You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Ciceronianus

Comments

The power of jargon is limited, as its use should be. Legal jargon may serve in communications with other lawyers and with judges, but must be explain...
June 23, 2020 at 18:22
If by "studied" you mean formal study such as that provided by university professors, no. My happy, carefree college days, to the extent they were dev...
June 23, 2020 at 15:54
2.4k posts? You must be the Great Pretender. Turn if off again.
June 22, 2020 at 21:28
Well, if we must speak in terms of objects and assume that everything is either an object or "presents" as an object (I'd rather not), one way it coul...
June 22, 2020 at 20:56
I tend to fall in the pantheism/panpsychism camp. But it's always annoyed me when Christian apologists, for example, refer to the famous proofs of God...
June 22, 2020 at 19:06
Very fitting, KK.
June 22, 2020 at 19:03
Sorry, no. I'm saying that if we accept your definitions, we can't escape it.
June 22, 2020 at 19:01
Hmm. Why wouldn't we objectify an object if we have a non-aesthetical experience? It's still an experience of an object, no?
June 22, 2020 at 18:55
Yes. That's always been the problem with Aquinas' arguments "proving" the existence of God, and the problem with others trying to take advantage of th...
June 22, 2020 at 18:53
Why assume such a thing (if we can even meaningfully speak of anything "outside the universe") would be anything like "God" as believed in by some of ...
June 22, 2020 at 18:19
Well, then, I suppose we should "almost certainly" believe in something uncaused. Whatever that may be.
June 22, 2020 at 18:09
There's that word "present" again. Present yourself appropriately if you wish to be judged as a "whole person" is the admonishment made. If you don't ...
June 22, 2020 at 18:05
Let's consider the question. Is it a question which assumes there are things called "aesthetic experiences" we can act towards, accept or avoid in som...
June 22, 2020 at 16:34
It's true the thought of debating such old chestnuts fills me with a kind of dread. Next you'll be threatening me with quotes from Descartes. Vade ret...
June 19, 2020 at 17:33
You need not on my account. As I think I said, I don't accept the subject/object distinction. I don't think we're spectators of the world or that ther...
June 18, 2020 at 20:26
A fourteen-year old would also find the rough sex scenes in both Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead interesting.
June 18, 2020 at 16:12
I'm just asking you to define the terms you've decided to use, you know. But if you prefer to avoid doing so, I suppose that's as good a way as any.
June 18, 2020 at 16:04
Ah, now there are material objects. Is this a subset of physical objects (the set in which we're included)? If so, what is the distinction between mat...
June 18, 2020 at 14:21
I see. It isn't moral to objectify some physical objects, then, although we must perforce objectify them, since they're physical objects. The objectif...
June 17, 2020 at 20:39
The new portrait/image you mean? Just giving Marcus Tullius Cicero his due.
June 17, 2020 at 20:30
Why, I wonder, is it a "no-brainer" to say we're more than "purely/exclusively objective-objects" (whatever that may mean) if we're physical objects a...
June 17, 2020 at 18:42
A very wise man once said, and keeps saying: Ayn Rand is to philosophy what L. Ron Hubbard is to religion.
June 17, 2020 at 13:39
This is the definition of "objectification" with which this thread began: Not to say Wikipedia is the last word on anything, but as this definition co...
June 16, 2020 at 19:21
Well, as you wish. For me, the ethical implications of objectification are the only implications of significance. The subject/object thing does nothin...
June 16, 2020 at 17:30
Why believe that finding someone sexually attractive and acting on that attraction constitutes objectification? As far as I'm aware, nobody has claime...
June 16, 2020 at 15:39
It seems he wasn't a likeable man in general, prone to insult, pretentious and arrogant. But perhaps he associated the woman too much with his mother,...
June 16, 2020 at 15:32
I'm not sure, but I don't think it follows from the fact that we want to see what someone looks like that we objectify them. As far as I know, there's...
June 15, 2020 at 20:26
It's quite possible to feel desire or attraction for a person without objectifying them. There's a difference between a thing and a person, and no gre...
June 15, 2020 at 17:50
What poor, dumb animals we men must be if the sight of female flesh so incapacitates our intelligence that we're compelled to objectify women because ...
June 15, 2020 at 16:23
I wonder if he said this before or after he pushed a woman down a stairway because he thought she was too loud. Later, he gloated when she died thereb...
June 15, 2020 at 16:12
What little I've read about honor ethics and honor generally seems to me to be a form of virtue ethics, but one devoted, specifically, to what were an...
June 12, 2020 at 16:24
That's quite useful, thank you.
June 12, 2020 at 16:09
This wasn't the oath when I was a cub scout. It's been changed. The word "honor" didn't appear. In 2015, it seems, they even dispensed with "obey the ...
June 12, 2020 at 16:05
I forgot about the Mafia. Honor and respect, yes. I thought Baden Powell was one of those "muscular christian" types. A Tom Brown's Schooldays sort th...
June 11, 2020 at 21:18
Our current president is so uniquely offensive that, judging from some of the recent headlines indicating that certain generals find him appalling, ca...
June 11, 2020 at 21:10
I vaguely recall doing similar things. My family has never been particularly handy, so I remember being particularly embarrassed by my efforts at craf...
June 11, 2020 at 20:35
Sounds somewhat like a kind of virtue ethics, then. As I recall, the cub scout oath contains language by which the scout promises "to be square and ob...
June 11, 2020 at 19:10
I assumed aspects of that culture might be part of it. Also perhaps the view that certain kinds of conduct are worthy or unworthy. I think it was Menc...
June 11, 2020 at 19:04
Well then, when he referred to some god being needed to save us in Der Spiegel, he must have meant some other god, not himself. At least he said "god"...
June 10, 2020 at 22:31
Ah, thank you for this analogy. Prepare ye the way of the Lord!
June 10, 2020 at 21:46
My fury is reserved for Heidegger. I'm merely amazed, and baffled, by those who admire him. It's odd, isn't it, for a philosopher to be enamored by a ...
June 10, 2020 at 14:43
It may be a fault in me, but I'm unable to separate the man and his work so blithely. Sort of like Tom Lehrer and Wernher von Braun. https://www.youtu...
June 09, 2020 at 14:40
That may be so, I'm afraid, or close to the mark. There is a kind of revulsion.
June 09, 2020 at 14:37
Everyone knows he was a Nazi, yes. Some even know he was a devoted one. But this is trivial to philosophers and students of philosophy, a concern only...
June 09, 2020 at 02:30
If only there were such bots, ready to pounce at every reverent mention of his name.
June 09, 2020 at 01:17
No, no. He'd say Yawhol!, not "yawn." He was quite punctilious, especially during his time as Rector at Freiburg. I doubt he ever yawned in that joyou...
June 09, 2020 at 01:12
Well, not Caesar. While after his death effective power was held by the second triumvirate, followed by the contest between Antony and Octavian, Caesa...
June 08, 2020 at 22:52
I congratulate myself on my restraint in not commenting in this thread. It seems I've learned to control my contempt for this vile, loathsome, bigoted...
June 08, 2020 at 15:19
You can dream the American Dream But you sleep with the lights on And wake up with a scream --The Late, Great Warren Zevon, Fistful of Rain 'Nuff said...
June 02, 2020 at 19:25
Well, I can rant as well. Bear with me. Or don't and pass on. I find it odd that as I grow older, I become less and less conservative. Politically, in...
June 01, 2020 at 19:40