You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

jgill

Comments

On this thread, the posts imply nothing is as it seems. :cool:
January 25, 2021 at 03:48
That's what my philosophy prof told me in a senior-level class when I went to his office and complained that I was having real problems trying to unde...
January 25, 2021 at 00:45
Publishing in such journals may be difficult if the author is not in academia. This has been discussed elsewhere in the forum. Good luck.
January 20, 2021 at 03:19
“The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ, Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line, Nor all thy Tears wash out ...
January 18, 2021 at 01:46
Yes, I'm curious about this. In mathematics, academic institutions have a very powerful influence of what gets published in important journals. The re...
January 17, 2021 at 00:29
Wow. Is Denmark that bad? :scream:
January 17, 2021 at 00:21
Have you published before in a high impact journal? Good luck.
January 16, 2021 at 05:07
For me, this is a very interesting thread. It's more relevant to my own experiences as a math prof than other threads about mathematics, especially th...
January 12, 2021 at 21:43
There was a movie some time back in which the central character had no short-term memory, but solved some sort of mystery, taking copious notes contin...
January 12, 2021 at 20:41
Well, philosophy is certainly good for nothing, at least on TPF: Nothing! A Conceptual Paradox! :cool:
January 12, 2021 at 20:26
Well, that's certainly a serious undertaking. Much hinges upon your findings.
January 12, 2021 at 05:17
Heuristics in mathematical expositions is relative to an intended audience.
January 12, 2021 at 04:31
Yes, an expectation of the reader filling in the gaps is common. It would be dreadful if that practice were abandoned! :cool:
January 11, 2021 at 19:52
I was speaking of completely automated proofs by computer programs. Formal mathematics is simply that employed by research math people these days. You...
January 10, 2021 at 23:45
Is that you in the physics lab explaining quantum entanglement? You have my attention.
January 09, 2021 at 23:49
Well, yes, that's what I meant! Admirable work, Possibility. :grin:
January 09, 2021 at 23:47
A fictional character. :roll:
January 09, 2021 at 23:08
Well, you would have to nit-pick! :cool:
January 09, 2021 at 23:06
Markus Gabriel: the Wise Philosopher Wikipedia: "In an April 2020 interview he called European measures against COVID 19 unjustified and a step toward...
January 09, 2021 at 23:01
A fictional character.
January 09, 2021 at 22:49
I never knew heuristics was so complicated. I frequently used what mathematicians consider heuristics when teaching, particularly in a course in compl...
January 09, 2021 at 22:17
Your original premise seems to resemble the ongoing arguments on this forum about identity and equality. Does A=B mean that A and B are the same? Is 2...
January 09, 2021 at 21:55
Ya gotta be kidding. That's a rational argument? :roll:
January 09, 2021 at 03:24
If these are parallel worlds that are identical, then they have the same "histories", and person A in one world would have the same memories and histo...
January 08, 2021 at 21:00
Of course. In my years as a prof the only times I recall discussing the equal symbol is in elementary set theory. If we had had an actual course in fo...
January 08, 2021 at 20:43
Gosh, you are so confident! Wikipedia on Equation: "There are two kinds of equations: identities and conditional equations. An identity is true for al...
January 08, 2021 at 03:56
I have no problem with philosophers talking about the big issues. The question is, should anyone pay attention to what they say?
January 08, 2021 at 01:20
I bow to the patience and perseverance of those who have replied.
January 08, 2021 at 01:12
I agree. But some would separate the physical universe from its mental counterpart and suggest "universe" is only the physical universe. Same with "ob...
January 08, 2021 at 01:05
These represent two types of equations in mathematics. But you are correct in a fundamental sense of the symbol "=". (just another small reason I've s...
January 08, 2021 at 00:55
Hmmm. :chin: Physicist around?
January 07, 2021 at 03:13
It's unfortunate that the law of identity uses the equation symbol, = , since in math the equality symbol has two meanings: (1) 2=2, identical, and (2...
January 06, 2021 at 04:45
How pleasantly wrong you are, MU. There are cliques within the broad structure of math in which participants work towards common goals. I was in such ...
January 04, 2021 at 21:14
Sometimes games are played for money or prestige. The professional mathematician finds his activities entertaining, frequently fascinating, and he def...
January 04, 2021 at 04:39
It's not an equation. I know, nit-picking, But I am idle at the moment and feeling peevish! Nothing to do.
January 04, 2021 at 00:52
I was thirty years in a math department, and I cannot recall any sort of serious discussion condemning philosophers for meddling in our subject. Occas...
January 04, 2021 at 00:45
You appear to suggest that mathematical axioms are similar to theory in physics. String theory, however, seems un-testable at present. Does it then le...
January 04, 2021 at 00:25
From the perspective of appearances of symbols you have a point. Clearly, 2+2=3+1 displays symbols on either side that are not the same as symbols on ...
January 03, 2021 at 05:09
Good one! :rofl: This might be the key to their salvation: { } = {N} :cool:
January 02, 2021 at 22:05
Repeating this for emphasis. But I fear it will be quickly forgotten. :cry:
January 02, 2021 at 21:59
This is hilarious. One of the reasons I enjoy this forum. :cool:
January 01, 2021 at 05:15
You are thinking too small. One mythical triangle, a hundred triangles, immaterial. Consider a structure akin the Tegmark's mathematical universe that...
January 01, 2021 at 05:05
I've never thought of him as a philosopher, but I suppose he was in a way. Cthulhu and Great Old Ones diminish human existence.
December 31, 2020 at 04:51
Does that mean that those people became simpletons? I'm confused. :chin:
December 31, 2020 at 04:37
Clearly you are not speaking of the social environment here at TPF. :wink:
December 31, 2020 at 04:28
Whoops! Misread this as "Quantum Immorality". Now there's a metaphysical topic worth pursuing! :nerd:
December 31, 2020 at 04:22
Well, that was easy enough. You might join TheMadFool in his investigations of nothing.
December 30, 2020 at 05:02
As I mentioned, professional philosophy appears to be much like professional mathematics. Even in youthful days it was not easy for me to keep abreast...
December 29, 2020 at 04:37
How does this accord with the judicial "Ignorance of the law is no excuse"?
December 29, 2020 at 04:16
I'm with Feynman on this, let's see some examples that unravel the word scramble. :chin:
December 28, 2020 at 22:20