You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

_db

Comments

If consciousness is not the product of the brain, there seems to be two options: Occasionalism, which holds that there is no causal relationship betwe...
January 01, 2018 at 21:40
Read more primary sources Self-initiate exposure therapy to anxiety triggers Organize my thoughts more for my book Regularly volunteer in the communit...
December 31, 2017 at 07:08
I'd have to try to find where he said it, but from my memory Wittgenstein wasn't necessarily saying that philosophy was "amazing" (especially since he...
December 30, 2017 at 05:30
Not sure I understand what you're asking.
December 30, 2017 at 05:25
Kant said the prior triad, and Wittgenstein affirmed the awe of perennial questions.
December 30, 2017 at 05:24
In the words of Julio Cabrera, philosophy is like my oxygen. Most everything else is nuisance. Part of what attracts me so much to philosophy is its l...
December 30, 2017 at 05:16
I live only because it is in my power to die when I choose to: without the idea of suicide, I'd have killed myself right away. Emil Cioran, All Gall i...
December 30, 2017 at 03:59
According to Philip Nitschke (not Nietzsche), supplying aging citizens with easy means for a painless suicide will actually increase life expectancy a...
December 30, 2017 at 03:44
...from the thread, yes. Go make another thread if you want to shit on Feyerabend.
December 30, 2017 at 01:28
Why would I, when that would just distract from the point of this thread?
December 29, 2017 at 22:57
Yes, Feser's arguments are not focused on the temporal cosmological arguments but are focused on hierarchical arguments.
December 29, 2017 at 22:39
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought Aquinas didn't say an infinite regress was impossible? I thought he actually specifically said that it could no...
December 29, 2017 at 22:38
Why are you changing the topic of discussion? just wants other theorists that are similar to Feyerabend.
December 29, 2017 at 22:35
It is a decent introductory book, but I felt Chalmer's take on Feyerabend was far too short (only a measly seven-or-so pages) and failed to charitably...
December 29, 2017 at 22:32
You've responded by merely asserting mathematics is objective while morality is not. This discussion keeps going in circles.
December 26, 2017 at 20:11
Yeah but also mathematics, which isn't scientific strictly. No. We never "perceive amounts", since we need to already have the concept of amounts befo...
December 26, 2017 at 18:39
Scientific testing involves the use of mathematics that have already been discovered by synthetic a priori analysis.
December 26, 2017 at 18:07
That may be true, but how does this alter morality's truth value? And after all, many scientists and mathematicians are deeply amazed by the beauty of...
December 26, 2017 at 16:59
From the a priori intuition that killing people needlessly is wrong.
December 26, 2017 at 16:58
LOL no, I'd make the conclusion that killing this person was wrong.
December 26, 2017 at 08:54
I am not a solipsist by any means. How is 5+5=10 different from saying murder is wrong?
December 26, 2017 at 08:10
How do we demonstrate mathematical law, and how is this different to moral law?
December 26, 2017 at 07:31
Can you explain to me what you see to be the difference between mathematics and morality in terms of objectivity, and why the former is objectively re...
December 26, 2017 at 07:10
Feyerabend is so good man, and really funny too. He's ultimately concerned mostly about morality.
December 26, 2017 at 07:01
He's all about keeping science separated from state so as to maintain human freedom and liberty.
December 26, 2017 at 05:56
Yet Descartes specifically argued that an evil demon could be tricking us into believing 2+2=4. Do you understand what I mean when I say "intuitive"? ...
December 26, 2017 at 05:56
Are you familiar with Paul Feyerabend? Sounds like you'd like some of his stuff.
December 26, 2017 at 05:28
Now you're begging the question, though. In what way is demonstrating a mathematical proof different than demonstrating a moral proof? Yes, I am makin...
December 26, 2017 at 05:20
Look, I've already demonstrated to you that morality can come in the form of valid logical syllogisms, and that the premises are what are being doubte...
December 26, 2017 at 04:43
The same could be said about mathematics. You keep going in circles, assuming mathematics is objective and empirical. Just because you disagree with a...
December 26, 2017 at 03:59
Are you not familiar with moral proofs? Moral principles are cognitive and can be manipulated in logic. We can make proofs. The question is whether or...
December 26, 2017 at 03:39
No, once again, mathematics is synthetic a priori. We don't "see" numbers. We don't "see" math. Nowhere in the sense data are you going to find that. ...
December 26, 2017 at 03:07
No, I don't think beliefs change reality. But I don't think you quite understand that it's not obvious to me, based on what you've said, that mathemat...
December 26, 2017 at 02:12
How do you know this? Again, you're just asserting the objectivity of mathematics. In the same way you would check mathematical proofs. By thinking ab...
December 26, 2017 at 00:35
But we check statements like 5+5=11 by thinking. You're just assuming mathematics is objective, but it is the person themselves that has to think abou...
December 25, 2017 at 23:45
How cryptic...
December 25, 2017 at 22:56
How do we perceive amounts? Pretty sure we're given sense data and our mental faculties organize it. Do you think we perceive space and time?
December 25, 2017 at 20:59
How do I know what two, three, and five objects are, though? I must already have numbers as an a priori concept before.
December 25, 2017 at 20:17
Basically, moral principles are a priori and can be manipulated into valid logical inferences, operating similarly to mathematical axioms. Many people...
December 25, 2017 at 00:37
How do we do this? I'm stressing that mathematics is synthetic a priori, not synthetic a posteriori. We don't do mathematical experiments, at least no...
December 25, 2017 at 00:14
You keep asserting this but I've denied this every time. I just see moral principles as on basically the same level as mathematical principles. Forget...
December 25, 2017 at 00:01
k
December 24, 2017 at 23:59
It's not a fact, it's just a useless and sneaky way for a lot of people to escape having to justify their beliefs by pretending to be the "null positi...
December 24, 2017 at 23:52
Just because people can be mistaken in moral beliefs or moral perceptions doesn't mean morality isn't objective. People disagree about things all the ...
December 24, 2017 at 23:43
The point is that agnostic atheism/theism complicates matters unnecessarily. We just want to know what you believe, not how "confidently" you believe ...
December 24, 2017 at 23:35
No, agnosticism in philosophy is the lack of any belief on the matter. This is why agnostic atheism and agnostic theism are logically incoherent. Don'...
December 24, 2017 at 22:54
You don't "hear" the calling of the face of a victim? You don't "hear" the inner voice of your conscience telling you to do something? You don't see m...
December 24, 2017 at 22:45
I am only saying that morality oftentimes takes the form of a command-from-afar. I'm providing a phenomenological description of our experience of mor...
December 24, 2017 at 20:45
I'm hesitant to answer this. I'm only describing what it's like. It's a command from the Other, whether that be God, a victim's face, or whatever. Aga...
December 24, 2017 at 20:29
Sure, I'll give one. Morality is given to us in the form of a command-from-afar, as something we ought to do. It is not an expression of an emotion, a...
December 24, 2017 at 20:21