You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

A Christian Philosophy

Comments

Way better universe. You can actually shake hands.
July 18, 2017 at 01:51
While I agree with Mr. LeMaitre that religion and science should be separate, it is not fair to keep the 'creation ex nihilo' hypothesis while removin...
July 16, 2017 at 16:53
I understand your point, that at the time that there were 2 apples, then there were 2 apples, and at the time that there were 3 apples, then there wer...
July 16, 2017 at 16:44
'By some miracle'? As in 'caused by a miracle'? But a miracle is not nothing. What this says is that, while miraculous events escape the laws of physi...
July 16, 2017 at 16:26
Truth does not contradict truth, and so if a claim is illogical, then it cannot be true. That goes for all types of truths, including religious claims...
July 16, 2017 at 00:07
God's omnipotence is not defined as the ability to do anything whatsoever, but the ability to do anything that is logically possible. If God wills for...
July 15, 2017 at 22:55
Are you asking whether Calvinists believe in free will, or are you asking if there is room for free will if God willed whatever comes to pass? If the ...
July 15, 2017 at 22:05
It is true that for a mirror, our right becomes its left and vice versa, and I think the same would apply for coordinate systems. Alright, new attempt...
July 15, 2017 at 18:12
We need to differentiate between 3 modes of reality: (1) Impossible, (2) possible and not actual, (3) possible and actual. (1) 2+2=3 is impossible. It...
July 15, 2017 at 17:27
I'll play devil's advocate. Just because we don't see something from nothing, it does not mean that we can't see something from nothing. Having said t...
July 15, 2017 at 03:50
Hello. I never learned to read logic symbols like this, and just caught up by reading wikipedia for 5 minutes. But what happens if we reverse the vari...
July 15, 2017 at 03:37
Fun. I can think of one "move" that would not be the same, if we use the term generally to mean things like events and outcome: I raise my right hand ...
July 15, 2017 at 03:04
I agree with when he says that even money has no intrinsic value and only has extrinsic value as a means for exchange of other goods. The question is ...
July 15, 2017 at 02:56
It is true that the method gives the same step-by-step solution to both (1) perception of malicious intentions, and (2) perception of looking down on ...
July 14, 2017 at 03:14
It is true that if there is no end, then the means to that end becomes obsolete. But back to your original question about if there is something worth ...
July 14, 2017 at 02:47
Good question. They are both unethical behaviours for failing the golden rule; but 'malicious intent' is a dishonest mistake, where as 'looking down o...
July 13, 2017 at 03:29
If I understand you correctly, you are saying that stealing the plans is only a means to the end of the good cause, and thus not the end itself. This ...
July 13, 2017 at 02:47
Maybe this falls outside of your 'economical' theme, but what about stealing for a good cause? For example, stealing plans from the nazis to stop thei...
July 12, 2017 at 03:18
You are missing out on a really fun conversation. But as you wish. See you later.
July 11, 2017 at 03:07
I agree with you that 'some' does not necessarily mean 'all'. But it is also just logic that there are only 3 ways to see the proposition: (1) everyth...
July 10, 2017 at 02:09
Interesting claim. If I understand you correctly, you reject the proposition that "anything can come from nothing", and say that "some things can come...
July 09, 2017 at 02:40
Alright. See you later.
July 08, 2017 at 17:27
To be more specific, which following statement do you disagree with? 1. If a thing can come from nothing, then an apple can come into existence from n...
July 08, 2017 at 17:25
Here is my point: If the necessary consequence of a hypothesis is impossible, then the hypothesis is false. For the hypothesis 'Something can come fro...
July 08, 2017 at 02:36
Glad to see we can still find some solid ground in math. But now I see a possible contradiction with what you said earlier, regarding the apple scenar...
July 07, 2017 at 03:06
That is my thought as well. Non-classical systems are an addition to the classical system when classical logic has reached it limits, and not in oppos...
July 05, 2017 at 03:23
I will put this argument on hold to focus on the next one for now. You can change the symbols (such as from decimal system to duodecimal system as dis...
July 05, 2017 at 03:09
This is a non-personal conflict as per what I mean by 'personal'. Admittedly, I am not very clear about what I mean. Personal conflicts are ethical is...
June 28, 2017 at 03:24
Thanks. I have ventured in that weird place before. I am no expert at this non-classical logic thing, but my understanding is that, although different...
June 28, 2017 at 03:03
So it does. But this is merely changing the symbols of numbers, not the concepts the symbols represent. The number 4 can be symbolized as 4, four, IV,...
June 28, 2017 at 02:49
Is it possible to change the math axioms such that 1+1=3 is mathematically possible? If not, then the scenario of 3 apples resulting from 2 apples is ...
June 27, 2017 at 02:11
This is once again describing an economical or political conflict, and not a personal one as per the original post is about. A personal conflict is ab...
June 27, 2017 at 01:36
Regarding math: I wouldn't disconnect it from reality. Engineers design planes to stay in the air using math. Furthermore, it seems to me that 2+2=4 i...
June 25, 2017 at 02:25
Everything you said above fits into the outcome (ii) in my original post, that is, real malicious intentions from the conflicter. You are correct that...
June 24, 2017 at 18:51
Perception is necessary. Let's say that I indeed would be upset if you had something I did not have. - If it is true but I don't know about it, then I...
June 24, 2017 at 18:37
Yes; that is because there is 1 way to arrange 0 objects. But then it is also true that there is 1 way to arrange nothingness, and so this does not pr...
June 24, 2017 at 02:47
I disagree with your claim that 0 is only analogous to nothing, and I claim they represent the same concept. 'Nothing' means 'no things', means 'zero ...
June 23, 2017 at 02:48
Here is my attempt to demonstrate that the principle 'Nothing comes from nothing' is necessary: Let nothing=0. Let something=x, where x>0. Mathematica...
June 20, 2017 at 02:37
You keep saying that the principle has been reduced to the laws of physics. When in our conversation has it been reduced? Here is an example that uses...
June 15, 2017 at 02:21
I think your definition A is the old definition prior to an established 'scientific method', back when the words 'science' and 'philosophy' were inter...
June 13, 2017 at 02:33
Hey. I am trying to access the page to your article but your link appears to be broken. Could you fix the link, or else summarize your argument here?
June 09, 2017 at 23:11
The thought experiments refute your claim that the principle 'no effect can be greater than the sum of its causes' fails in the example of water boili...
June 09, 2017 at 02:31
You make a good point that empiricism is classified as an epistemology, whereas materialism is classified as a metaphysics, and so they are not synony...
June 08, 2017 at 03:05
First, to be clear, by 'configuration' I meant the narrow range of settings (such as the gravitational constant G) that allow for life to be possible....
June 07, 2017 at 03:21
Are you saying that the laws of thermodynamics don't apply to the early post-Big Bang universe? I thought they were called laws because they applied t...
June 07, 2017 at 02:32
Good point. But by limitations, I meant that God would not be above all things if he was a material being. As all matter and energy is subjected to th...
June 07, 2017 at 02:25
I agree with this. Science presupposes logic, and math is the logic of numbers. That's me. We cannot conceive a universe where 2+2?4. Therefore math i...
June 07, 2017 at 02:08
So you say that empiricism encompasses all experiential things, which includes but is not limited to material things. Could you provide an example of ...
June 07, 2017 at 01:36
That's an interesting point. Here are thought experiments to show that the claims are not arbitrary: 1. Keeping the same source (fire), and replacing ...
June 06, 2017 at 03:59
Your 2-step argument is a good summary. It is however based on a lot of presuppositions that objectors will demand to defend. To name a few: 1. The un...
June 03, 2017 at 17:45