You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

David Mo

Comments

Of course, but the sharp criticism against the Jews is at the heart of his writings, while praises are generally ambiguous and circumstantial. I don't...
March 27, 2020 at 09:35
My sentence referred to someone's Darwinian interpretation of the distinction between Nietzsche's "two races": the servants and the lords. I tried to ...
March 27, 2020 at 07:15
Your comment does not clarify the author of the phrase about culture we were commenting on -either by Nietzsche or yours-, nor Nietzsche's position on...
March 27, 2020 at 07:04
But I was referring to a phrase of yours, not Nietzsche's. If the phrase you were quoting is Nietzsche's, you should show the quote. So the misunderst...
March 26, 2020 at 10:56
No. He was parodying Chernishevsky, a positivist. (See my previous comment). He was not crazy. Dostoevsky himself speaks of him as a kind and quiet ma...
March 26, 2020 at 07:10
At the time when Dostoevsky wrote Notes from the Underground (1864) - and for the rest of his life too - he opposed Nikolay Gavrilovich Chernyshevsky,...
March 26, 2020 at 06:44
No. The context was your own comment.
March 25, 2020 at 08:09
Speaking of Dostoevsky, the "abstract system" that claims to have an exact answer for "everything in this world" is science. What abstract systems tha...
March 25, 2020 at 07:59
"The crowd of triumphant Jews and kikes that has thrown itself on Russia (...) to suck the lifeblood of the liberated but hopelessly indebted peasantr...
March 25, 2020 at 07:34
If science is neutral with respect to religion, it is not understood why they have crashed so often in history. Science would be neutral with respect ...
March 25, 2020 at 07:05
I don't know of any scientist who links quantum mechanics with religion. There are pseudoscientists, New Age mystics and theologians who try. To say t...
March 24, 2020 at 08:47
It is one thing to defend science and another to believe that science explains everything and that there is no more rationality than science. This is ...
March 24, 2020 at 07:23
Also in the paragraphs where he accuses the Jews for their demonic power of hatred towards the Russians in particular and Humanity in general? Do you ...
March 24, 2020 at 07:11
I would like to know on what data you base this statement. My experience is the opposite. At the beginning of the 19th century theodicy was omnipotent...
March 24, 2020 at 06:59
The problem is different for me: How can a rational man enjoy the writings of a fanatical believer in God and the Czar, such as Dostoevsky? Can aesthe...
March 23, 2020 at 07:29
See: . "Worse than a plague." You can see here the religious conservatives' hatred of science and reason. Science is the devil, without nuance. Don't ...
March 23, 2020 at 07:21
"Better" in what sense? Epistemological, moral...? Dostoevsky's epistemology is very weak. His political theology is a disaster. His ( relatively ) be...
March 22, 2020 at 07:14
Yes, Dostoevsky is wrong. The senses do not contradict logic, but some abuses of logic do. In opposing Chernyshevsky's narrow positivism he identifies...
March 21, 2020 at 06:12
No. Pre-reflective consciousness is the "natural" state of human beings. Sartre's work is an anthropology. It's difficult to extrapolate it to animals...
March 20, 2020 at 06:25
I rectify: what is present to the pre-reflexive consciousness is temporality, not time. The past and the future are two aspects of being-for-itself. P...
March 19, 2020 at 07:53
Sartre: Consciousness, that is to say, the project of pour-soi. Heidegger: Being, which is something like God with a different name. In my opinion. I ...
March 19, 2020 at 07:42
At the origin: Camus was a son of workers in gradual ascent towards the bourgeois who said he did not want to be, and Sartre continually debated himse...
March 19, 2020 at 07:16
As you wish. I did a work on the novel and I read it a few times. But I'd have to find an English version to make quotations. Or translate them my way...
March 19, 2020 at 06:52
Background: Against rationalism and science. In behalf of irrational belief in Christ. "If the truth really did exclude Christ, I should prefer to sta...
March 18, 2020 at 14:59
I find also that this discussion is highly productive. In respect your first battery of questions my answer is hesitant. I need to read again Sartre's...
