You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

T_Clark

Comments

The funniest Wikipedia entry I’ve ever come across. Actually the only funny Wikipedia entry I’ve ever come across. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-...
September 28, 2025 at 16:45
Irony—the etymology of “etymology”
September 28, 2025 at 16:32
This is why we pragmatists rule the world.
September 28, 2025 at 16:20
I can never figure out what you mean when you talk about Peircean triads. Is it the degrees of freedom below, the constraints above, and the resulting...
September 28, 2025 at 01:16
If you can't thoroughly describe a system, you can't express it in terms of causes either. My point in this discussion is to show that causality is on...
September 28, 2025 at 01:08
You still haven’t answered my question. Would your decision to take the bet be rational?
September 27, 2025 at 21:01
Too late, you already took the bet. The question is was your decision rational? If you say no, it’s kind of hard to take your argument seriously. I do...
September 27, 2025 at 20:02
So let’s say you and I are sitting out on my front porch drinking whiskey sours. I live on a pretty busy road so cars are going by often. Let’s say ev...
September 27, 2025 at 19:15
It seems to me the reliance on memory you are talking about is rational. So, what’s the problem?
September 27, 2025 at 18:28
I’m a big fan of ordinary usage, but it comes into conflict with philosopher’s desire to make up new definitions and new words.
September 27, 2025 at 16:56
Off the top of my head, this makes sense to me, but I haven’t spent a lot of time thinking about intentional cause. I specifically left it out of this...
September 27, 2025 at 16:52
But isn’t that where diamonds come from?
September 27, 2025 at 16:34
Hume’s idea of legitimate belief is not irrational. If anything it’s non-rational. Very few of our beliefs are rational. Even fewer are irrational. Th...
September 27, 2025 at 16:32
Good post. As a registered Democrat here in the US, what you’ve written is in line with my criticism of the party. We’ve lost contact with our purpose...
September 27, 2025 at 04:01
Yes, the whole distinction between events that are intentional versus those that are not seems to complicate all of the discussions I’ve looked at. As...
September 27, 2025 at 01:34
None of this is true
September 26, 2025 at 21:57
It didn't say Freud discovered it. It said he recognized it. I also recognize it based on my own experience. I wouldn't have put it in my post otherwi...
September 26, 2025 at 21:44
I don't see the value in this kind of distinction. How do you see it?
September 26, 2025 at 21:42
Again, I didn't say the idea of causality is never useful, only that it's usefulness is limited. I tried to give examples of what I was talking about ...
September 26, 2025 at 21:39
That's what I was trying to do. I don't think I've been very successful.
September 26, 2025 at 21:32
Did you read all my posts? I'm guessing you didn't.
September 26, 2025 at 21:27
This is a great summary of the "blooming, buzzing confusion." Better than the one I've presented in the OP and my subsequent posts in this thread. Yes...
September 26, 2025 at 21:25
Yup, that’s how it works. From the web.
September 26, 2025 at 18:06
So, you can’t trust induction, so just act as if you can. After all, what else are you going to do? Seems kind of a cheat. It’s not rational, but it’s...
September 26, 2025 at 16:35
I posted this earlier in this thread. That’s why I don’t claim the idea of causality is useless in all situations.
September 25, 2025 at 23:17
In the OP and subsequent posts, I think I’ve made it reasonably clear what I’m talking about when I say “causality.” This is not true. Many do not.
September 25, 2025 at 19:24
I’ve come to the same sort of conclusion you have— looking at cause, efficient cause, is a question of the transfer of energy. That doesn’t change the...
September 25, 2025 at 15:09
I intentionally left out instances where a human motivation was involved because I wanted to avoid the complications associated with that. I think the...
September 25, 2025 at 04:33
I understand this, but I think it’s not a useful way of looking at things.
September 25, 2025 at 03:18
I’m not insulted at all. I was just making an observation. I think this post confirms my observation is correct.
September 25, 2025 at 03:15
Sure we can. You’re right that you don’t have access to everything. But then again, the kinds of subjects that philosophy covers tend to be associated...
September 25, 2025 at 03:12
Even I'm not sure the US is on the same planet as everyone else these days. It's clear from this thread I'm working on pulling my thoughts on this sub...
September 25, 2025 at 01:31
I see what you mean, but I tried to keep human intention out of the question. I can see I kind of slipped some in.
September 25, 2025 at 01:25
To tell the truth, I'm not really sure what @"apokrisis" means by "dichotomy" in this context.
September 25, 2025 at 01:20
Thank you. Do you consider the description of the salt marsh I discussed as a "toy case?" If so, I disagree. The question I've been asking is--if it i...
September 25, 2025 at 01:19
I looked up "propensity probability" on Wikipedia and it said this: That seems like a patch to me. A patch to cover the hole in the idea of causality ...
September 25, 2025 at 01:13
I'm not sure what you mean in this context. Previously I suggested just describing the conditions rather than attributing causality. Is that the same ...
September 25, 2025 at 01:06
This is the point I'm trying to make. What does it add to the discussion to talk about causality instead of just describing the "blooming, buzzing con...
September 25, 2025 at 01:01
In the OP I've given specific examples of situations where changes take place but it is not useful to use the term "causality." Many people here have ...
September 25, 2025 at 00:45
I was using Collingwood's definition of metaphysics, not specifically causality. My claim is that causality is a metaphysical principle. It can't be v...
September 25, 2025 at 00:41
What are the two types of causes? I was trying to limit my discussion to efficient cause. Did I fail?
September 25, 2025 at 00:10
I'm lost. Confused. Is what we are calling mechanistic cause the same as efficient cause. That was what I intended. It's Newtonian cause. f = ma; F = ...
September 25, 2025 at 00:02
I have come to see that philosophy is a practice like meditation, exercise, learning musical instruments, tai chi, martial arts, and similar enterpris...
September 24, 2025 at 04:48
@"apokrisis" @"Count Timothy von Icarus" @"Patterner" @"Janus" @"JuanZu" @"bert1" I often complain that people don't put enough effort into providing ...
September 24, 2025 at 03:23
I do understand the point you were trying to make. As I said previously, there are everyday, common sense situations where the chain of causality is s...
September 24, 2025 at 00:40
I've been going back and forth trying to figure out how to respond to this for awhile. I haven't given up. I'll be back later.
September 24, 2025 at 00:22
Back in olden days, there was a country and bluegrass comedy duo called Homer and Jethro. They would tell silly jokes like the ones you're discussing....
September 23, 2025 at 20:01
I guess that’s my understanding of what a constraint is— something that prevents something else from happening. It reduces the number of possible futu...
September 23, 2025 at 00:15
But there have been tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions of mutations that led to the multiplicity of life here on earth. Just saying “m...
September 23, 2025 at 00:12
That doesn’t make sense to me. All there is is energy. Matter is energy. It’s changes in energy that need a causal description.
September 23, 2025 at 00:06