You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Mikie

Comments

Interesting post. Couple of points: 1) What if there is no right or left in any meaningful sense? 2) I’m surprised you didn’t give much time to the fi...
January 09, 2026 at 20:22
What’s the wealth distribution like in Australia? It’s likely better than the US, but I would expect about 70-80% of people there living fairly precar...
January 08, 2026 at 12:04
That’s true to a degree, but look at how people really behave. Everyone’s forced into jobs, more or less. And today’s jobs are mostly total crap. Cogs...
January 07, 2026 at 04:35
From another thread long ago: Seven Samurai Shawshank Redemption 2001: A Space Odyssey The Usual Suspects No Country For Old Men Persona 8 1/2 Dances ...
January 07, 2026 at 04:29
Here’s an easy prediction: this will turn out to be a disaster. Quote me on it later.
January 05, 2026 at 20:21
:rofl: And Trump’s approval rating is at 99%.
January 05, 2026 at 20:20
It’s a thinking that privileges the present. It’s not that it doesn’t take anything else into account.
January 05, 2026 at 16:35
I’m not sure Heidegger even used the phrase too often. It was Derrida who popularized it. So whether be deconstructs it or not, I don’t know. In any c...
January 05, 2026 at 05:26
Blasphemy. Also, I’ll never fully understand why Blade Runner is so praised. I liked it to a degree, but not even in my top 100. I guess I had to have...
January 05, 2026 at 02:16
Wow, well that’s saying something. No Country for Old Men? I saw that one a couple times in theaters. Recently I’ve enjoyed The Killer, Left Handed Gi...
January 04, 2026 at 22:31
Second paragraph: I feel like I’ve elaborated further, as necessary. But to each their own. I fail to see the relevance. Plenty of behavior involves n...
January 04, 2026 at 21:39
I think our impressions give us the sense that everything is here and now, and the rest is unknown. At least that’s the emphasis of various types of p...
January 04, 2026 at 18:31
There’s plenty of differences. The propaganda under a democratic administration would be much nicer. But given Trump’s hold on his party and his histo...
January 04, 2026 at 13:54
You could be right, but I don’t care much about Derrida. I think he was mostly a windbag. I mention him in the OP because he popularized the phrase an...
January 03, 2026 at 20:10
So we’re recklessly and lawlessly invading a country and kidnapping its president, and why? For their resources, and so Trump can appear to have a win...
January 03, 2026 at 15:56
In my understanding, it’s a unity in the sense that these traditional terms are really an abstraction from human activity. It’s all happening, and so ...
January 03, 2026 at 15:42
So I would challenge this assumption. Why is the only thing we can be certain of in the “here and now”? But in any case, for everything that is here a...
January 03, 2026 at 15:26
Largely, yes. But not because the theory is necessarily “wrong.” You’re right to push back on such a big claim. But try to think of it less as reinven...
January 03, 2026 at 15:13
Those are excellent questions. (It may take me a little time to respond today, so I wanted to at least acknowledge the response.)
January 02, 2026 at 18:08
That’s true, although like in the case of time, the concept of space is also a little murky. The “here and now” is a well known phrase, and seemingly ...
January 02, 2026 at 16:33
Like Aristotle and Plato, yes. But if that presentation obscures something, we should think about it anew. As opposed to what is absent, hidden, conce...
January 02, 2026 at 03:42
That’s interesting. I’ve never heard of Vervaeke, but I’ll take a look. But the idea — as you describe it —I like. See also Michael Albert’s participa...
January 02, 2026 at 00:39
One Battle After Another Lot of hype— not a bad film, I enjoyed it. Not on par with There Will Be Blood, but still a strong showing. Honestly, I have ...
January 01, 2026 at 23:19
In: Bannings  — view comment
I laughed at this more than I should have. Really out of the blue lol
December 21, 2025 at 22:45
Pretty clear to anyone without an agenda. Trump really has no compassion or empathy, but that’s been known for decades. Whether that extends to his fo...
December 18, 2025 at 18:06
Trump saved the economy, which is the greatest economy in history now. It’s so obvious that he needed to rant about it for 20 minutes on national tele...
December 18, 2025 at 12:40
My reaction to this entire thread. Especially the comments about Marx. Good god.
December 18, 2025 at 12:37
Interesting watch. 16 minutes. Talks about science generally but climate science plays a big part. https://youtu.be/DbTHJWev0nQ?si=i9RYupowsKLlBjaL
December 17, 2025 at 20:55
I haven’t seen any on those yet. I’ll give them a watch if I can find them on one of these damn streaming services. You may be on to something.
December 12, 2025 at 03:52
Still a good movie. Used to like it a lot more as a kid, but still better than the crappy Saving Private Ryan, which was and is one of the most overra...
December 11, 2025 at 03:50
“The Game,” with Michael Douglas. An underrated David Fincher movie. They currently have it free on YouTube.
December 11, 2025 at 01:51
If not, I guess the letter A
December 06, 2025 at 19:20
Scandalous?
December 06, 2025 at 19:19
S
December 06, 2025 at 14:49
Thanks! Once I read through the thread and saw your clues, that was a big help.
December 06, 2025 at 12:47
Clearheaded?
December 06, 2025 at 01:49
Oh wait nevermind. A?
December 06, 2025 at 01:01
Freewheeler?
December 06, 2025 at 01:00
In: Bannings  — view comment
Seemed more than straightforward to me. I can’t believe this is “controversial” enough to fill a couple pages.
December 05, 2025 at 01:03
.
December 05, 2025 at 01:01
The title of the thread. I’d say false. Using “trans” preceding man and woman makes sense, but you cannot change your sex. But it has already been men...
November 28, 2025 at 00:33
Cool, then in that case I agree. If that’s truly what’s being argued for, then I have no objection.
November 26, 2025 at 16:10
Who’s confused? I didn’t see much “confusion” about sex until recently. Ditto for many issues which are motivated not by science or philosophy, but by...
November 26, 2025 at 16:06
We can define things any way we like. There is not one “true” definition of anything, except maybe in mathematics. But in everyday life, will my respo...
November 26, 2025 at 10:42
I think this is a topic where philosophy (if we can call it that) is employed for an agenda and begins to look absurd. Gender is one thing, sex is ano...
November 26, 2025 at 10:25
I tend to agree. He may be crazy enough to cut off all funding. But even then I can’t see Ukraine agreeing to this plan as it’s written.
November 26, 2025 at 02:20
Now I’m curious. I searched for his name and there’s several. Was his name just Marco? Seems like that guy is still a member.
November 26, 2025 at 02:15
Sounds good. It’s actually not a long read, and isn’t as difficult as Being and Time. The last section is especially clear (“the restriction of being”...
November 26, 2025 at 02:02
Putting aside hostility on this issue for a moment, I’m curious as to what everyone thinks of this plan, and what they put the odds of it being accept...
November 25, 2025 at 17:43
Oh no kidding? Cool.
November 25, 2025 at 17:40