You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

_db

Comments

Because without universals similarity or resemblance becomes arbitrary. There is no reason for the way things are - they just are. Brute fact. Languag...
September 21, 2016 at 19:16
In: Living  — view comment
In most cases I would argue that what stops us form committing suicide is an inherent instinct to survive that overrides any higher-level thought proc...
September 21, 2016 at 18:58
But what makes it the case that they are similar, other than the possession of identical properties? Is it just a brute fact? Why is @@ similar to @ @...
September 21, 2016 at 17:39
I disagree with your analysis on 2. Certainly freedom and harm are not only personal matters but also abstract matters, that nevertheless depend on pe...
September 21, 2016 at 03:36
I read the Echiridion. There were some useful ideas in it but overall I was struck by how many "do's" and "do not's" there were, as if we had to jump ...
September 20, 2016 at 23:33
But doesn't liberation require some sort of oppression? i.e. there would be no need for liberation if oppression was not the case?
September 20, 2016 at 23:31
But you're being inconsistent with your use of "existence". You said that nothing can't come from nothing, and yet say that a constraint of pure poten...
September 20, 2016 at 23:28
So the disaster, catastrophe, tragedy, etc are material arguments. You're sweeping them away as if they're unimportant yet they still are an astute ob...
September 20, 2016 at 06:53
umm
September 20, 2016 at 06:42
And what is this everythingness other than pure possibility, what you just denied was the case? What is everythingness?
September 20, 2016 at 06:41
Being lost in the woods when it's negative ten degrees out and snowing and you have no tent or warm clothes because you barely survived a plane crash ...
September 20, 2016 at 04:24
I never said that. I said that there has to be some sort of hypostasis, the Aristotelian Being of Pure Actuality, for something to appear. "Nothing" i...
September 20, 2016 at 04:21
Because you're not espousing a neutral balanced position. You're implicitly favoring life - only a nihilist could actually argue that life is neither ...
September 20, 2016 at 04:16
I don't see what you're saying here. I agree there are emergent phenomenon, but these nevertheless are dependent upon a more basic ontological level. ...
September 20, 2016 at 03:59
Okay: life sucks for the majority of sentient organisms that aren't lucky enough to get out relatively scar-free. Actually my position is realism, but...
September 20, 2016 at 00:23
Emergence from what? poof! existence, ta-da! Objects need not be "clumpy" to be objects. Again this depends on what you consider to be objects. Voids ...
September 19, 2016 at 23:50
I don't think you understand how not all axiology or aesthetics is realist in nature. Any value is going to be subjective, depending on the existence ...
September 19, 2016 at 23:33
Patronizing other people doesn't help. For some reason these kinds of debates always end up with everyone getting so butthurt. Coming from the opposit...
September 19, 2016 at 23:21
Yes, this, very much. This is a big part of what I was getting at: while the rest of science can easily point to what they study, the metaphysician ha...
September 19, 2016 at 22:59
One of the easiest and yet also one of the most difficult, imo, thought experiments relates to "totalist" consequentialism: adding happy people to the...
September 19, 2016 at 22:42
Indeed that was the view of Zapffe, that the Universe is incapable of delivering enough for us. This kind of thought can also be seen in the Gnostics ...
September 19, 2016 at 22:30
How do you account for similarity and difference if not by universals. i.e. what if your flavor of nominalism?
September 19, 2016 at 21:01
Another interesting part of Moore's book is the emphasis on the tension between self-consciousness and self-confidence. If we're too self-confident, w...
September 19, 2016 at 20:57
I'm a phenomenologist, I don't know where that puts me on that spectrum. *drop mic* In any case I'm a realist about philosophical questions but am unc...
September 19, 2016 at 19:30
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyHNuVaZJ-k https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjgm3xHr96Q
September 19, 2016 at 19:26
I mean, you aren't really a nominalist, are you? ;)
September 18, 2016 at 19:16
The problem with this view of ethics in my opinion is that it fundamentally misconstrues what ethics is all about: people. The welfare of people. Peop...
September 18, 2016 at 19:11
However, if asceticism is what floats your boat, then go for it. The unattainable is still worthy of striving for, I'd say. In the end of the day, wha...
September 18, 2016 at 18:14
Natural law theory is a dangerous tool used to defend bigotry.
September 17, 2016 at 18:45
What does it mean that we live in an eternal moment? Eternity assumes that there is some kind of relative time definer. Are you thinking of presentism...
September 17, 2016 at 01:41
" there is more to be learned from each page of David Hume than from the collected philosophical works of Hegel, Herbart and Schleiermacher taken toge...
September 16, 2016 at 23:52
This is part of the Asymmetry: there doesn't seem to be any need to make happy people. But there does seem to be a need in making people happy. The di...
September 16, 2016 at 23:40
That's what I'm saying.
September 16, 2016 at 22:15
Good, you're not a nominalist, phew. Transcendental or immanent, though?
September 16, 2016 at 21:39
Paging , he knows a lot about Heidegger.
September 16, 2016 at 21:23
I'm surprised you don't find it at least somewhat compelling. The idea that we have an obligation to bring happy people into existence seems to be a b...
September 16, 2016 at 19:20
Which is exactly why I said that we have inherent negative-utilitarian dispositions. No amount of pleasure can justify a torture, or a murder, i.e. in...
September 16, 2016 at 05:47
Probably the first truly philosophical question.
September 16, 2016 at 04:47
It acts as a cathartic release of tension and a way of focusing myself when I feel anxious or uneasy. I mostly limit myself to music, however. I liste...
September 16, 2016 at 03:27
This aesthetic component, though, is only really helpful when you aren't suffering. The idea of a Stoic sage sounds sublime and amazing - but we would...
September 16, 2016 at 02:52
Well I mean this thread went exactly as I hoped it wouldn't (veered off topic) so like, what the hell, why not talk about something totally off topic?...
September 15, 2016 at 17:44
Sorry, I meant in previous threads. I seem to recall you arguing that you view all desires and needs as though they are bad. When I think there needs ...
September 14, 2016 at 14:22
I realize that my previous post might not have been as clear as I had thought so I'm making another. When we look at our lives, we typically say we ha...
September 14, 2016 at 02:30
This is silly. Have you considered that you are deluded? Both of us have our beliefs and questioning the foundations of them is going to have to be th...
September 13, 2016 at 04:46
Discomfort that is not wanted. An experience that does not match with a person's preferences. Something that must be endured or eliminated because it ...
September 13, 2016 at 04:28
Damn right.
September 13, 2016 at 04:19
This is hardly a challenge, as you have ignored the point I made several times about how pain is not equivalent to suffering. A mashochist who enjoys ...
September 13, 2016 at 03:39
AND THAT IS PERFECTLY FINE (in fact what I was originally focused on in the OP)... ...except when you start to argue that the overall holistic context...
September 13, 2016 at 02:49
Your holism ignores the specifics in favor of a global analysis. When in reality phenomenologically consciousness is it's own universe in itself, rega...
September 13, 2016 at 02:27
I did not mean that you hadn't, only that we have strayed far away from the original intent of the thread. And your arguments aren't even arguments ei...
September 12, 2016 at 23:04