jgill

Comments

On this thread, the posts imply nothing is as it seems. :cool:
January 25, 2021 at 03:48
That's what my philosophy prof told me in a senior-level class when I went to his office and complained that I was having real problems trying to unde...
January 25, 2021 at 00:45
Publishing in such journals may be difficult if the author is not in academia. This has been discussed elsewhere in the forum. Good luck.
January 20, 2021 at 03:19
“The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ, Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line, Nor all thy Tears wash out ...
January 18, 2021 at 01:46
Yes, I'm curious about this. In mathematics, academic institutions have a very powerful influence of what gets published in important journals. The re...
January 17, 2021 at 00:29
Wow. Is Denmark that bad? :scream:
January 17, 2021 at 00:21
Have you published before in a high impact journal? Good luck.
January 16, 2021 at 05:07
For me, this is a very interesting thread. It's more relevant to my own experiences as a math prof than other threads about mathematics, especially th...
January 12, 2021 at 21:43
There was a movie some time back in which the central character had no short-term memory, but solved some sort of mystery, taking copious notes contin...
January 12, 2021 at 20:41
Well, philosophy is certainly good for nothing, at least on TPF: Nothing! A Conceptual Paradox! :cool:
January 12, 2021 at 20:26
Well, that's certainly a serious undertaking. Much hinges upon your findings.
January 12, 2021 at 05:17
Heuristics in mathematical expositions is relative to an intended audience.
January 12, 2021 at 04:31
Yes, an expectation of the reader filling in the gaps is common. It would be dreadful if that practice were abandoned! :cool:
January 11, 2021 at 19:52
I was speaking of completely automated proofs by computer programs. Formal mathematics is simply that employed by research math people these days. You...
January 10, 2021 at 23:45
Is that you in the physics lab explaining quantum entanglement? You have my attention.
January 09, 2021 at 23:49
Well, yes, that's what I meant! Admirable work, Possibility. :grin:
January 09, 2021 at 23:47
A fictional character. :roll:
January 09, 2021 at 23:08
Well, you would have to nit-pick! :cool:
January 09, 2021 at 23:06
Markus Gabriel: the Wise Philosopher Wikipedia: "In an April 2020 interview he called European measures against COVID 19 unjustified and a step toward...
January 09, 2021 at 23:01
A fictional character.
January 09, 2021 at 22:49
I never knew heuristics was so complicated. I frequently used what mathematicians consider heuristics when teaching, particularly in a course in compl...
January 09, 2021 at 22:17
Your original premise seems to resemble the ongoing arguments on this forum about identity and equality. Does A=B mean that A and B are the same? Is 2...
January 09, 2021 at 21:55
Ya gotta be kidding. That's a rational argument? :roll:
January 09, 2021 at 03:24
If these are parallel worlds that are identical, then they have the same "histories", and person A in one world would have the same memories and histo...
January 08, 2021 at 21:00
Of course. In my years as a prof the only times I recall discussing the equal symbol is in elementary set theory. If we had had an actual course in fo...
January 08, 2021 at 20:43
Gosh, you are so confident! Wikipedia on Equation: "There are two kinds of equations: identities and conditional equations. An identity is true for al...
January 08, 2021 at 03:56
I have no problem with philosophers talking about the big issues. The question is, should anyone pay attention to what they say?
January 08, 2021 at 01:20
I bow to the patience and perseverance of those who have replied.
January 08, 2021 at 01:12
I agree. But some would separate the physical universe from its mental counterpart and suggest "universe" is only the physical universe. Same with "ob...
January 08, 2021 at 01:05
These represent two types of equations in mathematics. But you are correct in a fundamental sense of the symbol "=". (just another small reason I've s...
January 08, 2021 at 00:55
Hmmm. :chin: Physicist around?
January 07, 2021 at 03:13
It's unfortunate that the law of identity uses the equation symbol, = , since in math the equality symbol has two meanings: (1) 2=2, identical, and (2...
January 06, 2021 at 04:45
How pleasantly wrong you are, MU. There are cliques within the broad structure of math in which participants work towards common goals. I was in such ...
January 04, 2021 at 21:14
Sometimes games are played for money or prestige. The professional mathematician finds his activities entertaining, frequently fascinating, and he def...
January 04, 2021 at 04:39
It's not an equation. I know, nit-picking, But I am idle at the moment and feeling peevish! Nothing to do.
January 04, 2021 at 00:52
I was thirty years in a math department, and I cannot recall any sort of serious discussion condemning philosophers for meddling in our subject. Occas...
January 04, 2021 at 00:45
You appear to suggest that mathematical axioms are similar to theory in physics. String theory, however, seems un-testable at present. Does it then le...
January 04, 2021 at 00:25
From the perspective of appearances of symbols you have a point. Clearly, 2+2=3+1 displays symbols on either side that are not the same as symbols on ...
January 03, 2021 at 05:09
Good one! :rofl: This might be the key to their salvation: { } = {N} :cool:
January 02, 2021 at 22:05
Repeating this for emphasis. But I fear it will be quickly forgotten. :cry:
January 02, 2021 at 21:59
This is hilarious. One of the reasons I enjoy this forum. :cool:
January 01, 2021 at 05:15
You are thinking too small. One mythical triangle, a hundred triangles, immaterial. Consider a structure akin the Tegmark's mathematical universe that...
January 01, 2021 at 05:05
I've never thought of him as a philosopher, but I suppose he was in a way. Cthulhu and Great Old Ones diminish human existence.
December 31, 2020 at 04:51
Does that mean that those people became simpletons? I'm confused. :chin:
December 31, 2020 at 04:37
Clearly you are not speaking of the social environment here at TPF. :wink:
December 31, 2020 at 04:28
Whoops! Misread this as "Quantum Immorality". Now there's a metaphysical topic worth pursuing! :nerd:
December 31, 2020 at 04:22
Well, that was easy enough. You might join TheMadFool in his investigations of nothing.
December 30, 2020 at 05:02
As I mentioned, professional philosophy appears to be much like professional mathematics. Even in youthful days it was not easy for me to keep abreast...
December 29, 2020 at 04:37
How does this accord with the judicial "Ignorance of the law is no excuse"?
December 29, 2020 at 04:16
I'm with Feynman on this, let's see some examples that unravel the word scramble. :chin:
December 28, 2020 at 22:20