You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Mike Radford

['Member']Joined: December 20, 2019 at 11:17Last active: March 24, 2022 at 13:01None discussions8 comments

Comments

Thanks for kick this ball into the playground Kuro. You are quite right to comment on the trend towards physicalism in philosophy. It compliments the ...
March 24, 2022 at 13:04
Thanks 'Universeness' - I don't think that we can write off an experience that seems to be very common among mankind. The experience is a psychologica...
March 24, 2022 at 12:48
Thanks Agent Smith - neither theism nor atheism are arguments but rather beliefs. If requests/demands are made for justification then an argument migh...
March 23, 2022 at 19:41
Letting the readers act as arbiters might be a bit like letting the blind lead the blind!
March 23, 2022 at 19:41
If the simple living of life was enough then people would not feel impelled to seek further meaning of significance. Simply living life is enough for ...
March 23, 2022 at 04:16
Most concepts of God have him as incomprehensible, inexplicable and unknowable to human intelligence. So what am I saying if I claim either to believe...
March 22, 2022 at 16:34
In: Why x=x ?  — view comment
It is difficult to see what is the content of the proposition, x=x is being presented to the reader. You might only say this if somebody was trying to...
December 24, 2019 at 15:57
This set of posts is getting in bit like a herd of cats - perhaps the opening comment, as rich and engaging as it was did not really offer anything li...
December 24, 2019 at 15:48