You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

ToothyMaw

Comments

Cocky Libertarian gets humbled by Neuroscientist on the Reality of (the nonexistence of) Free-Will. edit: I'm going to actually try to say something s...
March 17, 2023 at 18:31
:ok: Well said, sounds about right for me too.
March 17, 2023 at 18:10
I've noticed that I seem to be using two different meanings of the word "logic". I am designating goals as being logical, and also using the more scie...
March 17, 2023 at 15:10
I suppose. My point is that even the successful, less logical outcome must contain some logic to be of use given there are some basic logical prerequi...
March 16, 2023 at 11:17
Well, in that case, I at least, try to think that way. I have some overarching principles and really only view that which is logical and reasonable as...
March 15, 2023 at 16:17
I'm only talking about some instances in which there is a deliberate, rational consideration of what to believe. I don't think humans really think thi...
March 15, 2023 at 15:59
I think that to say that perspectives only have value insofar as they produce the desired outcomes doesn’t deal with the selection of which outcomes s...
March 15, 2023 at 13:09
I would like to discuss Aristotle with you but, honestly, I'm reading about this and none of it is making sense. Wikipedia is not ideal for learning t...
March 14, 2023 at 16:12
The proximity to the powers that be seems to be important to me: the corporation, while faceless, takes the position of the provider to a certain degr...
March 14, 2023 at 15:24
It seems arbitrary to designate the illogical and fallacious perspective to be correct merely because it produces happiness. But I understand you are ...
March 14, 2023 at 12:44
Okay, but - and you seem to agree with this - the formulation of good moves is still informed by reason in chess, even if it isn't the same kind of re...
March 13, 2023 at 15:43
Upon reading a few more times: did you actually write this, Judaka? It's like you told ChatGPT to write like a cross between the Joker and someone try...
March 12, 2023 at 18:40
I hope my post wasn't too critical, by the way. I think it is a thought-provoking OP. I get the feeling Judaka is concerned with an individual's inter...
March 12, 2023 at 17:56
You make it sound like the process of reaching conclusions goes backwards; when someone addresses an issue of some complexity, I would expect them to ...
March 12, 2023 at 12:26
Okay, I think we almost entirely agree. That doesn't happen a whole lot on this site. Would you say we ought to reduce suffering regardless of the sta...
March 12, 2023 at 00:22
Thanks to the people who read my story and voted. I enjoyed reading everyone else's submissions too. The critical feedback was mostly great. Honestly,...
December 18, 2022 at 20:53
I don't feel like I deserve those compliments, but thank you.
December 18, 2022 at 20:31
Hypericin for Is this a Turing test.
December 15, 2022 at 14:12
No, I mean that the test is for a machine or human reading the story. The story seems to intend to expose a machine i.e., a machine that can identify ...
December 15, 2022 at 14:05
Yeah, I feel bad for saying what I said. It does what it intends to do, so I can't fault it in that regard. edit: now I don't feel bad
December 15, 2022 at 13:46
:razz:
December 15, 2022 at 13:42
I think "Is this a Turing Test?" is perhaps the most misunderstood story submitted yet. It is flawlessly written, but it's a little weird considering ...
December 14, 2022 at 22:05
Okay, this seems important. A machine would likely read this as the AI not getting enough credit, and a normal person would likely view the gratitude ...
December 14, 2022 at 20:55
My guess is that this was submitted by a relatively new member. edit: I have a good idea of who it was, but it doesn't really matter, honestly. Good w...
December 14, 2022 at 20:10
Quite incisive. An open question is if the story is a Turing test. Well, a normal human probably wouldn't think of it as so and would just comment on ...
December 14, 2022 at 19:50
I must be missing something. Literary interpretation is not my strong suit.
December 11, 2022 at 00:37
I want the time I spent reading this back. edit: although I understand the exercise
December 10, 2022 at 23:46
Right. Thanks for the wisdom, Josh. I'll look into some more contemporary accounts of philosophy of science.
December 06, 2022 at 17:07
I find that every time I talk about something I don't really understand on this forum I get corrected. Maybe I should stop talking about things I don'...
December 06, 2022 at 16:54
Right. I agree, I'm probably just not in touch with how science is related to culture. Probably because I'm no scientist or philosopher of science. Bu...
December 06, 2022 at 16:49
I don't see how culture would get in the way of good science. Scientists, if they are good scientists, largely shouldn't pay attention to culture. Tha...
December 06, 2022 at 14:48
What? Where are these aliens? Do you mean smart people? I think people often change their worldviews in light of discovering new, complex ideas, altho...
December 06, 2022 at 13:42
I just used the term because it was expedient. I could have said "the totality of all of the things that make depression, depression", but that is cum...
December 05, 2022 at 19:13
I thought about it some more: philosophy of physics definitely matters, but most of our science is done through the same old methods outside of that h...
December 05, 2022 at 18:48
Not necessarily. What if their civilization imploded because of rampant moral relativism?
December 05, 2022 at 17:47
Thanks for the extended version of the argument and link to the article. Makes a lot of sense, and I certainly have no immediate objections.
December 05, 2022 at 15:46
In my experience, you can't cure a sadist or a psychopath, but you can get them to play by the rules. edit: for whatever that's worth
December 04, 2022 at 23:23
Yes, one can overcome such a predisposition. I have a predisposition for doing self-destructive things, but with time that has diminished. Sometimes y...
December 04, 2022 at 23:10
So, we are caused to will, but we are still willing one thing over another. Seems like a safe thing to say. How does that relate to the (probably misr...
December 04, 2022 at 22:57
I think Strawson would argue that the way we are is caused itself. That seems implicit in (3). edit: thus, our will would be caused because we will wh...
December 04, 2022 at 22:45
Okay, this doesn't make sense. You also behave the way you do based on external constraints. You might will one thing over another because of some eve...
December 04, 2022 at 22:00
I have mixed feelings about that man. edit: he is right about free-will and on religion, that is true, so I think he has been a force for good. But I ...
December 04, 2022 at 20:55
Definitely.
December 04, 2022 at 20:53
As for identifying them, I don't know. Maybe science will eventually give us some answers on that one, as philosophy doesn't seem up to the task. edit...
December 04, 2022 at 20:32
lmao, neither am I Given a basic text to interpret, yes. But the only objective common ground we seem to have is some putative universalized claims an...
December 04, 2022 at 20:26
edit: going to resolve this elsewhere than the actual thread
December 04, 2022 at 19:52
Maybe a promise creates an obligation, but that also doesn't propel it into facthood.
December 04, 2022 at 19:46
No, I'm saying that saying that if you promise to do something, and then say that there ought be a phenomenal manifestation of that promise being foll...
December 04, 2022 at 19:43
And you jerk yourself off every time you write a post, you sad little man.
December 03, 2022 at 22:18
You are claiming that the implicit promises somehow entail that we ought behave in ways that fulfill them. In what way do these implicit promises enta...
December 03, 2022 at 22:02