You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

T_Clark

Comments

It's not a mistake and your response is disingenuous. There is no freedom of speech beyond what protections government or other institutions provide. ...
September 19, 2024 at 20:25
No, slander shouldn't be illegal. As I noted in my response to @"NOS4A2", slander is not a crime in the US, which makes sense to me.
September 19, 2024 at 19:14
Whenever this subject comes up, someone points out that freedom of speech, the First Amendment here in the US, only applies to government action. It d...
September 19, 2024 at 19:12
The philosopher I feel most at home with is Lao Tzu, who wrote "The Tao Te Ching," one of the founding documents of Taoism. As the first verse says "T...
September 19, 2024 at 14:39
I think we've carried this issue as far as we're going to get.
September 19, 2024 at 00:19
As I indicated previously, I appreciate the sentiment. It means a lot to me.
September 19, 2024 at 00:18
You're new to the forum, so maybe you don't know how rare that kind of acknowledgment is. I appreciate it.
September 18, 2024 at 18:20
In the first example, forcing someone to make a decision doesn't force them to make a neutral one. As for slaves and convicted criminals, there are no...
September 18, 2024 at 18:16
I disagree. Have you ever read a judges decision in a court case. Just look at recent events in the Supreme Court in the US. How could nine judges com...
September 18, 2024 at 18:08
How is the person forced? By threats? How could such a decision be neutral?
September 18, 2024 at 18:03
Although this is true, it's not what I've been trying to explain. I thought I expressed myself clearly, perhaps not. To go any further I'm just going ...
September 18, 2024 at 17:45
I don't think there is a misunderstanding, just a disagreement. What is ethical is a personal value. Even an understanding that it is necessary to con...
September 18, 2024 at 17:28
Again, I can't think of an example of a decision that can be made without values. When I was an engineer, the first question in any decision making fo...
September 18, 2024 at 17:14
What you're describing is not consistent with what is known about human decision making. Emotions and values are an integral part of thinking and deci...
September 18, 2024 at 16:53
I’m God. If I say it’s four, it’s four.
September 17, 2024 at 16:47
Do you know who Dr. Phil is? He's pure evil. No. You're thinking of Franco.
September 17, 2024 at 14:47
Four things 1) I would be omnipotent 2) I would be omniscient 3) 4) I wouldn't care what you thought or wanted.
September 17, 2024 at 14:43
Careful, don't piss God off. Maybe I'll send them to Spain instead. You know what? I'm definitely going to send Dr. Phil to Spain.
September 16, 2024 at 20:25
Not necessarily in higher regard, but the most vulnerable are due the greatest protection. I'm God, for God's sake. Don't pester me with details and l...
September 16, 2024 at 20:20
I'd send anyone who intentionally killed, tortured, seriously hurt, or abused a child to North Korea permanently. Oh, and Dr. Phil too.
September 16, 2024 at 17:16
I have a strong intuition (wishful thinking?) there is an innate human nature. As I have always seen it, innate language is the strongest instance of ...
September 16, 2024 at 16:56
This is true I don't disagree with this. I like to think I'm open minded, but I find the evidence for the innate nature of language convincing. I also...
September 15, 2024 at 18:59
Evidence from psychological and cognitive science studies indicates this is not true. Language, including grammar and naming is a genetically inherite...
September 15, 2024 at 04:10
No
September 14, 2024 at 20:56
It is my understanding that it is an inherent human tendency to personify aspects of our world. Babies are instinctively responsive to human faces and...
September 14, 2024 at 15:59
I disagree strongly. You clearly have no interest in serious philosophy. Then again, the Shoutbox is specifically intended for pettifogging.
September 14, 2024 at 15:42
Apokrisis has written a lot about biosemiotics and, based on his recommendations, I've read a couple of articles. I must admit I've never have been ab...
September 14, 2024 at 15:38
Here is my response to a similar claim you made in the "God" discussion.
September 13, 2024 at 03:45
Have you looked at the scientific discussion of abiogenesis? It's just one more of the questions for which there are hypotheses but no accepted theory...
September 13, 2024 at 03:42
Have you ever read a Spanish book and also the English translation? If so, what was the experience like? Did the translation get the original right?
September 12, 2024 at 16:25
I've always been intrigued by translation. I wonder about the difference of your experiences reading it in Spanish as opposed to English.
September 12, 2024 at 15:49
Lao Tzu (Laozi) is not punk. He's cookies and milk sitting by the fire.
September 12, 2024 at 15:44
I'm a fan of "Who cares."
September 12, 2024 at 00:03
Once you've gotten past the silly, creaky "why is there something rather than nothing" question, the universe can't be an "accident." It's inevitable....
September 12, 2024 at 00:02
I like the way you've formulated this issue - judging a choice of perspective based on usefulness. For me, that's the heart of the matter.
September 11, 2024 at 01:24
Collingwood has a much different take on metaphysics than Aristotle and Quine. Be that as it may, there's no reason for you to read it if it's not up ...
September 10, 2024 at 15:49
Yes, I think that's exactly right. In my experience you can't nest a quote within a quote on the forum. Maybe someone else knows how to do it.
September 10, 2024 at 03:11
Oh, wait. I guess I didn't answer your question... Did I mention that's a good question?
September 09, 2024 at 16:35
Good question... We argue about that kind of thing here all the time. I'll take a swing at it - the mind is a non-physical manifestation of a physical...
September 09, 2024 at 16:34
I don't consider myself a Kantian and I can use those of his ideas I find valuable without having to accept everything he says. As Lorenz wrote in the...
September 09, 2024 at 16:29
I agree, although I think in the context of this discussion, the difference is important.
September 09, 2024 at 16:04
Why do you say that? Isn't truth a metaphysical concept?
September 09, 2024 at 16:03
I don't understand the logic of this. Of course a relativistic position is relativistic. Not all self-reference is self-contradictory. 180 Proof, I kn...
September 09, 2024 at 02:40
I think you're stretching the meaning of the word "relativism" here. "Universe" means everything. We only have access to this scope of being, dimensio...
September 09, 2024 at 02:34
I'm with Kant on this. A broader perspective recognizes the nature and extent of a priori knowledge applies to more than just space and time. Percepti...
September 09, 2024 at 02:29
It's not clear to me that "relativism" and "subjectivism" mean the same thing, e.g. Catholic Church doctrine is that abortion is absolutely wrong, but...
September 09, 2024 at 01:52
Welcome to the forum. A well-written and well thought out OP (original post). To start... If you hang around you'll see that my arguments very often c...
September 08, 2024 at 17:47
Europeans have their own extensive and continuing history of colonialism and exploitation.
September 08, 2024 at 14:18
Sometimes people say things like this so they won't have to take responsibility for social conditions in the society where they live. Edited
September 07, 2024 at 18:59
Good to know.
September 07, 2024 at 18:55