You can praise yourself, but I don't think what you say is very "interesting" because it doesn't go to the heart of the matter. The mistake that Heide...
The phrase you quote does not cause any confusion. It simply points out that there is a philosophical tradition which describes the specificity of the...
I don't know why you say this translation is "correct". From what I've read it's pretty controversial. Not to mention the fact that in the index of St...
Let us pass to a specific context. We can analyze this text of Heidegger and you would have the opportunity to explain that Heidegger doesn't say that...
Can you clarify some of what you're saying? Which translation changes the meaning of misinterpretation or concealment? Because the ones I have in Span...
As I said above, Heidegger also uses the distinction between essence and existence in a very similar way to Sartre. What differentiates his concepts o...
Almost all philosophy, except for the most dogmatic positivist, distinguishes between the mode of existence of beings in general and that of the human...
And all the examples I gave you? Have you read them? Deteriorated, dogmatic, concealment, misinterpretation, deformation, to destroy our genuine relat...
I'm afraid you still haven't explained what the terms existence and essence in Heidegger mean. You vaguely allude to the meanings in traditional metap...
It is not in Being and Time, but in Letter on Humanism (trans. Franck Capucci, online) I understand Sartre and Plato perfectly, but I do not understan...
Excuse me. Apart from the fact that I don't know what "indifference" means in your Heidegger quote, I also don't see what it has to do with the paragr...
Where's the difference? In my opinion Heidegger realized that Sartre was drawing his own conclusions from existentialism, which he found unbearable. S...
At the beginning of section #9 of Being and Time, Heidegger makes a nice word game between essentia, existenze, existentia, being, being-present-hand ...
Audacity is an essential characteristic of knowledge. No Galileo, Newton, Einstein or Bohr would have been possible without it. But audacity should no...
Put an end to the global corporations. Put an end to the armies (both imperialist and neo-colonial). Put an end the bureaucracy. Put an end to ignoran...
The answer is not simple. Sartre coined a seemingly paradoxical term that paradoxically sheds some light: conscience irreflexive . It can designate a ...
A figure is not the destiny of history, as the second Heidegger says. Apart from God or the Absolute Spirit, which he explicitly rejects, I don't know...
I document what I say with primary and secondary sources. You seem to ignore both. For example: What kind of question is this? Heidegger repeatedly ac...
Pleasure is a feeling and, as such, it is independent of metaphysical considerations about its object. If something gives you pleasure, it gives you p...
Newton was (and is) right within the scope of his theory. Newton was right against his Cartesian rivals. The Cartesians were wrong. Nevertheless, Heid...
This situation is not predictable neither a short or medium term. In our real world the evasive pleasure is counterbalanced by the reality principle. ...
There's an example up there. "It's either half empty or half full." Perfect hermeneutical relativism.To err in the wrong direction by degenerating the...
Almost off topic: The American philosophers' mania to summarize a long-debated topic in the history of philosophy in a scandalous way that perverts th...
From what little I know about Nozick, I think it's futile speculation. He imagines an extreme hedonist who does not correspond to any philosophical he...
What is the point of talking about science fiction instead of the real world? Does the imaginary assumption of the infinite pleasure machine clarify a...
I'm not sure what Nozick's point is. Is it a psychological issue? That is, what do men really do? Is it a moral issue? That is, what should people do?...
Perhaps the hedonist can prove that people who only want more intense pleasure are wrong. That's what Epicurus thought, at least. For example, an expe...
It is evident that we speak different languages. According to Heidegger there is an essential question: What is being? He dedicated several books and ...
Your first two paragraphs have a lot to talk about. You'll allow me to stand on them. You define the method of interpretation as going anywhere in any...
I will quote you one last text: If after this quotation you continue affirming that for Heidegger Heraclitus, Parmenides and the Greeks who were in th...
Nothing. I think I explained that. It's a dirty trick of the word processor program of auto-correction. It has a mania for change "Being" for "Self". ...
I also appreciate your efforts to answer my questions, even when I feel they are not correct or as inextricably confused as Heidegger himself. I also ...
By mixing two different concepts you've really made a nice mess. According to correspondence theory of truth, something is true when it matches the fa...
It's easier to talk about subjective-intersubjective than subjective-objective. A statement is intersubjective when it is shared by two or more people...
Not all sophists, I think. Gorgias: "Being is not; if it were it could not be known and if it were known it could not be expressed".(I quote from memo...
Camus liked to provoke. In the midst of a depressive phase, at the end of his life, he even said that the only two things that deserved him respect in...
It is obvious that the postulation of a special Being whose meaning does not depend on particular entities forces Heidegger to invent an extra rationa...
All his life Camus claimed he didn't believe in God and his opposition to Christianity was also permanent. He didn't believe in God because he thought...
"God is." "The earth is." "The lecture is in the auditorium." "This man is from Swabia." "The cup is of silver.'' "The peasant is in the fields." "The...
Of course they do. More delicately than I do, but they say that what Heidegger sees in the text is not in it. Or what you think "to violate a translat...
I think this short sentence summarizes Heidegger's position: What I say is not in the text, but the interpretation I make is the good one. Amazing her...
It's this kind of explanation that's misleading. Although it is true that Platonic terminology can be ambiguous in some cases, in its clearest formula...
La paciencia es la madre de la ciencia (Patience is the mother of science), Spanish proverb. But it's not just patience. I like to get into these batt...
Comments