welcoming me. It seems that this type of response collapses to the stage theory does it not? Cause if we are going to grant th...
I am not saying that every part is identical to every other part, or that it is a requirement for composite objects. Certainly such a view would be cl...
Comments