You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Tristan L

['Member']Joined: February 19, 2020 at 16:28Last active: August 05, 2021 at 09:434 discussions183 comments

Discussions (4)

Comments

You’ve got a point. However, what I really mean is this: There certainly are many people who have the resources (time, money, energy, asf.) to do usef...
April 07, 2021 at 16:49
By the sentence "the sun is identical to itself", I mean that the Sun is the selfsame thing as itself. This concerns only the Sun itself and has nothi...
November 20, 2020 at 18:58
It seems that what you mean by “Law of Identity” is not the same as what I mean by “Law of Identity”. Why I mean by that expression is the law that ea...
November 16, 2020 at 19:05
What, then, is an example of a trivial truth? True, but when you say I have to counter: The Identity Law isn’t a law about the meanings of terms, is i...
November 13, 2020 at 19:34
Actually, patterns do very much exist, and they can’t die, either. The laws of quantum theory tell us that information is preserved, and patterns are ...
November 11, 2020 at 19:45
Of course.
November 11, 2020 at 19:40
It’s actually because I love my family and am thankful to my parents for having begotten me. Why shouldn’t they be happy? By all means, they should! O...
November 11, 2020 at 19:34
Of course it isn’t necessarily trivial for us, but for logic (witcraft), any two logically equivalent propositions are basically the same, and since a...
November 11, 2020 at 19:16
Importantly, I can “see” the thing meant by ‘4’ and the thing meant by ‘5’, but I can’t “see” any entity x which is a mind and stands behind any accou...
November 09, 2020 at 18:31
Well, it certainly isn’t old-fashioned or outmoded for me :smile:. But aren’t all lineages equally old, namely billions of years? (I’m splitting hairs...
November 09, 2020 at 18:22
Try to say “5 is odd” and “six is even” at the same moment. Well, when I was little, I thought to myself that almight includes the ability to make som...
November 09, 2020 at 18:05
It means being true by the laws of logic and thereby true in a very strong, very necessary way. Actually, the two are equivalent, and I think that you...
November 09, 2020 at 18:00
Of course I’m a man. After all, I’m called “Tristan”, and I signed my very first post on this forum with the masculine (manly) a-stem “Tristanaz”, whe...
November 07, 2020 at 12:14
I can’t help but realize that this is of great relevance to my very first thread on this forum, Is negation the same as affirmation?.
November 07, 2020 at 12:02
I don’t really want to go into the details there because it isn’t the subject of this thread, but I regard categories, properties, and other universal...
November 07, 2020 at 11:58
(my boldening) You express your right feeling for the truth of LNC in the words emboldened by me above. In order not to be wrong, you first have to di...
November 07, 2020 at 11:50
Well, when I’m in radical-questioning-mode, I regard eveything as a hypothesis, inlcuding the Law of Identity and even this very statement. However, w...
November 07, 2020 at 10:21
I’ve always wanted to go on with this thread, but I had been putting it off and forgetting it at times. Interesting ideas. You’ve got a point, and it’...
November 05, 2020 at 15:41
In: Platonism  — view comment
:confused:??? Well, regardless of whose opinion it is, it is false, plain and simple. If you had kept up with mathematical developments in the last ov...
November 05, 2020 at 15:08
Perhaps, but if there is a contradiction, where is it? Also, speech is important, but let’s not overestimate its importance. We know Existence itself ...
November 05, 2020 at 14:17
Actually, conjunction is a bit like multiplication, whereas it is exclusive disjunction (EITHER-OR, XOR) which is a bit like addition. And like multip...
November 05, 2020 at 14:03
Who said that they would? I’ve only done a certain mental activity which I interpret as telling my fingers to type that post and send it, and I hypoth...
November 05, 2020 at 12:19
I’d say the mind, and I’d most probably stay with the one who has my wife’s mind. However, more importantly, I’d hunt for the mad scientist or thought...
November 05, 2020 at 10:21
Interesting question! I think that you seem to think of conjunction (AND, ?) as akin to addition (PLUS, +) and of logical negation (NOT, ¬) as akin to...
November 05, 2020 at 10:13
In: Platonism  — view comment
No, not at all, but everything must be either black or not black, and either white or not white. No, not really. Precise (Narrowkiry) mathematical the...
November 04, 2020 at 20:51
In: Platonism  — view comment
Firstly, check out this: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/eke#Etymology_1 to brush up your English. Secondly, it’s no wonder that this talk is just gett...
