If I understand this correctly, it's that Deleuze is concerned with the "canonization" of philosophers, and the subsequent assimilation of thought. Th...
Most of our actions are related to overcoming a certain amount of deprivation. Not all deprivation is bad, however, only the deprivation that makes us...
"The worst sin towards our fellow creatures is not to hate them, but to be indifferent to them: that's the essence of inhumanity." - George Bernard Sh...
As a consequentialist, I have generally two options to pick within consequentialist ethics - act and rule consequentialism. These are further refined ...
We are conscious but do not have a robust sense of self. It is only with the sudden experience of something extremely unexpected and strange that a ph...
Ever since the legendary epic smack-down between Quine and Carnap, in which Quine objectively won and thus rescued metaphysics by placing it on the sa...
Correct, which is why I was primarily interested in those who are worse-off. We have to balance the input with the output. If tending to them does not...
Seems to me that the average person would say the same thing about philosophy in general. Who the hell cares whether or not God exist, so long as I ge...
Exactly. Our abilities (or lack thereof) do not dictate morality. The guilt comes from the fact that someone is ignoring a compelling experience. To n...
How do you know the absence of anything could have been sufficient? It's certainly conceivable that the various things in the world are contingent, bu...
This is also why I think it was in Schopenhauer's (and others') (literal) best-interest to identify as a misanthrope, because this allows him and othe...
The problem that I see with this is that, especially coming from a pessimist such as yourself, the world is already not worth living in, so these loss...
Guilt is indeed a motivator for action. True. So the governments of countries with impoverished citizens are of most suspect - but the countries aroun...
Then why is this not applied to the homeless African child, or the slave labor of China, or the constant mutilation of animals in the wild? Do you hav...
I would like to hear from other people as well. I'm not trying to be a jerk when I say this, but how do you live with yourself while knowing there are...
Not helping them would betray a form of misanthropy. Back in the days of the classical pessimists, then, misanthropy could be compatible with ascetici...
This is an important point: we don't know how our actions are going to affect others, like a butterfly effect. But whereas there is merely a hypotheti...
Absolutely. Empathy and compassion are the primary sources of morality. Any attempt to ground morality primarily by different means, I think, gets the...
What difference does intention make here, aside from legal considerations? Standing idly by while recognizing the existence of suffering can still be ...
Well, I see little to no distinction between doing and allowing harm. What matters is that harm is happening, and you are complicit in it if you are n...
Also, I think you might find interest in at least some of what the analytics have to say, particularly Koslicki, Loux, Lowe and Tahko (hard-core hylom...
Why is this reductionism a bad thing, what is this dichotomy, and what kind of monism do you suppose they are attempting to find? Heidegger is extreme...
I think mostly because suffering illuminates our existential condition while happiness clouds our knowledge of it. We cannot be happy while actually c...
Well, no. But when we have to make a decision, someone's suffering being worse than another person's makes them of moral priority. My disappointed wis...
The late E.J. Lowe, Jonathan Schaffer, Tuomas Tahko, Ted Sider, Susan Haack, Michael J. Loux, the late David Lewis, Peter van Inwagen, Timothy William...
Also, contemporary realist metaphysics is largely concerned with ontology and not with the broader metaphysical stories. It's far more conservative th...
Everything went into "belittling" their suffering in order to recognize the existence of a much worse suffering. Well I wouldn't call it a victory - I...
Because I'm also a consequentialist, and I think some actions are worse than others depending on what their consequences are. So I'm not dismissing th...
What is this particular way? The semiotic trifold? Again, you have any examples? I'd wager probably those who have a background in both science and ph...
Do you have any examples of this? It might have had a great affect on your particular conception of metaphysics - again, we're having a meta-philosoph...
I don't see how I am. People are suffering, and they will continue to do so while they are alive. It's akin to taking an aspirin for a headache. You r...
This same reasoning could be applied to birth - suffering is not absolved by abstaining from procreation, only prevented from inflicting it's harm. Pa...
I don't really understand what you have in mind when you say "romanticism" or "PoMo". Do you not appreciate Spinoza, Descartes, Husserl, Heidegger, et...
There's different methods within this broad "scientific" account you presented. If you're an astronomer, you'll use a telescope. If you're a microbiol...
I'm not trying to separate philosophy and science per se, merely point out that there seems to be more than one method of understanding the world. In ...
But the spirit of preventing future suffering can make sure something that happened in the past does not happen again. The universe does not keep scor...
You should read The Last Messiah. It's a short essay available online outlining his metaphysical views on all this. Humans require meaning in a meanin...
Yes, indeed, pain is not equivalent to suffering. But pain without meaning (amongst other factors) constitutes suffering. Zapffe touched on this: huma...
We can replace "predominantly" with "structurally necessary" and get the same general conclusion, albeit a more aesthetic one. Although I think it's l...
Comments