You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

T_Clark

Comments

Something similar - when I lived in Cambridge Massachusetts, the street lights were very tall and in the summer you could see nighthawks catching bugs...
July 24, 2025 at 02:52
Oops! Sorry. How about this instead? Flight of the Conchords is not funny.
July 24, 2025 at 02:06
Now I have to say something mean to you too. How about this… Fucking Kiwis
July 24, 2025 at 02:04
You are welcome to talk about it. I wasn't suggesting your thread not be allowed. It would just make more sense if you would discuss troubles in your ...
July 23, 2025 at 21:30
Here's a brief summary of what I think you've written. Tell me if I got it wrong. Rich people and poor people are socially equal because, while rich p...
July 23, 2025 at 21:19
Some thoughts. It annoys me you feel the need to step into this. As you note, it's a problem in the US, but not in most of Europe. Why do you feel the...
July 23, 2025 at 21:07
I’m a white, liberal, registered Democrat, but I recognize what you’re calling “woke” for what it really is. It’s a way for “progressives” to show the...
July 23, 2025 at 20:05
I knew I could count on you. Thanks.
July 22, 2025 at 17:13
It also makes a good first line for a haiku, or whatever those haikus that aren’t really haikus are called. Hey, Javi , what’s the right word?
July 22, 2025 at 00:52
Oh, Banno… you’re so cute.
July 22, 2025 at 00:42
Yes, that’s how I see it. Not really. I’ve heard his name here and there on the forum, but I don’t really know what his beliefs were. Are speed, dista...
July 21, 2025 at 23:20
It is exactly that easy I declare it metaphysical for two reasons. First, because it is. Second, because if I treated it as if it were supposed to be ...
July 21, 2025 at 23:06
This is a great response. @"Wayfarer", @"Metaphysician Undercover", @"boundless", and I will all be able to say "See, Apokrisis agrees with me." A lot...
July 21, 2025 at 18:52
True story.
July 21, 2025 at 16:41
For me also. There's no better way to understand what you believe than to bump up against something you don't believe. For what it's worth, I don't ca...
July 21, 2025 at 16:39
I have no problem with a religious point of view where God is the final cause giving the universe, the world, reality, or whatever you want to call it...
July 21, 2025 at 16:26
Umm... No, not as I see it. Isn't that the whole point of this discussion. The artillery officer, the war planners, and the politicians are all human....
July 21, 2025 at 16:15
That’s why I said I think it’s a bad analogy. As I said, I don’t really want to reopen this whole argument.
July 21, 2025 at 01:06
Be that as it may, I wasn’t trying to reopen the argument, I was trying to explain why I reject itso strongly.
July 21, 2025 at 00:55
I think it’s probably needless to say I don’t agree with this. A knife is designed and made by humans to cut. I think that is a bad analogy for the ki...
July 21, 2025 at 00:53
@"Wayfarer" @"Metaphysician Undercover" It struck me just now why I find the teleological approach to understanding the world so distasteful. It's dis...
July 21, 2025 at 00:21
It is also my understanding that Soylent Green is people.
July 20, 2025 at 22:14
I know you're old enough to know who Mikey is.
July 20, 2025 at 21:44
Mass is energy. Energy is mass. Your conception of what is real and what is not doesn't make much sense to me.
July 20, 2025 at 21:35
As I noted, you and I are just too far apart on this. I strongly disagree. We've been through this. The physicalism you seem to be talking about is th...
July 20, 2025 at 21:28
This is from Antonio Damasio's "Feeling & Knowing: Making Minds Conscious." Damasio is a well-known cognitive scientist.
July 20, 2025 at 21:23
Well, of course there has been. When you start at zero complexity, zero consciousness, the only place to go is up.
July 20, 2025 at 21:15
This seems like the whole infinite regress problem. A rock is moving with intention, but the intention came from outside it. Where did that intention ...
July 20, 2025 at 21:11
I wasn't trying to use your affection for Burtt as an argument against your position. It just struck me after reading @"Metaphysician Undercover"'s co...
July 20, 2025 at 21:02
I clearly haven't read nearly as much philosophy as you, so I can't compare philosophers. I will say I feel very at home with Collingwood, and not jus...
July 20, 2025 at 20:45
You’re older than I thought you were.
July 20, 2025 at 01:40
I guess you’re just lucky ChatGPT can’t call 911 directly. It’s my understanding that feature will be coming soon.
July 20, 2025 at 01:19
Maybe I’m a bit confused. Are you saying that it makes sense to think of non-sentient objects as capable of having intention? I think that is at the h...
July 20, 2025 at 01:17
I am always amazed at how brilliant a rhetorician you are.
July 20, 2025 at 00:43
I guess I mean it both ways. A question that can’t be answered either truly or falsely is either metaphysical or meaningless. Turning that around, a m...
July 20, 2025 at 00:42
There was a very, very bad and very, very wonderful movie back in the late 60s or early 70s called “Wild in the Streets”. In it, the voting age was re...
July 19, 2025 at 16:26
Yes, this is correct. It’s exactly the same. This is not a scientific way of speaking, it’s statistics. This is how statisticians talk about distribut...
July 19, 2025 at 16:13
In my original response to this post, I wrote there are trillions of molecules in a container of air. That’s not right. When we deal with thermodynami...
July 18, 2025 at 21:08
More of your rabid anti-religious bigotry. In this case especially lame.
July 18, 2025 at 18:06
You're making the idea that properties manifest as the number of elements approach infinity seem more exotic than it is. The term is just shorthand fo...
July 18, 2025 at 18:04
All this is exactly right. Strong emergence is not compatible with reductionism. That's the subject of the paper I linked. Perhaps I was confused. I t...
July 18, 2025 at 01:24
I did what I will admit was a quick scan and I didn’t see any answer to my specific request which was show me some evidence that “no amount of chemica...
July 17, 2025 at 01:54
I've had my say. I'll leave it at that.
July 17, 2025 at 01:03
No, life is reducible to chemistry, it's just that it is not constructable from chemistry. Says who? Show me some evidence. Give me some inkling of a ...
July 17, 2025 at 01:01
This really confused me. You say that weak emergence is the same thing as reductionism. I'm ok with that, although I don't think it's quite accurate. ...
July 17, 2025 at 00:49
I've already acknowledged that societal values and political considerations influence what is considered worth studying, knowing. And you're right - s...
July 17, 2025 at 00:34
It's true. The metaphysics of everyday life is different from that of science. Why would you expect anything different? Scientists are trying to do di...
July 16, 2025 at 17:47
The origin of life from inanimate material - abiogenesis - is not some mysterious unknowable process. It can be, and is, studied by science. It's not ...
July 16, 2025 at 17:00
It's true, life can't be explained using physics. The structure, development, and behavior of living organisms operate according to a different set of...
July 16, 2025 at 16:49
https://www.tonychachere.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/spanishrice690.png
July 16, 2025 at 15:33