March 18, 2020 at 06:38
Heidegger's first reaction to Being and Nothingness was that Sartre was the philosopher who have understood his theory the most. After that, he possib...
March 18, 2020 at 06:21
I read Hume directly, which doesn't mean I always understand him. Sometimes I get stuck. Other times I read a different interpretation than I do. Many...
March 17, 2020 at 08:46
Not so much. At a certain level quantum mechanics becomes a topic of interpretation and discussions begin. Which are the interesting thing, in my opin...
March 17, 2020 at 08:24
Superiority in life potential. I don't think Nietzsche gave a narrow definition of what he meant by that. You have to look here and there. Superiority...
March 17, 2020 at 08:22
You're welcome. If I find something on the subject, I'll tell you.
March 17, 2020 at 08:09
You do very well. For example: I'm not sure what he took from Lamarck's transformism. Learned characteristics? Doesn't fit.
March 17, 2020 at 08:07
I confess I didn't understand the alternative. For Nietzsche, lordship and servitude are innate characteristics of men. They cannot be changed or modi...
March 17, 2020 at 08:01
How do you know it's the style's fault if you haven't understood it? Maybe what Hume says is stupid. It's the same for me with quantum mechanics. I do...
March 17, 2020 at 07:52
If you're associating Nietzsche with the mafia, you've certainly got it wrong. But the insecurity isn't in Nietzsche, it's in your reading. Just becau...
March 17, 2020 at 07:42
Some important clarifications: Strong and weak are not distributed equally among men and nations. There are weak men and strong men, to the extent tha...
March 17, 2020 at 07:30
Sartre addresses the problem especially in L'être et le néant, Part II, Chapter II, Section III. For me, it is one of the most difficult to understand...
March 16, 2020 at 07:37
In the context of your commentary "a man of Culture" meant what is normally understood. That is: a man who knows and possibly practices arts, humaniti...
March 16, 2020 at 07:12
Hans Frank, the Nazi Governor-General of Poland, passionately played Chopin's Polonaises while exterminating Poles, especially Jews. I don't think the...
March 15, 2020 at 09:53
Sartre: The subject cannot be conscious of himself as an object, because he is no such thing. The subject is freedom. One is only an object for anothe...
March 15, 2020 at 06:49
"Natural selection" is not a Nietzschean concept. The Darwinian concept refers to populations; the Nietzschean concept of instinct refers to individua...
March 15, 2020 at 06:08
This is a paragraph from chapter V of "Beyond Good and Evil", a text that is essential to understand Nietzsche. Summarizing Nietzsche in one paragraph...
March 14, 2020 at 07:36
This is true. But metaphor is the core of literary expression and Nietzsche was as much a poet as a philosopher. This makes reading him exciting, some...
March 12, 2020 at 07:51
Leslie Forster Stevenson: Seven Theories of Human Nature, Oxford University Press. This is my most obvious option. There are many editions. More of a ...
March 12, 2020 at 07:30
Ignorance may be due to epistemological limitations or ontological differences. When the ignorance is deep -as in the case of the mind-brain relation-...
March 11, 2020 at 06:52
Nietzsche admired the Greeks for the harmony between the Apollonian and the Dionysian. This is logical because the Dionysian means destruction. It is ...
March 11, 2020 at 06:42
The problem of the relationship between body (objective) and mind (subjective) does not authorize a strict dualism. The mind is not independent of the...
March 10, 2020 at 06:57
Actually, it' depends on the lobbies, the advertisers and the owners. The same goes for politicians. The unique problem of the media is how to sell th...
March 09, 2020 at 07:07
Let's say you present yourself as an atheist as a tactic to keep the flies off. But you present yourself as an agnostic when you're in the mood to dis...
March 09, 2020 at 06:41
I don't see why it's any easier. On the contrary. Thomas Huxley invented the term agnostic because he was tired of being mistaken for an atheist. He h...
March 08, 2020 at 06:54
I'm not sure what you're not sure of. If my tone is dismissive, it is not my intention. Maybe my English sounds dry because it's not good. I am sorry,...
March 08, 2020 at 06:37