November 04, 2020 at 17:46
Not even I, the friend of Anglish (Anglisc), have heard of it :wink:. Let’s just use “he”, for orspringlily (originally), the so-called “masculine” ge...
November 04, 2020 at 11:51
In: Platonism  — view comment
Well, if he knows that he knows nothing, then on one hand, what he knows must be true – otherwise he couldn’t know (wissen) it –, so he indeed knows n...
November 04, 2020 at 11:30
In: Platonism  — view comment
Eking (Addition/Amendment): (the ekings below are in bold typeface) “Reckonil” (cf. Theech "Rechner") is the right English word for “computer”. “To re...
November 03, 2020 at 06:48
In: Platonism  — view comment
Let’s not lose sight of the topic of this thread, namely Platonism and platonism. Let’s first talk about Platonism, the philosophy of Plato. This phil...
November 02, 2020 at 20:04
In: Platonism  — view comment
reply to my posts or quote me, I get notified of your answers.] Are you saying that Damascius (Damaskios) was a rationalist? Anyway, Damascius’ though...
November 02, 2020 at 20:02
In: Platonism  — view comment
I don’t think so, for I didn’t assume LEM; rather, I proved it with the help of LNC and LDN. These two, in turn, follow directly from the wist (essenc...
October 29, 2020 at 20:54
In: Platonism  — view comment
@"Gary M Washburn" I find the Shape (Form, Idea, Widea) of Contrariety indeed spellbinding. Let’s now apply it to itself in a way: If everything isn’t...
October 28, 2020 at 18:09
In: Platonism  — view comment
Well, LEM follows from LNC (the Law of Not-Contradiction) and LDN (the Law of Double Negation) like so: For every proposition A, it’s true that if 0. ...
October 28, 2020 at 18:04
In: Platonism  — view comment
The word “Shape” with an uppercase ‘S’ means the same as “Form” (with uppercase ‘F’) and “Idea” (with uppercase ‘I’), as in “Theory of Shapes/Forms/Id...
October 17, 2020 at 09:49
It’s true that Jungle Law seems to be the ultimate law in this world, but that doesn’t mean that we should simply accept it. After all, we hope to hav...
October 15, 2020 at 18:37
In: Platonism  — view comment
Sounds interesting. Just one remark: The Shape of Contrariety makes your position possible in the first place, doesn’t it?
October 15, 2020 at 17:57
Yes, I agree. That is indeed a good aspect of Rome. Compare that to the (for the most part) very ethno-supremacist ancient Greeks (Diogenes of Sinope ...
October 13, 2020 at 16:19
True, which is why I wrote earlier: By the way, I can’t help but notice that @"ssu"’s country is not one of them :wink:.
October 13, 2020 at 16:02
You’re right, that’s very likely human nature, and it’s a main reason why almost all empires are bad as far as they are empires – after all, the empir...
October 13, 2020 at 16:01
In: Platonism  — view comment
True, and that’s the thing; we aren’t actually referring to individual papers. The expression does refer to something, though, and that something must...
October 13, 2020 at 15:15
In: Platonism  — view comment
Well, I do admit that I’m not (hopefully only yet?) wise, not even remotely, and so my thoughts are still full of vagueness, so it comes as not surpri...
October 13, 2020 at 15:12
In: Platonism  — view comment
Well, I could be dreaming up all those other people with whom I talk, couldn’t I? Or, to be less radically solipsistic, how would anything change for ...
October 13, 2020 at 11:43
In: Platonism  — view comment
That’s actually not my position. I hold that there is no such thing as a concrete object, and that all things are abstract. The only beondes ("things"...
October 13, 2020 at 11:36
It’s true that most (though not all) ancients very likely had less to far less moral knowledge than most (though by far not all) moderners do, just as...
October 11, 2020 at 18:23
In: Platonism  — view comment
But I believe to have shown that you do. How else could we do that which we call “talking about even odd numbers”? There are no even odd numbers, and ...
October 11, 2020 at 17:49
In: Platonism  — view comment
I don’t know for sure*, but I’d say yes; what takes shape in a cloud chamber has the property meant by the word “cloudhood”, but it also depends on wh...
October 11, 2020 at 17:39
More broadly, imperialism is by its very wist (nature, essence) very wrong and unrightwise (unjust) – in most cases –, for it involves one folk steali...
October 10, 2020 at 09:57
Another important thing is that there aren’t simply “the Romans”, but different individuals with different merits and demerits among them. For instanc...
October 10, 2020 at 09:54
It is important to see both the merits and the demerits of an entity, be it an individual, a state, or an institution, and to realize that merits are ...
October 10, 2020 at 09:52